Law Enforcement of Corruption Crimes in the Buru District Attorney's Office with Legal Certainty (Case Study: Decision No. 40/Pid.Sus-Tpk/2022/Pn.Amb)
Abstract
In enforcing corruption laws, the Prosecutor's Office has dual authority: conducting investigations, prosecuting, and enforcing criminal decisions. In practice, several obstacles remain, including difficulties in implementing decisions regarding payment of fines and restitution of state losses. This study aims to examine and analyze the enforcement of corruption laws at the Buru District Prosecutor's Office, the judge's considerations in Decision No. 40/Pid.Sus-Tk/2022/PN.Amb, and future corruption law enforcement in Indonesia. This research uses a sociological juridical approach, with descriptive analytical research specifications. The data used are primary and secondary data. Data collection methods include field studies and literature reviews, and data analysis methods are qualitative. The theories used in this research are the theory of justice, the theory of legal systems and the theory of legal certainty. Based on the research results it can be concluded that the law enforcement of corruption crimes at the Buru District Attorney's Office, particularly in decision Number 40/Pid.Sus-Tk/2022/PN.Amb, has complied with statutory regulations, both in investigations, indictments, prosecutions, and the implementation of judges' decisions. The judge's considerations in decision Number. 40/Pid.Sus-Tk/2022/PN.Amb are appropriate, namely by considering the fulfillment of the elements of the indictment, considering the level of guilt of the defendant, considering the category of state losses caused by the defendant's actions, considering the impact of the defendant's actions, and the benefits obtained by the defendant. In addition, the judge also considered the category of state losses based on the Sentencing Range Matrix of Supreme Court Regulation Number 1 of 2020. Through appropriate considerations, a fair decision was produced. Law enforcement of corruption crimes in Indonesia in the future by the prosecutor's office is to carry out investigations, prosecutions and implement judges' decisions in accordance with the authority regulated in the law. In the future, demands should always include additional penalties in the form of compensation for state losses, realizing criminal penalties for paying fines and compensation for state losses by making maximum efforts by collecting, confiscating assets and auctioning in accordance with statutory provisions and not implementing subsidiary penalties in the form of fines and compensation for convicts.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Journals:
Amelia, Korupsi Dalam Tinjauan Hukum Islam, Juris,Volume 9 No. 1, Juni 2010.
Askari Razak, Mewujudkan Pemilu Adil dan Bermartabat: Suatu Tinjauan Sistem Hukum Lawrence M. Friedman, Jurnal Fundamental, Vol. 12 No. 2, Juli-Desember 2023
Caswadi and Andri Winjaya Laksana, Ideal Formulation of Corruption Crime Investigation Conducted Under Certain Circumstances, Ratio Legis Journal, Volume 3 No. 4, December 2024.
Christty D. Salindeho, Peranan Jaksa Sebagai Penyidik Dalam Mengungkap Tindak Pidana Korupsi, Lex Privatum, Vol. IV No. 4, April 2016.
Dewi Asri Puanandini, Acep Candra Sukita dan Erizki Satya Nurullah, Penegakan Hukum Tindak Pidana Korupsi Oleh Kejaksaan, Jurnal Sosial Politik, Pemerintahan dan Hukum, Vol. 3, No. 1, Maret 2024.
Farida Sekti Pahlevi, Pemberantasan Korupsi di Indonesia Perspektif Legal System Lawrence M. Friedman, Jurnal El-Dusturie, Vol.1 No.1, Juni 2022.
Haris Fadillah Harahap and Widayati The Law Enforcement against the Personnel of Corruption Crime, Law Development Journal, Volume 2 Issue 4, December 2020.
Heather Leawoods, Gustav Radbruch: An Extraordinary Legal Philosopher, Washingthon University Journal of Law & Policy, Vol. 2 (2000).
Ida Hanifah, Membangun Good Governance Melalui Kepastian Hukum dan Pengawasan Sosial, Jurnal Madani, Volume 6. Nomor 1, 2005
James R. Maxeiner, Some Realism about Legal Certainty in Globalization of the Rule of Law,” Houston Journal of International Law, Vo. 31, No. 1, 2008.
Krisnawati, Rihantoro Bayu Aji, Analisis Penerapan Prinsip Keadilan dalam Pemberian Hukuman pada Kasus Tindak Pidana Korupsi Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 31 Tahun 1999 tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi, Jurnal Magister Hukum Law and Humanity, Vol 3 No 1, 2025.
Lia Hartika, Indri Dithisari, Syarifah Lisa Andriati, Urgensi Pelaksanaan Eksekusi Pidana Tambahan Uang Pengganti Oleh Jaksa Eksekutor Dalam Perkara Tindak Pidana Korupsi, Binamulia Hukum, Volume 11, Nomor 2, Desember 2022.
Lutfil Ansori, Reformasi Penegakan Hukum Perspektif Hukum Progresif, Jurnal Yuridis, Vol. 4 No. 2, 2017.
