Legal Responsibility for Corruption Policies in Digital-Based Local Government Goods and Services Procurement Mechanisms
Abstract
Policy corruption in digital-based local government procurement mechanisms is a serious threat to the integrity of governance and national development. This phenomenon specifically occurs when public regulations or policies, such as overly specific technical requirements or qualification criteria that deviate from fair procurement principles, are manipulated to benefit certain goods/services providers who have close ties with policy makers. This manipulation exploits gaps in digital systems that should be designed to increase transparency and accountability, for example by deliberately creating ambiguity in electronic auction specifications or limiting access to digital platforms for other potential providers. Therefore, the author raises the title "Legal Responsibility for Policy Corruption in Digital-Based Local Government Procurement Mechanisms". The research method uses a normative juridical approach, namely by examining primary, secondary and tertiary materials, primary legal materials consist of the 1945 Constitution, Presidential Regulation Number 16 of 2018 concerning Government Procurement of Goods/Services and various official documents containing law, then examining secondary legal materials in the form of books, journals, articles, research reports and so on. This research uses 2 approach models, namely carried out with a Statute approach and a conceptual approach. The analysis method of this qualitative juridical research is an analysis method used to describe data comprehensively and qualitatively in the form of sentences that are coherent, orderly, logical, and effective to facilitate data interpretation and understanding of the results of the analysis, the analytical tools used in this study use the theory of legal responsibility and the theory of legal certainty The digital-based procurement mechanism for regional government goods and services is regulated by Presidential Regulation No. 12 of 2021 concerning Amendments to Presidential Regulation No. 16 of 2018 concerning Government Procurement of Goods/Services, supported by the LKPP Regulation as a technical guideline. Legal liability for corruption in digital-based regional government goods and services procurement policies, with criminal liability regulated by the Corruption Law, civil liability can be filed, and administrative sanctions are imposed in the form of a National Blacklist sanction by the LKPP.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Journals:
Abenaya Satria, 2021,“Implementasi E-Procurement Dalam Pengadaan Barang/Jasa Pada Lembaga Layanan Pengadaan Secara Elektronik”, Jurnal Administrasi Pemerintahan
Achmad Ratomi, 2018, “Korporasi Sebagai Pelaku Tindak Pidana (Suatu Pembaharuan Hukum Pidana dalam Menghadapi Arus Globalisasi dan Industri), Jurnal Al’Adl
Bahgia,S. 2020, Pengaruh Partisipasi Penyusunan Anggaran, Pemahaman Akuntansi Pemerintahan dan Budaya Organisasi Terhadap Kinerja Manajerial pada Pemerintah Aceh. Jurnal Hukum
