"Legal Implications of Limiting Restorative Justice in Traffic Accidents Resulting in Death According to Article 235 of Law Number 22 of 2009 Concerning Road Traffic and Transportation"
Abstract
Law Number 22 of 2009 concerning Road Traffic and Transportation (UU LLAJ), particularly Article 235, explicitly stipulates that traffic accidents resulting in death cannot be resolved through a restorative justice mechanism. This provision creates a juridical dilemma, especially when contrasted with the growing paradigm of restorative justice increasingly accommodated in the Indonesian criminal justice system, such as in the Regulation of the Chief of the Indonesian National Police Number 8 of 2021 on the Handling of Criminal Acts Based on Restorative Justice. This study aims to examine the juridical implications of such restrictions and assess their conformity with the principles of substantive justice, legal certainty, and the protection of the rights of both victims and offenders. The research method employed is normative legal research using a statute approach and a conceptual approach, complemented by empirical study through interviews with law enforcement officials and related stakeholders. The findings indicate that the prohibition of restorative justice in traffic accident cases resulting in death creates tension between legal certainty and the sense of justice within society, particularly when reconciliation occurs between the victim’s family and the offender. Although intended to uphold formal justice and provide victim protection, the restriction may in practice hinder case resolution that is more oriented toward substantive justice, humanity, and the restoration of social relations. Therefore, regulatory evaluation and harmonization are required to achieve a balance between legal certainty and the implementation of restorative justice in fatal traffic accident cases.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Journals:
Department of Justice Canada, Restorative Justice in Canada: An Overview, 2020.
German Criminal Code (Strafgesetzbuch), Section 46a
ICJR, “Restorative Justice Harus Dibatasi: Catatan atas Perkara yang Menyebabkan Kematian”, Laporan Riset 2021.
Jimly Asshiddiqie, (2005), Konstitusi dan Konstitusionalisme Indonesia, (Jakarta: Konstitusi Press.
Komnas HAM, Catatan Akhir Tahun 2021.
LPSK, (2020), Pedoman Perlindungan Hak Korban, Laporan Tahunan
Misi Kepolisian Nasional, Laporan Tahunan 2022.
Norwegian Ministry of Justice and Public Security, Mediation in Penal Matters: Guidelines, 2017.
Books:
Abd al-Qadir ‘Awdah, (1994), Al-Tasyri‘ al-Jina’i al-Islami, (Beirut: Muassasah al-Risalah.
Abu Ishaq Al-Syatibi, 2003), Al-Muwafaqat fi Usul al-Shari‘ah, (Kairo: Dar al-Hadits,
A. Djazuli, (2000), Fiqh Jinayah: Upaya Menanggulangi Kejahatan dalam Islam, (Jakarta: RajaGrafindo Persada.
———.Ilmu Fiqh: (2005), Penggalian, Perkembangan, dan Penerapan Hukum Islam, (Jakarta: Kencana.
Al-Ghazali, Abu Hamid. (1997), Ihya Ulum al-Din, Maktabah al-Risalah, Beirut.
Al-Qaradawi, Yusuf. (1999), Fiqh al-Diyat (Islamic Jurisprudence on Compensation), Dar al-Fikr, Beirut.
Ahmad Wardi Muslich, (2010), Pengantar dan Asas Hukum Pidana Islam, Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Amir Syarifuddin, (2004), Hukum Pidana Islam, (Jakarta: Prenada Media.
Andi Hamzah, (2014), Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana, Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
———. (2019), Pengantar Hukum Pidana Indonesia, Ghalia Indonesia.
Andrew Ashworth, (2015), Sentencing and Criminal Justice, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Arief Gosita, (2009)), Masalah Perlindungan Anak dan Remaja, (Jakarta: Akademika Pressindo,
———. (2009). Masalah Korban Kejahatan, (Jakarta: Akademika Pressindo.
Bagir Manan, (2004). Hukum Positif Indonesia, (Yogyakarta: FH UII Press
Barda Nawawi Arief, (2003), Disparitas Penegakan Hukum Pidana, Semarang: FH UNDIP Press.
———. (2009), Kebijakan Legislatif dalam Penanggulangan Kejahatan, Genta.
———. (2010), Kebijakan Hukum Pidana, (Jakarta: Prenadamedia.
———. (2010), Bunga Rampai Kebijakan Hukum Pidana, Jakarta: Kencana.
———. (2013), Masalah Penegakan Hukum dan Kebijakan Hukum Pidana dalam Penanggulangan Kejahatan, Kencana.
———. (2017), Bunga Rampai Kebijakan Hukum Pidana, Prenadamedia.
David Garland, (2001), The Culture of Control: Crime and Social Order in Contemporary Society, (Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Erniwati, (2022), “Dampak Penyelesaian Damai terhadap Keadilan Korban Kecelakaan Lalu Lintas,” Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan, Vol. 52, No. 1.
Regulation:
Criminal Procedure Code.
Criminal Code (KUHP),
National Police Chief Regulation Number 8 of 2021 concerning Handling of Criminal Acts Based on Restorative Justice.
Law Number 13 of 2006 concerning Protection of Witnesses and Victims.
Law Number 2 of 2002 concerning the Indonesian National Police.
Law Number 22 of 2009 concerning Road Traffic and Transportation.
Law Number 39 of 1999 concerning Human Rights.
Internet:
Kompas, “Keadilan Korban Kecelakaan Kerap Terabaikan”, 12 Februari 2022.
Kompas.com, 20 Juli 2022, “Tabrakan Maut Cibubur dan Proses Hukum Sopir Truk Pertamina.”
Satjipto Rahardjo, (2009), Hukum Progresif: Hukum yang Membebaskan, Jakarta: Kompas.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30659/jhku.v20i3.48037
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Jurnal Hukum Khairu Ummah Indexed by :

![]() | Jurnal Hukum Khaira Ummah | |
Faculty of Law, Unissula | Copyright of Jurnal Hukum Khaira Ummah | |
Jalan Kaligawe Raya KM.4, Terboyo Kulon, Genuk, | ISSN ( 1907-3119 ) e-ISSN ( 2988-3334 ) | |
Semarang, Central Java, Indonesia, 50112 |