Halal Certification of Insect-Based Food: a critique
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30659/ijibe.5.2.100-112Abstrak
In 2013, the United Nations began to campaign for insect consumption as a rich source of high-quality protein and minerals, to thwart the predicted global food shortage and to reduce greenhouse emission. Consequently, entomophagy (or insect consumption) began to receive stronger impetus, and many food industries and investors are developing an interest in insect-based food production. With the global edible insect market estimated to reach US$1.2 billion by 2023, and the Halal industry predicted to reach US$2.6 trillion by 2023, a good understanding of the interplay between the two industries is a necessity. However, while more insects are increasingly becoming parts of processed foods globally, halal certification bodies do not hold a unified stand on the halalness of insects and their extracts, and some of the arguments raised by some Islamists lack rigorous analysis. This paper juxtaposed the views of the four Sunni Madhabs (schools of Islamic Canon law) on insect consumption and drew on the Qur’an linguistics to derive the relevant factors that must be considered when certifying insect-based gastronomic items as Halal. The novelty of this paper lies in exposing the cultural milieu that informed the verdicts of the classical scholars on insect consumption, which later became the harbinger for the controversies among the contemporary halal certification bodies. The paper seeks to pave the way for a unified Islamic stand with regards to insect consumption.
Keywords: Insect-consumption, Insect-based food, halal certification, Halalan-Tayyiban, Islamic Classical scholars.
Referensi
Al-Bukhari, M., (1978). Sahih al-Bukhari. Dar Ul-Hadith.
Al-Jawziyyah, I. A. Q. (1973). I’lam al-Muwaqqi’in ‘an Rabb al-‘A lamin. Beirut: Dar al-Jayl.
Al-Nawawi, A. I. M. (2007). Al majmu'syarhumuhazzab. Dar Al-Kotob Al-Ilmiyah.
Barennes, H., Phimmasane, M., &Rajaonarivo, C. (2015). Insect consumption to address undernutrition, a national survey on the prevalence of insect consumption among adults and vendors in Laos. PloS one, 10(8), e0136458.
Boas, F., (1896). The limitations of the comparative method of anthropology. Science, 4(103), pp.901-908.
Bußler, S., Rumpold, B.A., Jander, E., Rawel, H.M. and Schlüter, O.K. (2016). Recovery and techno-functionality of flours and proteins from two edible insect species: Meal worm (Tenebrio molitor) and black soldier fly (Hermetiaillucens) larvae. Heliyon, 2(12), p.e00218.
Collins, N., Friedrich, L., &Posthauer, M. E. (2009). The Nutritional Melting Pot: Understanding the Influence of Food, Culture, and Religion on Nutrition Interventions for Wound Healing. Ostomy wound management, 55(5).
Dindyal, S., &Dindyal, S. (2003). How personal factors, including culture and ethnicity, affect the choices and selection of food we make. Internet Journal of Third World Medicine, 1(2), 27-33.
Durst, P. B., Johnson, D. V., Leslie, R. N., &Shono, K. (2010). Forest insects as food: humans bite back. RAP publication.
Dobermann, D., Swift, J. A., & Field, L. M. (2017). Opportunities and hurdles of edible insects for food and feed. Nutrition Bulletin, 42(4), 293-308.
Golnaz, R., Zainalabidin, M., Mad Nasir, S., & Eddie Chiew, F. C. (2010). Non-Muslims’ awareness of Halal principles and related food products in Malaysia. International food research journal, 17(3), 667-674.
Feeley-Harnik, G. (1995). Religion and food: An anthropological perspective. Journal of the American Academy of Religion, 63(3), 565-582.
Freidenreich, D. M. (2011). Foreigners and their food: Constructing otherness in Jewish, Christian, and Islamic law. Univ of California Press.
Hashim, A. H., & Othman, M. N. (2011, November). Halal food consumption: A comparative study between Arab Muslims and non-Arab Muslims consumers in Malaysia. In Australian and New Zealand Marketing Academy (ANZMAC) Conference, Perth, Australia.
Hartmann, C., & Siegrist, M. (2017). Insects as food: Perception and acceptance. Findings from current research. ErnahrungsUmschau, 64(3), 44-50.
