Legal Responsibility for Corruption Policies in Digital-Based Local Government Goods and Services Procurement Mechanisms

Syifa Utari Ramadhani, Bambang Tri Bawono

Abstract


Policy corruption in digital-based local government procurement mechanisms is a serious threat to the integrity of governance and national development. This phenomenon specifically occurs when public regulations or policies, such as overly specific technical requirements or qualification criteria that deviate from fair procurement principles, are manipulated to benefit certain goods/services providers who have close ties with policy makers. This manipulation exploits gaps in digital systems that should be designed to increase transparency and accountability, for example by deliberately creating ambiguity in electronic auction specifications or limiting access to digital platforms for other potential providers. Therefore, the author raises the title "Legal Responsibility for Policy Corruption in Digital-Based Local Government Procurement Mechanisms". The research method uses a normative juridical approach, namely by examining primary, secondary and tertiary materials, primary legal materials consist of the 1945 Constitution, Presidential Regulation Number 16 of 2018 concerning Government Procurement of Goods/Services and various official documents containing law, then examining secondary legal materials in the form of books, journals, articles, research reports and so on. This research uses 2 approach models, namely carried out with a Statute approach and a conceptual approach. The analysis method of this qualitative juridical research is an analysis method used to describe data comprehensively and qualitatively in the form of sentences that are coherent, orderly, logical, and effective to facilitate data interpretation and understanding of the results of the analysis, the analytical tools used in this study use the theory of legal responsibility and the theory of legal certainty The digital-based procurement mechanism for regional government goods and services is regulated by Presidential Regulation No. 12 of 2021 concerning Amendments to Presidential Regulation No. 16 of 2018 concerning Government Procurement of Goods/Services, supported by the LKPP Regulation as a technical guideline. Legal liability for corruption in digital-based regional government goods and services procurement policies, with criminal liability regulated by the Corruption Law, civil liability can be filed, and administrative sanctions are imposed in the form of a National Blacklist sanction by the LKPP.


Keywords


Policy Corruption; Procurement of Goods and Services; Responsibility.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Journals:

Abenaya Satria, 2021,“Implementasi E-Procurement Dalam Pengadaan Barang/Jasa Pada Lembaga Layanan Pengadaan Secara Elektronik”, Jurnal Administrasi Pemerintahan

Achmad Ratomi, 2018, “Korporasi Sebagai Pelaku Tindak Pidana (Suatu Pembaharuan Hukum Pidana dalam Menghadapi Arus Globalisasi dan Industri), Jurnal Al’Adl

Bahgia,S. 2020, Pengaruh Partisipasi Penyusunan Anggaran, Pemahaman Akuntansi Pemerintahan dan Budaya Organisasi Terhadap Kinerja Manajerial pada Pemerintah Aceh. Jurnal Hukum

Eddy Rifai, 2017. “Perspektif Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi Sebagai Pelaku Tindak Pidana Korupsi”, Jurnal Mimbar Hukum

Fanani, M. Z., & Zamroni, M, 2018. “Function and Role of Administrative Law in the Prevention and Combating of Corruption in Indonesia.” Jurnal Reformasi Hukum

Gunardi, 2005, “Kerangka Konsep dan Kerangka Teori dalam penelitian Ilmu Hukum”, Jurnal Era Hukum

Hari Sutra Disemadi dan Nyoman Serikat Putra Jaya, 2019, “Perkembangan Pengaturan Korporasi Sebagai Subjek Hukum Pidana di Indonesia”, Jurnal Hukum Media Bhakti

Hartono, M. S. 2016. Korupsi Kebijakan Oleh Pejabat Publik (Suatu Analisis Perspektif Kriminologi). Jurnal Komunikasi Hukum

Kamek Putra,2017, “ Korupsi Di Indonesia Presfektif Hukum Islam”, Jurnal Islam Transformatif