Eddy Rifai, 2017. “Perspektif Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi Sebagai Pelaku Tindak Pidana Korupsi”, Jurnal Mimbar Hukum
Fanani, M. Z., & Zamroni, M, 2018. “Function and Role of Administrative Law in the Prevention and Combating of Corruption in Indonesia.” Jurnal Reformasi Hukum
Gunardi, 2005, “Kerangka Konsep dan Kerangka Teori dalam penelitian Ilmu Hukum”, Jurnal Era Hukum
Hari Sutra Disemadi dan Nyoman Serikat Putra Jaya, 2019, “Perkembangan Pengaturan Korporasi Sebagai Subjek Hukum Pidana di Indonesia”, Jurnal Hukum Media Bhakti
Hartono, M. S. 2016. Korupsi Kebijakan Oleh Pejabat Publik (Suatu Analisis Perspektif Kriminologi). Jurnal Komunikasi Hukum
Kamek Putra,2017, “ Korupsi Di Indonesia Presfektif Hukum Islam”, Jurnal Islam Transformatif
Karel Antonius Paeh, 2017, “Pengembalian Kerugian Keuangan Negara Berdasarkan Rekomendasi Badan Pemeriksa Keuangan (BPK) Hubungan dengan Unsur Kerugian Negara dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi”, Jurnal Hukum Pidana
Made Sugi Hartono, 2016, “Korupsi Kebijakan Oleh Pejabat Publik: Suatu Analisis Perspektif Kriminologi”, Jurnal Komunikasi Hukum
Neupane, 2014 “An Empirical Evaluation of the Potential of Public E-Procurement to Reduce Corruption.” Australasian Journal of Information Systems
Nugroho, E. 2014. “Pemanfaatan teknologi informasi dalam rangka memberantas tindak pidana korupsi secara elektronik”. Jurnal Dinamika Hukum
Paulus Israwan Setyoko, 2017, “Pelibatan Masyarakat Sebagai Etika dalam Formulasi Kebijakan Publik Guna Mencegah Praktik Korupsi”, Jurnal Sasi
Sari, R. D., Nasution, F. A., Nasution, M., 2022. Penerapan Tata Kelola Good Governance Terhadap Pengadaan Barang/Jasa Pemerintah di Dinas Kesehatan Kabupaten Labuhanbatu Utara. Jurnal Warta Dharmawangsa
Suhariyanto, Budi, “Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi Berdasarkan Corporate Culture Dan Implikasinya Bagi kesejahteraan Masyarakat,” Jurnal Rechts Vinding: Media Pembinaan Hukum Nasional
Trijono, Rachmat, 2019, “Mendorong Akselerasi Peran KPK dalam Pencegahan dan Pemberantasan Korupsi”, Jurnal Hukum
Yohanes Suhardin, “Peranan Hukum dalam Mewujudkan Kesejahteraan Masyarakat”, Jurnal Hukum Pro Justitia
Zudan Arif Fakrulloh, 2011, “Akuntabilitas Kebijakan Dan Pembudayaan Perilaku Antikorupsi”, Jurnal Hukum Pidana
Books:
Abraham Samad, 2015, “Pembatasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi”, Penerbit Ghalia Indonesia, Bogor
Abu Fida’ Abdur Rafi’, Terapi Penyakit Korupsi dengan Tazkiyatun Nafs, Bogor
Bambang Sunggono, 1997, Metode Penelitian Hukum, Raja Garfindo Pesada, Jakarta
Darji Darmodiharjo dan Shidarta, 1995, Pokok-pokok Filsafat Hukum, Apa dan Bagaimana Filosafat Hukum Indonesia, Gramedia, Jakarta
Dwipayana, Ari. 2003. Membangun Good Governance di Desa. IRE Press. Yogyakarta
Edi Yunara, 2005, Korupsi dan Pertanggung Jawaban Pidana Korporasi, Berikut Studi Kasus,Citra, Aditya Bakti Bandung
Evi Hartanti, 2009, Tindak Pidana Korupsi, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta
Hans Kelsen, 2008, Teori Hukum Murni, Nusamedia, Bandung
Hasbullah F., 2017, Direksi Perseroan Terbatas serta Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi, Jakarta: Kencana.
