The Role of Prosecutors in the Implementation of Judges' Decisions on Corruption Crimes (Case Study at the Ende District Attorney's Office)

Yuli Partimi, Andri Winjaya Laksana

Abstract


Abstract. The role of prosecutors is very important in the implementation of criminal decisions for corruption crimes, considering that prosecutors are responsible for ensuring that court decisions can be implemented effectively in order to uphold justice and restore public confidence in the legal system. This study aims to determine and analyze the role of prosecutors in the implementation of judges' decisions on corruption crimes at the Ende District Attorney's Office along with the obstacles faced and their solutions. This study uses a sociological juridical approach method, the research specification is descriptive analytical. The data used are primary data and secondary data while the data collection method is carried out through field studies and literature studies. The data analysis method is qualitative. The theories used are the theory of law enforcement and the theory of how the law works. Based on the research results it can be concluded that he role of prosecutors in implementing judges' decisions on corruption crimes at the Ende District Attorney's Office has been carried out with their authority as stipulated in the law. The obstacles in implementing judges' decisions on corruption crimes at the Ende District Attorney's Office are the lack of functional prosecutors, difficulties in asset tracing, and the failure to implement replacement money decisions. Therefore, the solution is to add prosecutors for special crimes, conduct asset tracing from the investigation stage until before the implementation of the criminal sentence or imprisonment is completed, and take a preventive approach to the convict's family.

Keywords


Keywords: Corruption Crime; Implementation of Judge's Decision; Prosecutor.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Journals:

Amelia, Korupsi Dalam Tinjauan Hukum Islam, Juris, Volume 9 No. 1, Juni 2010.

Caswadi & Andri Winjaya Laksana, Ideal Formulation of Corruption Crime Investigation Conducted Under Certain Circumstances, Ratio Legis Journal, Volume 3 No. 4, December 2024.

Gebi Emada Turnip, Eksekusi Pidana Denda pada Tindak Pidana Korupsi (Studi Kasus di Kejaksaan Negeri Purwokerto), Jurnal Soedirman Law Review, Vol. 6 Issue 4, November 2024.

Guntur Rambey, Pengembalian Kerugian Negara Dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi Melalui Pembayaran Uang Pengganti Dan Denda, Jurnal Ilmu Hukum De Lega Lata, Vol.1 No.1, Medan, 2016.

H.M.A. Kuffal, 2007, Penerapan KUHAP Dalam Praktik Hukum, UMM Press, Malang.

I Kadek Warga Pernada, I Made Sepud dan Diah Gayatri Sudibya, Pelaksanaan Putusan Hakim Yang Telah Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap Terhadap Uang Pengganti Dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi Putusan Nomor 02/Pid.Sus-TPK/2017/PN DPS, Jurnal Analogi Hukum, Volume 1 No. 3, 2019.

I Wayan Edi Kurniawan, Anak Agung Sagung Laksmi Dewi, I Made Minggu Widyantara, Jaksa Selaku Eksekutor Dalam Putusan Pengadilan Tindak Pidana Pembunuhan, Jurnal Preferensi Hukum, Vol. 1, No. 2, 2020.

Joko Kris Sriyanto and Bambang Tri Bawono, Effectiveness of Performance of Prosecutor's Office in Preventing Corruption Crime after the Team's Disbandment, Law Development Journal, Volume 2 Issue 4, December 2020.

Lia Hartika, Indri Dithisari, Syarifah Lisa Andriati, Urgensi Pelaksanaan Eksekusi Pidana Tambahan Uang Pengganti Oleh Jaksa Eksekutor Dalam Perkara Tindak Pidana Korupsi, Binamulia Hukum, Volume 11, Nomor 2, Desember 2022.

Miftakhul Khobid, Gunarto, Lathifah Hanim, Analisa Kebijakan Formulasi Hukum Pidana Dalam Penanggulangan Tindak Pidana Korupsi, Jurnal Hukum Khaira Ummah, Vol. 13. No. 1 Maret 2018.