Karel Antonius Paeh, 2017, “Pengembalian Kerugian Keuangan Negara Berdasarkan Rekomendasi Badan Pemeriksa Keuangan (BPK) Hubungan dengan Unsur Kerugian Negara dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi”, Jurnal Hukum Pidana

Made Sugi Hartono, 2016, “Korupsi Kebijakan Oleh Pejabat Publik: Suatu Analisis Perspektif Kriminologi”, Jurnal Komunikasi Hukum

Neupane, 2014 “An Empirical Evaluation of the Potential of Public E-Procurement to Reduce Corruption.” Australasian Journal of Information Systems

Nugroho, E. 2014. “Pemanfaatan teknologi informasi dalam rangka memberantas tindak pidana korupsi secara elektronik”. Jurnal Dinamika Hukum

Paulus Israwan Setyoko, 2017, “Pelibatan Masyarakat Sebagai Etika dalam Formulasi Kebijakan Publik Guna Mencegah Praktik Korupsi”, Jurnal Sasi

Sari, R. D., Nasution, F. A., Nasution, M., 2022. Penerapan Tata Kelola Good Governance Terhadap Pengadaan Barang/Jasa Pemerintah di Dinas Kesehatan Kabupaten Labuhanbatu Utara. Jurnal Warta Dharmawangsa

Suhariyanto, Budi, “Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi Berdasarkan Corporate Culture Dan Implikasinya Bagi kesejahteraan Masyarakat,” Jurnal Rechts Vinding: Media Pembinaan Hukum Nasional

Trijono, Rachmat, 2019, “Mendorong Akselerasi Peran KPK dalam Pencegahan dan Pemberantasan Korupsi”, Jurnal Hukum

Yohanes Suhardin, “Peranan Hukum dalam Mewujudkan Kesejahteraan Masyarakat”, Jurnal Hukum Pro Justitia

Zudan Arif Fakrulloh, 2011, “Akuntabilitas Kebijakan Dan Pembudayaan Perilaku Antikorupsi”, Jurnal Hukum Pidana

Books:

Abraham Samad, 2015, “Pembatasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi”, Penerbit Ghalia Indonesia, Bogor

Abu Fida’ Abdur Rafi’, Terapi Penyakit Korupsi dengan Tazkiyatun Nafs, Bogor

Bambang Sunggono, 1997, Metode Penelitian Hukum, Raja Garfindo Pesada, Jakarta

Darji Darmodiharjo dan Shidarta, 1995, Pokok-pokok Filsafat Hukum, Apa dan Bagaimana Filosafat Hukum Indonesia, Gramedia, Jakarta

Dwipayana, Ari. 2003. Membangun Good Governance di Desa. IRE Press. Yogyakarta

Edi Yunara, 2005, Korupsi dan Pertanggung Jawaban Pidana Korporasi, Berikut Studi Kasus,Citra, Aditya Bakti Bandung

Evi Hartanti, 2009, Tindak Pidana Korupsi, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta

Hans Kelsen, 2008, Teori Hukum Murni, Nusamedia, Bandung

Hasbullah F., 2017, Direksi Perseroan Terbatas serta Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi, Jakarta: Kencana.

Iman Sugema, 2006, Anggaran Tidak Memberi Ruang Untuk Menstimulasi Pertumbuhan Ekonomi, Jakarta

Jeddawi, Murtir. 2008. Implementasi Kebijakan Otonomi Daerah: Analisis Kewenangan, Kelembagaan, Manajemen Kepegawaian, dan Peraturan Daerah. Total Media. Yogyakarta

Jhony Ibrahim, 2006,Teori dan Metode Penelitian Hukum Normatif, Penerbit Bayumedia, Malang

Kertapraja, E. Koswara. 2002. Otonomi Daerah untuk Demokrasi dan Kemandirian Rakyat. Candi Cipta Paramuda. Jakarta

Khudzaifah Dimyati, 2010,Teori hukum studi tentang perkembangan pemikiran hukum di Indonesia, Genta Publicshing, Yogyakarta

