The Effectiveness of Termination of Prosecution in Settling Theft Crimes Based on Restorative Justice
Abstract
This study aims to determine and analyze the implementation of termination of prosecution in criminal acts of theft based on restorative justice, the weaknesses of termination of prosecution in criminal acts of theft based on restorative justice and the effectiveness of termination of prosecution in criminal acts of theft based on restorative justice. The method of this research approach is sociological juridical, the research specification is analytical descriptive. The data used are primary data and secondary data and the data collection method is field study and literature study, while the data analysis method uses qualitative analysis. The theories used are restorative justice theory, legal effectiveness theory and progressive legal theory. Based on the results of the study, it can be concluded that the implementation of termination of prosecution in criminal acts of theft based on restorative justice at the Pekalongan Regency District Attorney's Office has been carried out in accordance with Perja Number 15 of 2020, namely fulfilling formal and material requirements and procedures according to the provisions. Weaknesses of the termination of prosecution in the crime of theft based on restorative justice include the lack of explicit regulation of restorative justice in the law (KUHAP), termination of prosecution based on restorative justice depends on the willingness of all parties, the need for trained and professional facilitator prosecutors, limited number of prosecutors and time constraints, the potential for injustice to victims, ignoring the deterrent effect for perpetrators, and weak oversight of peace agreements. These weaknesses can hinder the achievement of the goals of restorative justice. The termination of prosecution in the crime of theft based on restorative justice has not been fully effective, considering that many cases planned to be resolved based on restorative justice failed. However, cases that have been resolved based on restorative justice have been effective.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Journals:
Ahmad Fauzi, Afandi, Arfan Kaimudin, Penghentian Penuntutan Berdasarkan Peraturan Kejaksaan Republik Indonesia No 15 Tahun 2020 Tentang Penghentian Penuntutan Berdasarkan Keadilan Restoratif, Dinamika, Volume 28 Nomor 8 Bulan Januari Tahun 2022.
Dealita Dwitarani, Kesesuaian Pembuktian Penuntut Umum Dalam Tindak Pidana Penyertaan Disertai Kelalaian yang Menyebabkan Kematian dengan Pasal 184 Ayat (1) KUHAP (Studi Putusan No. 19/Pid.B/2021/PN.Trk), Verstek Jurnal Hukum Acara, Volume 7 No. 2, xxxx.
Dimas Satria Putra and Widayati, The Role of Prosecutors in Enforcing Corruption Crimes at the Balangan District Attorney's Office with Legal Certainty, Legis Ratio Journal, Volume 3 No. 4, December 2024.
Irene Trinita Makarewa, Debby Telly Antow, Daniel F. Aling, Analisis Penghentian Penyidikan Dan Penuntutan Berdasarkan KUHAP, Lex Crimen, Vol. X/No. 9/Ags/2021.
Indi Nuroini, Efektivitas Penerapan Restorative Justice Dalam Kasus Pidana Di Indonesia, Jurnal Cahaya Mandalika, Vol. 5, No. 1, 2024
I Nyoman Tiarta Kurniawan, I Made Wirya Darma, Terobosan Hukum Pidana Melalui Penghentian Penuntutan Perkara Tindak Pidana Umum Berdasarkan Keadilan Restoratif, Vyavahara Duta, Volume XVIII, No.2, Oktober 2023.
Muhammad Saiful Tsani and Aji Sudarmadji, The Inaccuracy of the Public Prosecutor in Applying the Article of the Charge as the Basis for the Judge to Decide Acquit, Jurnal Khaira Ummah, Vol. 19 No. 3, September 2024.
Putri Qomariyah Dewi Kumala, Samsul Huda, Hasan Basri, Restorative Justicesebagai Upaya Alternatif Penyelesaian Tindak Pidanadi Indonesia Berdasarkan Peraturan Kejaksaan Republik Indonesianomor 15 Tahun 2020, Justness, Jurnal Hukum Politik dan Agama, Vol. 4 No. 02, Desember 2024.
Risnawati Br Ginting, Ediwarmana, Edi Yunara, Marlina, Penghentian Penuntutan Melalui Penerapan Restorative Justice di Tingkat Kejaksaan, Locus Journal of Academic Literature Review, Volume 2 Issue 10, October 2023.
Yuli Partimi and Andri Winjaya Laksana, The Role of Prosecutors in Implementing Judges' Decisions on Corruption Criminal Acts (Case Study at The Ende District Prosecutor's Office), Khaira Umma, Vol. 20 No. 2 June 2025.
Books:
Luhut Pangarimbuan, 2013, Hukum Acara Pidana, Papas Sinar Sinanti, Jakarta.
C.S.T. Kansil, 2015, Pengantar Ilmu Hukum dan Tata Hukum Indonesia, Balai Pustaka, Jakarta.
Regulation:
The 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia
Criminal Code
Law Number 8 of 1981 concerning Criminal Procedure Law
Law Number 2 of 2002 concerning the Republic of Indonesia Police.
National Police Chief Regulation Number 6 of 2019 concerning Criminal Investigation.
Etc:
Dengan Humanis, JAM-Pidum Menyetujui Penghentian Perkara Pencurian Motor dari Kejaksaan Negeri Jembrana https://kejati-bali.kejaksaan.go.id, diakses 30 November 2025.
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.30659/jhku.v20i4.49506
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Jurnal Hukum Khairu Ummah Indexed by :
![]() | Jurnal Hukum Khaira Ummah | |
| Faculty of Law, Unissula | Copyright of Jurnal Hukum Khaira Ummah | |
| Jalan Kaligawe Raya KM.4, Terboyo Kulon, Genuk, | ISSN ( 1907-3119 ) e-ISSN ( 2988-3334 ) | |
| Semarang, Central Java, Indonesia, 50112 |




