Analysis of Judge's Decision in Corruption Crimes (Study of Decision Number 2205 K/Pid.Sus/2022)
Abstract
The eradication of corruption has not been carried out optimally, where the prosecutor's office often fails to win corruption cases, until the defendant is acquitted. One example of an acquittal for corruption in Decision Number 2205 K / Pid.Sus / 2022. This study aims to determine and analyze the judge's decision in corruption in Decision Number 2205 K / Pid.Sus / 2022 and the basis for the judge's considerations in making a decision on corruption in Decision Number 2205 K / Pid.Sus / 2022. This study uses a normative legal approach method, the research specification is descriptive analytical. The data used are primary data and secondary data while the data collection method is carried out through field studies and literature studies. The data analysis method is qualitative. TThe theories used are the theory of punishment, the theory of justice and the theory of legal certainty. Based on the research results it can be concluded that iImplementation of restorative justice in resolving traffic accidents The judge's decision in the corruption case in Decision Number 2205 K/Pid.Sus/2022 reflects a bad precedent in enforcing corruption law in Indonesia, where the cassation level decision upheld the first level judge's decision, namely that the defendant Samin Tan was declared not legally and convincingly proven to have committed a crime in the first or second indictment and was declared free from all legal charges. The judge in his consideration was not quite right, where the perpetrator should have been punished under Article 5 paragraph (1) of the Corruption Law or Article 13 of the Corruption Law, but the judge stated that the defendant's actions were those of a gratification giver so that he could not be subject to criminal penalties. The breakdown of the elements in the Samin Tan decision did not look at the legal facts directly, because the focus was only on the absence of regulations for the gratification giver, so the judge stated that the defendant was not proven to have committed the crime charged and was declared free.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Journals:
Alfi Nur Fata and Umar Ma’ruf, The Prosecutor's Authority In Criminal Law Enforcement With ARestorative Justice Approach, Jurnal Khaira Umma, Vol. 16 No.3, 2021.
Amelia, Korupsi Dalam Tinjauan Hukum Islam, Juris,Volume 9 No. 1, Juni 2010.
Angga Dwi Arifian and Sri Kusriyah, The Investigation on Criminal Acts of Corruption in the Jurisdiction of Rembang Police, Law Development Journal, Volume3 Issue 3, September 2021.
Asmak ul Hosnah and Jawade Hafidz, The Authority Of Military Court In Punishment Of Corruption Abuse Of Military Housing Savings Funds, Jurnal Pembaharuan Hukum, Volume 11 Number 2, Juli 2024.
Dian Yulianni and Andri Winjaya Laksana, Analysis of Judge's Decision in Case of Sexual Harassment by Doctor Against Patient, Ratio Legis Journal, Volume 3 No. 4, December 2024.
Enggelina Margaritha Fiah, Debi F.Ng. Fallo, Sigit Prabowo, Tinjauan Yuridis Penolakan Permohonan Kasasi oleh Mahkamah Agung Terkait Putusan Bebas dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi, Journal of Administrative and Social Science, Volume. 6, Nomor 2, Juli 2025.
Fence M. Wantu, Antinomi Dalam Penegakan Hukum Oleh Hakim, Jurnal Berkala Mimbar Hukum, Vol. 19 No.3 Oktober 2007.
Jawade Hafidz, Efektifitas Pelaksanaan Sistem Pembuktian Terbalik Terhadap Perkara Korupsi Dalam Mewujudkan Negara Hukum Di Indonesia, Majalah Ilmiah Sultan Agung, Vol.44 No. 118, 2009.
Joyo Mulyo, Analisis Yuridis Putusan Bebas Dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi Di Indonesia, Jurnal Cahaya Mandalika, Vol. 4 No. 2, 2023.
Katrin Valencia Fardha, Perkembangan Teori-Teori Hukum Pidana, Inovative : Journal Of Social Science Research, Volume 3 Nomor 5 Tahun 2023.