Lili Rasdjidi dan Ira Rasjidi, 2001, Dasar-Dasar Filsafat dan Teori Hukum, Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung

M. Nurul Irfan,2016, Hukum Pidana Islam, Hamzah Pustaka, Jakarta

Much. Nurachmad, 2011, Buku Pintar Pengadaan Barang/JasaPemerintah, Transmedia Perkasa, Jakarta

Nanang Sutisna, 2024, Managemen Risiko Hukum Dan Regulasi Pengadaan Barang/Jasa Studi Pemerintah, BUMD, dan BUMD, Kencana Prenamedia Group, Jakarta

Peter Mahmud Marzuki, 2008, Pengatar Ilmu Hukum, Kencana, Jakarta

Peter Mahmud Marzuki, 2014, Penelitian Hukum Edisi Revisi, Kencana Prenada Media Group, Jakarta Ridwan H.R, 2010, Hukum Administrasi Negara, UII Press, Yogyakarta

Ridwan Syahrani, 1999, Rangkuman Intisari Ilmu Hukum, Citra Aditya Bakti, Bogor

Romli Atmasasmita, 2013, Buku 2 Kapita Selekta Kejahatan Bisnis dan Hukum Pidana, Fikahati Aneska, Jakarta

Salim HS dan Erlies Septiana Nurbani, Penerapan Teori Hukum Pada Penelitian Disertasi dan Tesis, Buku Kedua, Rajawali Pres, Jakarta

Sholehuddin, 2007, Sistem sanksi dalam hukum pidana, PT Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta

Teuku Faisal, 2018, Hukum Tata Negara dan Hukum Administrasi Negara Dalam Tataran Reformasi Ketatanegaraan Indonesia, Satu Pustaka, Yogyakarta

Timothy Endicott, 2011, Administrative Law, Second Edition, Oxford: Oxford University Press

Wahab, S. A. 2021. Analisis kebijakan: Dari formulasi Ke Penyusunan Model-Model Implementasi Kebijakan Publik. Bumi Aksara, Jakarta

Wayong, J. 2002. Asas dan Tujuan Pemerintahan Daerah. Djambatan Pustaka. Jakarta

Zainuddin Ali, Hukum Pidana Islam, Sinar Grafika,Jakarta

Internet:

Kompas.com, "ICW: Kerugian Negara akibat Korupsi pada 2018 Capai Rp 9,29 Triliun",https://nasional.kompas.com/read/2019/04/28/15294381/icw-kerugian-negara-akibat-korupsi pada- 2018-capai-rp-929-triliun?page=all, diakses pada Senin 6 November 2023.

Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia, “Memutus Rantai Korupsi Terorganisir dan Sistematik, https://www.mkri.id/berita/memutus-mata-rantai-korupsi-terorganisir-dan-sistemik-23601, di akses pada 12 Agustus 2025, pukul 16.38 WIB

Regulation:

Constitution

Law Number 4 of 1979 concerning Child Welfare

Law Number 17 of 2003 concerning State Finances

Law Number 20 of 2001 concerning Amendments to Law Number 31 of 1999 concerning the Eradication of Corruption

Law Number 9 of 2015 concerning the Second Amendment to Law Number 23 of 2014 concerning Regional Government

Law Number 30 of 2014 concerning Government Administration

Presidential Regulation Number 95 of 2018 concerning Electronic-Based Government Systems (SPBE)

Presidential Regulation Number 12 of 2021 concerning Amendments to Presidential Regulation Number 16 of 2018 concerning Government Procurement of Goods/Services




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30659/jhku.v20i3.48092

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Jurnal Hukum Khairu Ummah Indexed by :

google_scholar
Jurnal Hukum Khaira Ummah
   
Faculty of LawUnissulaCopyright of Jurnal Hukum Khaira Ummah
Jalan Kaligawe Raya KM.4, Terboyo Kulon, Genuk,

ISSN ( 1907-3119 )

e-ISSN ( 2988-3334 )

Semarang, Central Java, Indonesia, 50112