Legal Consequences of Violations of Notary Caution in Making Authentic Deeds

Ali Rouf

Abstract


This study aims to analyze the legal consequences of notary violations of the principle of prudence in making authentic deeds based on Decision Number 366/Pid/2025/PT SMG. The study uses a normative legal research method with a statutory approach, a case approach, and a conceptual approach. The results of the study indicate that violations of the principle of prudence can result in the deed losing its authentic evidentiary power and give rise to legal liability for the notary, both administratively, civilly, and criminally. In Decision Number 366/Pid/2025/PT SMG, the notary was proven to have made a Deed of Minutes of the GMS that did not comply with the legal facts and made changes to the minutes of the deed without legal procedures. The decision emphasizes that the application of the principle of prudence is a fundamental obligation of a notary in ensuring legal certainty and protection for the parties.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Books:

Adjie, H. (2018). Hukum Notaris Indonesia. Bandung: Refika Aditama.

Adjie, H. (2019). Sanksi Perdata dan Administratif terhadap Notaris. Bandung: Refika Aditama.

Anshori, A. G. (2009). Lembaga Kenotariatan Indonesia. Yogyakarta: UII Press.

Fuady, M. (2020). Teori Hukum Pembuktian Perdata dan Pidana. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti.

Kelsen, H. (2018). General Theory of Law and State. New York: Routledge.

Lumban Tobing, G. H. S. (1999). Peraturan Jabatan Notaris. Jakarta: Erlangga.

Marzuki, P. M. (2021). Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Kencana.

Mertokusumo, S. (2019). Hukum Acara Perdata Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Liberty.

Salim HS. (2019). Teknik Pembuatan Akta Notaris. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Sjaifurrachman, & Adjie, H. (2020). Aspek Pertanggungjawaban Notaris dalam Pembuatan Akta. Bandung: Mandar Maju.

Kurniawan. (2021). “Akibat Hukum Akta Notaris yang Mengandung Cacat Formil dan Materiil.” Jurnal Hukum Kenotariatan.

Pratama. (2024). “Pertanggungjawaban Notaris atas Akta yang Menimbulkan Sengketa.” Jurnal Hukum dan Kenotariatan.

Sari, & Rachman. (2023). “Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Notaris dalam Pembuatan Akta Autentik.” Jurnal RechtsVinding.Republic of Indonesia. (2014).

Regulation:

Law Number 2 of 2014 concerning Amendments to Law Number 30 of 2004 concerning the Position of Notary.

Semarang High Court. (2025). Decision Number 366/Pid/2025/PT SMG.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.