Moh. Yusril, Syachdin, Kamal, Implementasi Uang Pengganti Dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi (Studi Kejaksaan Negeri Donggala), Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Toposantaro, Volume 1 No 2, June, 2024.

Mungki Hadipratikto, Eksekusi Putusan Pidana Uang Pengganti Dalam Perkara Tindak Pidana Korupsi Jurnal PSMH Untan, Vol 8, No 2.

M Yusuf Daeng, Tri Novita Sari Manihuruk, Pelaksanaan Eksekusi Uang Pengganti Terpidana Tindak Pidana Korupsi Oleh Kejaksaan Negeri Pekanbaru, Justitia Jurnal Hukum, Volume 6 No 2 Bulan Oktober Tahun 2021.

Tandyo Sugondho, Peran Kejaksaan Dalam Pengembalian Kerugian Negara Akibat Tindak Pidana Korupsi, Dinamika Hukum, Volume 12, No.1, Feb 2021.

Widayati, Implementasi Asas Hukum Dalam Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Yang Partisipatif Dan Berkeadilan, Jurnal Hukum Unissula, Volume 36 No. 2, September 2020.

Yohana EA Aritonang, July Ester, Herlina Manullang, Peranan Kejaksaan dan Upaya Melakukan Pengelolaan Hasil Eksekusi Barang Bukti Tindak Pidana Korupsi (Studi di Kejaksaan Negeri Binjai), Nommensen Law Review, Volume 01, Nomor 01, Mei 2022.

Books:

Abdul Ghofur Anshori, Yulkarnanin Harahab, 2008, Hukum Islam Dinamika dan Perkembangannya di Indonesia, Total media, Jakarta.

Adami Chazawi, 2002, Pelajaran Hukum Pidana Bagian 1: Stelsel Pidana Tindak Pidana, Teori- Teori Pemidanaan dan Batas Berlakunya Hukum Pidana , Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta.

Andi Hamzah, 1990, Korupsi dalam Pengelolaan Proyek Pembangunan, Akademi Presindo, Jakarta.

Aziz Syamsuddin, 2013, Tindak Pidana Khusus, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta.

Baharuddin Lopa dan Mohamad Yamin, 1987, Undang-Undang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi, Alumni, Bandung.

Bahder Johan Nasution, 2008, Metode Penelitian Ilmu Hukum, CV. Mandar Maju, Bandung.

CST Kansil, Engelien R, Palandeng dan Godlieb N Mamahit, 2009, Kamus Istilah Hukum, Jakarta.

Dominikus Rato, 2010, Filsafat Hukum Mencari: Memahami dan Memahami Hukum, Laksbang Pressindo, Yogyakarta.

Evi Hartanti, 2016, Tindak Pidana Korupsi, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta.

Fernando M. Manullang, 2007, Menggapai Hukum Berkeadilan Tinjauan Hukum Kodrat dan Antitomi Nilai, Kompas Media Nusantara, Jakarta.

Jan Michael Otto, 2003, Kepastian hukum di Negara Berkembang, Terjemahan Tristam Moeliono, Komisi Hukum Nasional, Jakarta.

Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia, 2007, Balai Pustaka, Jakarta.

Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi,2006, Memahami Untuk Membasmi (Buku Saku untuk Memahami Tindak Pidana Korupsi), KPK, Jakarta.

Lexy Moleong, 2002, Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif, Remaja Rosdakarya, Bandung.

Lilik Mulyadi, 2011, Tindak Pidana Korupsi di Indonesia, Normatif, Teoritis, Praktek dan Masalahnya, Alumni, Bandung.

Marwan Effendy, 2005, Kejaksaan RI Posisi dan Fungsinya dari Perspektif Hukum, Gramedia Pustaka Utama, Jakarta.

M. Djunaidi Ghoni dan Fauzan Almansur, 2012, Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif, Yogyakarta :ar-Ruzz Media.

Moch. Faisal Salam, 2004, Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi, Pustaka, Bandung.

