1.664 / 5.000 Notary's Liability for Signature Forgery by Applicant (Civil Case Study Number 256/PDT/2020/PT.BDG)

Kristin Kurniasih

Abstract


The legal system applicable in Indonesia regarding and determining the existence of written evidence is in accordance with the provisions in Article 1866 of the Civil Code, hereinafter referred to as the Civil Code, which states that the means of evidence include written evidence, witness evidence, suspicion, confession and oath. The method used in this study is the normative legal research method. The approach method used is a qualitative approach. The types and sources of data use primary and secondary data. The data analysis method used in this study is prescriptive. The results of this study are: Notary's Liability for the Deed of Transfer of Rights and Power of Attorney made before Notary DF, S.H, M.Kn. Number 6 and 7 dated November 30, 2009 in Cibinong, Bogor Regency, which contain elements of forged signatures (in the figure), the Notary cannot be held responsible, either civilly or criminally. As a result of the unlawful act in the form of forgery of the signature of the person appearing in the Deed of Transfer of Rights and Power of Attorney made before Notary DF, S.H, M.Kn. Number 6 and 7 dated November 30, 2009 in Cibinong, Bogor Regency, the notarial deed is null and void. On the grounds that the element of a "lawful cause" is not met, which is one of the objective requirements for the validity of an agreement.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abdullah, Nawaaf dan Chalim, Munsyarif Abdul, (2017), Kedudukan dan Kewenangan Notaris dalam Membuat Akta Otentik, Jurnal Akta, Volume 4 Nomor 4.

Dhea Mardheana, (Juli 2016): “Implikasi Yuridis Pemalsuan Tanda Tangan Pada Minuta Akta terhadap Jabatan Notaris (Studi Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 1234 K/ Pid/2012),” Lex Renaissance 1.

Habib Adjie dan Rusdianto Sesung, 2020, Tafsir, Penjelasan, Dan Komentar Atas Undang-Undang Notaris, PT Refika Aditama, Bandung.

Maria S.W. Sumardjono, 2001, Kebijakan Pertanahan Antara Regulasi dan Implementasi, Cetakan Pertama, Kompas, Jakarta.

Muhammad Adam, 1985, Asal Usul Dan Sejarah Notaris, Sinar Baru, Bandung.

Mukti Fajar dan Yulianto Achmad, 2010, Dualisme Penelitian Hukum Normatif dan Empiris, Cetakan Ke-I, Pustaka Pelajar, Yogyakarta.

Naskah Akademik Rancangan Undang-Undang Jabatan Notaris, sebagaimana diakses dalam https://www.scribd.com/document/372152866/NaskahAkademikRUUJN.

Nusantara, Widinasnita Putri, Chairunnisa Said Selenggang, dan Aad Rusyad Nurdin, September 2020, “Tanggung Jawab Hukum Notaris Atas Akta Pelepasan Hak Atas Tanah Yang Ditandatangani Oleh Bukan Pemilik Yang Sah Analisis Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 1249 K/Pid.Sus/2018.” Indonesian Notary 3.

Salim HS, 2015, Teknik Pembuatan Akta Satu (Konsep Teoretis, Kewenangan Notaris, Bentuk dan Minuta Akta), Radja Grafindo, Jakarta

Sudarto, 2002, Metodelogi Penelitian Filsafat, Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta.

Tan Thong Kie dalam bukunya Studi Notariat dan Serba-serbi Praktek Notaris sebagaimana dikutip dalam Togar Julio Parhusip, “Adakah Masalah Hukum Jika Mengganti Tanda Tangan?” https://www.hukumonline.com/klinik/detail/ulasan/lt570f5347ae286/adakah-masalah-hukum-jika- mengganti-tanda-tangan

Umar Ma’ruf, Dony Wijaya, “Tinjauan Hukum Kedukdukan Dan Fungsi Notaris Sebagai Pejabat Umum Dalam Membuat Akta Autentik (Study Kasus di Kecamatan Bargas Kabupaten Semarang)”, Jurnal Pembaharuan Hukum, Vol. 2, No. 3.

The 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia.

Civil Code.

Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 2 of 2014 concerning Amendments to Law Number 30 of 2004 concerning the Position of Notary,

Civil Decision Number 256/Pdt/2020/PT.Bdg. etc.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.