Notary Compliance with Money Laundering Crime Rules in Business Transactions

Fitra Gusma Yanti

Abstract


Notary Compliance with Money Laundering (TPPU) is a transnational crime that threatens the stability of the global financial system. Notaries, as Public Officials authorized to make authentic deeds, have a strategic role in helping to prevent Money Laundering. This study aims to analyze the obligation of notary compliance with the rules of money laundering in suspicious business transactions and the reporting process. The approach to this research uses the normative juridical approach method and descriptive analysis research specifications. The data used are secondary data with data collection methods using literature studies. Secondary data used in this study include primary legal materials, secondary legal materials, and tertiary legal materials. Primary legal materials consist of laws and regulations related to the research being carried out. Secondary legal materials consist of books, journals. While tertiary legal materials are encyclopedias, magazines, newspapers, articles. The results of the study and discussion show that the obligation of notary compliance with Money Laundering Crimes (TPPU) in business transactions, the first is that notaries are required to report suspicious business transactions because it can make it easier for PPATK to prevent and eradicate money laundering by utilizing several roles of Notaries as Public Officials and Professionals who are interrelated in digging up data on Service Users. And the second is the process of reporting suspicious financial transactions by Notaries with several steps. First, Notaries appoint reporting officers who are responsible for monitoring and identifying suspicious transactions. Second, Notaries must register through the GoAML application. Third, Notaries are required to report suspicious transactions to PPATKap Money Laundering Crime Rules in Business Transactions

Full Text:

PDF

References


Kresna, Basudewa (2022).“Pelaporan Transaksi Keuangan Mencurigakan Oleh Notaris Sebagai Pejabat Umum dalam Penegakan Hukum Pidana”, Acta Comitas Jurnal Hukum Kenotariatan, Nomor 2, Volume 7, hal.298, Fakultas Hukum Universitas Udayana.

Lisnawati, Go, Njoto (2018), Hukum Pencucian Uang Pencucian Uang Dalam Dimensi Kepatuhan, Jakarta: Setara Press.

Mesak, Marthinus Mandala (2021).”Prinsip Mengenali Pengguna Jasa Bagi Notaris Menurut Peraturan Menteri Hukum dan Hak Azazi Manusia Nomor 9 Tahun 2017”, Officium Notarium, Yogyakarta: Magister Kenotariatan Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia.

Noer, Shidqi Salsa, 2020, Hukum Pengawasan Notaris di Indonesia dan Belanda, Jakarta: Kencana.

Okladea, Bella Amanda(2022).”Prinsip Kehati- hatian Notaris di Dalam Pembuatan Akta Yang Sempurna”, Recital Review, Vol. 4 No. 1. E-ISSN: 2623-2928.

Pria, I Made Dharsana (2022), Hukum kenotariatan indonesia, Bandung: Media Sains.

Sanjaya, Ryan & Etty Susilowati (2016 ). “Kajian Terhadap Kepailitan Notaris di Indonesia”. Diponegoro Law Journal. Volume 5(4), hal.2 https://doi.org/10.14710/dlj.2016.13313 diakses 8 Juni 2024 jam 21.30 WIB.

Soekanto, Soerjono. (1998). Pengantar Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Universitas Indonesia (UI) Press.

Sutrisni, Ni Komang & A.A Ketut Sukranata (2013), “Pendekatan Follow The Money Dalam Penelusuran Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang Serta Tindak Pidana Lain” Bagian Hukum Pidana Fakultas Hukum Universitas Udayana.

Taufik, 2024, Seminar Internasional Notaris Dalam Pencegahan Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang, Tangerang,: Universitas Pelita Harapan,

Wimawardani, Kartika dan Luluk Lusiati Cahyarini (2023).”Relavansi Notaris Sebagai Pihak Pelapor Dalam Upaya Pencegahan Tindak Pidana Pencucian uang”, Notarius, Volume 16, Nomor 3, Program Studi Magister Kenotariatan, Universitas Diponegoro


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.