Muhammad Fatahillah Akbar, Diskursus Kriminalisasi Pemidanaan terhadap Pemberi Gratififikasi, Jurnal Hukum dan Pembangunan, Volume 54 Number 4, Article 2, 2025.
R.Tony Prayoga, Penerapan Asas Kepastian Hukum Dalam Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 1 Tahun 2011 Tentang Hak Uji Materiil Dan Dalam Peraturan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 06/Pmk/2005 Tentang Pedoman Beracara Dalam Pengujian Undang-Undang, Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia, Vol.13 No.2, Juni 2016.
Susilawati, Peran Penyidik Polri Dalam Pencegahan Dan Penegakan Hukum Tindak Pidana Korupsi (Studi Penelitian Direktorat Reserse Kriminal Khusus Kepolisian Daerah Sumatera Utara), Jurnal Hukum Kaidah, Voume 19, Nomor 1, 2019.
Suwono and Jawade Hafidz, Upside of Evidence by Public Prosecutor in The Case Corruption by Act No. 31 of 1999 jo. Act No. 20 of 2001 on Combating Crime of Corruption, Jurnal Daulat Hukum, Volume 1 Issue 3, September 2018.
Tata Wijayanta, Asas Kepastian Hukum, Keadilan dan Kemanfaatan Dalam Kaitannya Dengan Putusan Kepailitan Pengadilan Niaga, Jurnal Dinamika Hukum, Vol. 14 No. 2, Mei 2014.
Usman, Teori Perkembangan Hukum Pidana, Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Vol. 2 No. 1, 2011.
Yusi Amdani, Formulasi Hukum Pidana Terkait Pertanggung Jawaban Pidana Korporasi Dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi, Jurnal Hukum Samudra Keadilan, Volume 12, Nomor 2, Juli-Desember 2017.
Books:
Adami Chazawi, 2010, Kejahata terhadap Tubuh dan Nyawa, PT .Raja Grafindo, Jakarta
.Adami Chazawi, 2002, Stelsel Pidana, Tindak Pidana, Teori-Teori Pemidanaan dan Batas Berlakunya Hukum Pidana, Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta.
Andi Hamzah, 1993, Sistem Pidana dan Pemidanaan Indonesia, Pradnya Paramita, Jakarta.
____________, 1994, Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana, Rineka Cipta, Jakarta.
Aziz Syamsuddin, 2013, Tindak Pidana Khusus. Sinar Grafika, Jakarta.
Bismar Siregar, 1989, Bunga Rampai Karangan Tersebar, Rajawali Pers, Jakarta.
CST Kansil, 2009, Kamus istilah Hukum, Gramedia Pustaka, Jakarta.
Djoko Prakoso, 1984, Tugas dan Wewenang Jaksa dalam Pembangunan, Ghalia Indonesia, Jakarta.
Fuad Usfa dan Tongat, 2004, Pengantar Hukum Pidana, Universitas Muhammadiyah, Malang
Gregorius Aryadi, 1993, Putusan Hakim dalam Perkara Pidana, Universitas Atmajaya Yogyakarta.
Harun M. Husein, 1992, Kasasi Sebagai Upaya Hukum, Edisi I, Sinar Grafika Jakarta.
Jan Michael Otto, 2003, Kepastian hukum di Negara Berkembang, Terjemahan Tristam Moeliono, Komisi Hukum Nasional, Jakarta.
Koeswadji, 1995, Perkembangan Macam-macam Pidana Dalam Rangka Pembangunan Hukum Pidana, Citra Aditya Bhakti, Bandung.
Leden Marpaung, 2005, Asas Teori-Praktik Hukum Pidana, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta.
Lilik Mulyadi, 2007, Kompilasi Hukum Pidana Dalam Perspektif Teoritis Dan Prakter Pradilan, Mandar Maju, Bandung.
Moeljatno, 2008, Asas-asas Hukum Pidana, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta.
Mukti Fajar ND dan Yulianto Achmad, 2013, Dualisme Penenlitian Hukum Normatif dan Empiris, Pustaka Pelajar, Yogyakarta.