M. Mulsih, Negara Hukum Indonesia Dalam Perspektif Teori Hukum Gustav Radbruch (Tiga Nilai Dasar Hukum), Legalitas, Volume IV Nomor 1 Edisi Juni 2013.
Natal Gurning, Debora Tambun, Peran Kejaksaan Dalam Penanganan Tindak Pidana Korupsi Dan Impliksinya Terhadap Kepercayaan Publik, Innovative: Journal of Social Science Research, Volume 4 Nomor 6 Tahun 2024.
Natanael Panji Tinangon, “Tugas dan Wewenang Kejaksaan Pada Perkara Tindak Pidana Korupsi Dalam Penyelesaian Pembayaran Uang Pengganti,” Lex Privatum, Vol, 9 No. 12, 2021.
Robert Alexy, “Legal Certainty and Correctness,” Ratio Juris, Vo. 28, No. 4, 2015.
Books:
Adami Chazawi, 2002, Stelsel Pidana, Tindak Pidana, Teori-Teori Pemidanaan dan Batas Berlakunya Hukum Pidana, Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta.
Andi Hamzah, 2003, Korupsi di Indonesia Masalah dan Pemecahannya, Gramedia Pustaka Utama, Jakarta.
Departemen Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, 2001, Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia, Balai Pustaka, Jakarta.
Erik Claes, Wouter Devroe, dan Bert Keirsblick, 2009, Facing the Limits of the Law, Springer, Singapore.
Ermansjah Djaja, 2010, Memberantas Korupsi Bersama KPK (Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi), Sinar Grafika, Jakarta.
Faisal, Ndaru Satrio, Komang Jaka Ferdian, Penegakan Hukum Pertambangan (Genealogi Hukum dan Kekuasaan; Revitalisasi Kebijakan Pertambangan di Kabupaten Bangka Selatan), Istana Agency, Yogyakarta.
Fithriatus Shalihah, 2017, Sosiologi Hukum PT Raja Grafindo Persada, Depok.
Jawade Hafidz Arsyad, 2013, Korupsi Dalam Perspektif HAN, Sinar Grafika.
John Rawls, 2006, A Theory of Justice Teori Keadilan, (Terjemahan oleh Uzair Fauzan dan Heru Prasetyo, Pustaka Belajar, Yogyakarta.
Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi,2006, Memahami Untuk Membasmi (Buku Saku untuk Memahami Tindak Pidana Korupsi), KPK, Jakarta.
Lawrence M. Friedman, 1975, The Legal System: A Social Science Perspective, Russel Sage Foundation, New York.
Mark Fenwick dan Stefan Wrbka, (ed.)., 2016, The Shifting Meaning of Legal Certainty, Springer, Singapore.
Martiman Prodjohamidjojo, 2009, Penerapan Pembuktian dalam Delik Korupsi, Mandar Maju, Bandung.
Moh. Mahfud MD, 2010, Konstitusi dan Hukum dalam Kontroversi Isu, Rajawali Pers, Jakarta.
Regulation:
Law Number 11 of 2021 concerning Amendments to Law Number 16 of 2024 concerning the Prosecutor's Office of the Republic of Indonesia.
Law Number 20 of 2001 concerning Amendments to Law Number 31 of 1999 concerning the Eradication of Criminal Acts of Corruption.
Law Number 8 of 1981 concerning the Criminal Procedure Code.
The 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia.
Internet:
Agus Riyanto, Penegakan Hukum, Masalahnya Apa, https://business-law.binus.ac.id, accessed on 15 Agustus 2023.
Aksi Informasi, https://aclc.kpk.go.id, accessed on 25 April 2025.
Antara, Kejagung:Negara Rugi IDR 310,61 Triliun Akibat Dugaan Korupsi Pada 2024, https://www.antaranews.com, accessed on 25 April 2025
Arti Penegakan, https://lektur.id, accessed on 25 April 2025.
Bab II Tinjauan Pustaka, http://repository.unas.ac.id/6990/5/BAB%20II.pdf, accessed on 25 April 2025.
Herman Budiyanto, Korupsi Dalam Isam, https://www.inews.id/lifestyle/muslim/korupsi-dalam-islam, accessed on 2 August 2025.
KUHP Baru Posisikan Delik Korupsi Bukan Lagi extrarodinary Criime, bagaimana Nasib Pemberantasn Korupsi, https://bphn.go.id/publikasi, accessed on 20 August 2025.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30659/jhku.v20i3.48142
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Jurnal Hukum Khairu Ummah Indexed by :

![]() | Jurnal Hukum Khaira Ummah | |
Faculty of Law, Unissula | Copyright of Jurnal Hukum Khaira Ummah | |
Jalan Kaligawe Raya KM.4, Terboyo Kulon, Genuk, | ISSN ( 1907-3119 ) e-ISSN ( 2988-3334 ) | |
Semarang, Central Java, Indonesia, 50112 |