Mukti Fajar ND dan Yulianto Achmad, 2012, Dualisme Penelitian Hukum Normatif dan Empiris, Pustaka Pelajar, Yogyakarta.

Muladi dan Barda Nawawi Arief, 1992, Bunga Rampai Hukum Pidana, Bandung, Alumni.

M. Yahya Harahap, 1990, Ruang Lingkup Permasalahan Eksekusi Bidang Perdata, PT. Gramedia Pustaka, Jakarta.

Martiman Prodjohamidjojo, 2009, Penerapan Pembuktian dalam Delik Korupsi, Mandar Maju, Bandung.

P.A.F. Lamintang, 2011, Dasar-Dasar Hukum Pidana Indonesia, Sinar Baru, Bandung.

Pujiyono, 2007, Kumpulan Tulisan Hukum Pidana, Mandar Maju, Bandung.

Riduan Syahrani, 1999, Rangkuman Intisari Ilmu Hukum, Penerbit Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung.

Ronny Rahman Nitibaskara, 2005, Tegakkan Hukum Gunakan Hukum, Kompas, Jakarta.

Rudi Pardede, 2016, Proses Pengembalian Kerugian Negara Akibat Korupsi, Genta Publishing, Yogyakarta.

Salim,H.S dan Erlis Septiana Nurbani, 2013, Penerapan Teori Hukum Pada Tesis dan Disertasi, Rajawali Press, Jakarta.

Sidharta, 2006, Moralitas Profesi Hukum, Suatu Tawaran Kerangka Berpikir, PT. Refika Aditama, Bandung.

Soehino, 2000, Asas-Asas Hukum Tata Usaha Negara, Jakarta, Liberty Yogyakarta.

Soerjono Soekanto, 2007, Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Penegakan Hukum, PT. Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta.

Soerjono Soekanto, 2009, Sosiologi Suatu Pengantar, Edisi Baru, Rajawali Pers, Jakarta.

Sudarto, 2009, Hukum Pidana I, Yayasan Sudarto, Semarang.

Sugiyono, 2009, Metode Penelitian Pendidikan Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D, Alfabeta, Bandung.

Syed Husain Alatas, 1992, Sosiologi Korupsi Sebuah Penjelajahan dengan Data Kotemporer, LP3ES, Jakarta.

The New Oxford Illustrated Dictionary, 1982, Oxford University Press.

Vience Ratna Multi Winjaya dkk, 2003, Hukum Pidana Penanggulangan Tindak Perjudian, Amerta Media, Banyumas.

Victor M. Situmorang. Tindak Pidana Pegawai Negeri Sipil, Rineka Cipta, Jakarta.

W.J.S. Poerwadarminto, 1994, Kamus Umum Bahasa Indonesia, Balai Pustaka, Jakarta.

Yan Pramudya Pupsa, 1990, Kamus Hukum, CV. Aneka Ilmu, Semarang

Regulation:

The 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia

Law Number 8 of 1981 concerning the Criminal Procedure Code

Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 20 of 2001 concerning Amendments to Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 31 of 1999 concerning the Eradication of Criminal Acts of Corruption.

Law Number 11 of 2021 concerning the Attorney General's Office of the Republic of Indonesia as amended by Law Number 11 of 2021.

Internet:

Mahjudi, The Judge's Decision is the Judge's Crown,https://badilag.mahkamahagung.go.id, accessed April 24, 2025.

Implementation of Imprisonment Sentences by Prosecutors, Procedures, Duties and Responsibilities,https://line1.news, accessed May 25, 2025




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30659/jhku.v20i2.46250

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Jurnal Hukum Khairu Ummah Indexed by :

google_scholar
Jurnal Hukum Khaira Ummah
   
Faculty of Law, UnissulaCopyright of Jurnal Hukum Khaira Ummah
Jalan Kaligawe Raya KM.4, Terboyo Kulon, Genuk,

ISSN ( 1907-3119 )

e-ISSN ( 2988-3334 )

Semarang, Central Java, Indonesia, 50112