Muladi dan Barda Nawawi, 1992, Teori dan Kebijakan Pidana, Alumni, Bandung.
M Yahya Harahap, 2005, Pembahasan dan Peenrapan KUHAP, Sinar Grafika. Jakarta.
PAF Lamintang, 1991, Kejahatan Jabatan dan Kejahatan Jabatan tertenti sebagai Tindak Pidana,Sinar Grafika, Jakarta
_____________, 2000, Dasar-dasar Hukum Pidana Indonesia, Sinar Baru, Bandung.
Peter Mahmud Marzuki, 2006, Penelitian Hukum, Kencana Prenada Media Group, Jakarta.
R Wiyono, 2012, Pembahasan Undang-Undang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta.
Roeslan Saleh, 1983, Stelsel Pidana Indonesia, Aksara Baru, Jakarta.
Muhammad Rusli, 2007, Hukum Acara Pidana Konteporer, PT Citra Aditya Bakti
Romli Atmasasmita, 1982, Strategi Pembinaan Pelanggar Hukum Dalam Konteks Penegakan Hukum Di Indonesia, Alumni, Bandung.
Satochit Kartanegara, 2001, Hukum Pidana Bagian Pertama, Balai Lektur Mahasiswa, Jakarta.
Sidharta, 2006, Moralitas Profesi Hukum, Suatu Tawaran Kerangka Berpikir, PT. Refika Aditama, Bandung.
Setiawan Budi, 2003, Fiqh Aktual, Gema Insani Press, Jakarta.
Soerdjono Soekanto dan Sri Mamudji, 2001, Penelitian Hukum Normatif : Suatu Tinjauan Singkat, Raja Grafindo Persada, Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta.
Sudarto, 2018, Hukum Pidana I Edisi Revisi, Yayasan Sudarto, Semarang.
Sugiyono, 2011, Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif dan R&D, Alfabeta, Bandung.
Teguh Sulista and Aria Zurnetti, 2011, Hukum Pidana: Horizon Baru Pasca Reformasi, Jakarta. PT. Raja Grafindo Persada. Jakarta.
Victor M. Situmorang, 1994, Tindak Pidana Pegawai Negeri Sipil. Rineka Cipta, Jakarta.
Wirjono Prodjodikoro, 2004, Tindak-tindak Pidana tertentu di Indonesia, PT. Eresco, Jakata.
Regulation:
The 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia.
Law Number 8 of 1981 concerning the Criminal Procedure Code
Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 20 of 2001 concerning Amendments to Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 31 of 1999 concerning the Eradication of Criminal Acts of Corruption.
Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 20 of 2001 concerning Amendments to Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 31 of 1999 concerning the Eradication of Criminal Acts of Corruption.
Law Number 48 of 2009 concerning Judicial Power.
Internet:
Adminwebsite, Theories of Punishment and Purpose of Punishment,https://www.lawyersclubs.com/criminal-theories-and-criminal-objectives, accessed April 15, 2025.
Examination of the Corruption Court's Decision on behalf of the defendant Samin Tan, Cooperation between the UGM Faculty of Law and the Corruption Eradication Committee,https://law.ugm.ac.id, accessed May 20, 2025.
Eko Priyono, Radbruch's Thoughts on Justice in the Context of Women's Tax Provisions,https://www.pajak.go.id, accessed May 29, 2025.
Husnu Abdi, Understanding Analysis According to Experts, Recognize Its Functions, Goals and Typeshttps://www.liputan6.com, accessed May 30, 2025.
KBBI,https://kbbi.web.id/analysis, accessed May 30, 2025.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30659/jhku.v20i2.46092
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Jurnal Hukum Khairu Ummah Indexed by :
 | Jurnal Hukum Khaira Ummah | |
| Faculty of Law, Unissula | Copyright of Jurnal Hukum Khaira Ummah | |
| Jalan Kaligawe Raya KM.4, Terboyo Kulon, Genuk, | ISSN ( 1907-3119 ) e-ISSN ( 2988-3334 ) | |
| Semarang, Central Java, Indonesia, 50112 |