Iman Sugema, 2006, Anggaran Tidak Memberi Ruang Untuk Menstimulasi Pertumbuhan Ekonomi, Jakarta
Jeddawi, Murtir. 2008. Implementasi Kebijakan Otonomi Daerah: Analisis Kewenangan, Kelembagaan, Manajemen Kepegawaian, dan Peraturan Daerah. Total Media. Yogyakarta
Jhony Ibrahim, 2006,Teori dan Metode Penelitian Hukum Normatif, Penerbit Bayumedia, Malang
Kertapraja, E. Koswara. 2002. Otonomi Daerah untuk Demokrasi dan Kemandirian Rakyat. Candi Cipta Paramuda. Jakarta
Khudzaifah Dimyati, 2010,Teori hukum studi tentang perkembangan pemikiran hukum di Indonesia, Genta Publicshing, Yogyakarta
Lili Rasdjidi dan Ira Rasjidi, 2001, Dasar-Dasar Filsafat dan Teori Hukum, Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung
M. Nurul Irfan,2016, Hukum Pidana Islam, Hamzah Pustaka, Jakarta
Much. Nurachmad, 2011, Buku Pintar Pengadaan Barang/JasaPemerintah, Transmedia Perkasa, Jakarta
Nanang Sutisna, 2024, Managemen Risiko Hukum Dan Regulasi Pengadaan Barang/Jasa Studi Pemerintah, BUMD, dan BUMD, Kencana Prenamedia Group, Jakarta
Peter Mahmud Marzuki, 2008, Pengatar Ilmu Hukum, Kencana, Jakarta
Peter Mahmud Marzuki, 2014, Penelitian Hukum Edisi Revisi, Kencana Prenada Media Group, Jakarta Ridwan H.R, 2010, Hukum Administrasi Negara, UII Press, Yogyakarta
Ridwan Syahrani, 1999, Rangkuman Intisari Ilmu Hukum, Citra Aditya Bakti, Bogor
Romli Atmasasmita, 2013, Buku 2 Kapita Selekta Kejahatan Bisnis dan Hukum Pidana, Fikahati Aneska, Jakarta
Salim HS dan Erlies Septiana Nurbani, Penerapan Teori Hukum Pada Penelitian Disertasi dan Tesis, Buku Kedua, Rajawali Pres, Jakarta
Sholehuddin, 2007, Sistem sanksi dalam hukum pidana, PT Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta
Teuku Faisal, 2018, Hukum Tata Negara dan Hukum Administrasi Negara Dalam Tataran Reformasi Ketatanegaraan Indonesia, Satu Pustaka, Yogyakarta
Timothy Endicott, 2011, Administrative Law, Second Edition, Oxford: Oxford University Press
Wahab, S. A. 2021. Analisis kebijakan: Dari formulasi Ke Penyusunan Model-Model Implementasi Kebijakan Publik. Bumi Aksara, Jakarta
Wayong, J. 2002. Asas dan Tujuan Pemerintahan Daerah. Djambatan Pustaka. Jakarta
Zainuddin Ali, Hukum Pidana Islam, Sinar Grafika,Jakarta
Internet:
Kompas.com, "ICW: Kerugian Negara akibat Korupsi pada 2018 Capai Rp 9,29 Triliun",https://nasional.kompas.com/read/2019/04/28/15294381/icw-kerugian-negara-akibat-korupsi pada- 2018-capai-rp-929-triliun?page=all, diakses pada Senin 6 November 2023.
Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia, “Memutus Rantai Korupsi Terorganisir dan Sistematik, https://www.mkri.id/berita/memutus-mata-rantai-korupsi-terorganisir-dan-sistemik-23601, di akses pada 12 Agustus 2025, pukul 16.38 WIB
Regulation:
Constitution
Law Number 4 of 1979 concerning Child Welfare
Law Number 17 of 2003 concerning State Finances
Law Number 20 of 2001 concerning Amendments to Law Number 31 of 1999 concerning the Eradication of Corruption
Law Number 9 of 2015 concerning the Second Amendment to Law Number 23 of 2014 concerning Regional Government
Law Number 30 of 2014 concerning Government Administration
Presidential Regulation Number 95 of 2018 concerning Electronic-Based Government Systems (SPBE)
Presidential Regulation Number 12 of 2021 concerning Amendments to Presidential Regulation Number 16 of 2018 concerning Government Procurement of Goods/Services
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30659/jhku.v20i3.48092
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Jurnal Hukum Khairu Ummah Indexed by :

![]() | Jurnal Hukum Khaira Ummah | |
Faculty of Law, Unissula | Copyright of Jurnal Hukum Khaira Ummah | |
Jalan Kaligawe Raya KM.4, Terboyo Kulon, Genuk, | ISSN ( 1907-3119 ) e-ISSN ( 2988-3334 ) | |
Semarang, Central Java, Indonesia, 50112 |