Halevi, L. (2012). The Consumer Jihad: Boycott Fatwas and Nonviolent Resistance on the World Wide Web. International Journal of Middle East Studies, 44(1), 45–70.
Heilmann, K. (2015). The effectiveness of international trade boycotts. Journal of International Economics, forthcoming.
Heilmann, K. 2016. Does political conflict hurt trade? Evidence from consumer boycotts. Journal of International Economics, 99, 179–191.
House, J. (2016). Consumer acceptance of insect-based foods in the Netherlands: academic and commercial implications. Appetite, 107, 47-58.
Hussain, I., Rahman, S. U., Zaheer, A., & Saleem, S. (2016). Integrating factors influencing consumers’ halal products purchase: Application of theory of reasoned action. Journal of international food & agribusiness marketing, 28(1), 35-58.
Ibn Al-Qayyim, M. A. 2009. I ‘lam al-Muwaqqi ‘in ‘An Rabb al-‘Alamin. Cairo: Dar al-Gad al-Jadid.
https://www.entomofago.eu/en/2018/07/02/edible-insects-as-food-in-africa/ retrieved on 15th of March, 2020.
Ibn Majah, M. 2007. Sunan Ibn Majah, translated by to English by Nasiruddin al-Khattab, Riyadh: Maktaba Dar-us-Salam.
Just, D. R., Heiman, A., & Zilberman, D. (2007). The interaction of religion and family members’ influence on food decisions. Food quality and preference, 18(5), 786-794.
Karner, C., & Aldridge, A. (2004). Theorizing religion in a globalizing world. International Journal of Politics, Culture, and Society, 18(1-2), 5-32.
Krishnan, S., MohdAderis, M. H. H., Azman, M. N., &Kamaluddin, M. N. A. (2017). Halal food: a study on non-muslim acceptance. American Journal of Economics, 7(1), 41-45.
Kouřimská, L., &Adámková, A. (2016). Nutritional and sensory quality of edible insects. NFS journal, 4, 22-26.
Lesnik, J. J. (2014). Termites in the hominin diet: A meta-analysis of termite genera, species and castes as a dietary supplement for South African robust australopithecines. Journal of human evolution, 71, 94-104 (55-79). Springer, Cham.
Lensvelt, E. J., &Steenbekkers, L. P. A. (2014). Exploring consumer acceptance of entomophagy: a survey and experiment in Australia and the Netherlands. Ecology of food and nutrition, 53(5), 543-561.
Mathew, V. N. (2014). Acceptance of halal food among non-Muslim consumers. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 121, 262-271.
McGrew, W. C. (2014). The ‘other faunivory’ revisited: insectivory in human and non-human primates and the evolution of the human diet. Journal of Human Evolution, 71, 4-11.
Megido, R. C., Gierts, C., Blecker, C., Brostaux, Y., Haubruge, É., Alabi, T., & Francis, F. (2016). Consumer acceptance of insect-based alternative meat products in Western countries. Food Quality and Preference, 52, 237-243.
Moira, P., Sarchosis, D., &Mylonopoulos, D. (2017). The religious beliefs as parameter of food choices at tourist destination The case of Mykonos.
Muhammad, R. (2007). Branding halal food as safe, healthy and clean. Halal Journal.
Omar, E. N., Jaafar, H. S., & Osman, M. R. (2013). Halalan Tayyiban supply chain of the food industry. Journal of Emerging Economies and Islamic Research, 1(3), 1-12.
Orsi, L., Voege, L. L., & Stranieri, S. (2019). Eating edible insects as sustainable food? Exploring the determinants of consumer acceptance in Germany. Food Research International, 125, 108573.
Patience, S. (2016). Religion and dietary choices. Independent Nurse, 2016(15), 26-29.
Pusparini, M. D., & Setiaji, H. (2019). Investigating beyond label of Halalan Tayyiban: the Halal guarantee system in local restaurants, International Journal of Islamic Business Ethics, 4(1), 551-562.
Reckhaus, H. D. (2017). Insects as Beneficials. In Why Every Fly Counts (pp. 9-40). Springer, Cham.
Rumpold, B. A., & Schlüter, O. K. (2013). Nutritional composition and safety aspects of edible insects. Molecular nutrition & food research, 57(5), 802-823.
Rothman, J. M., Raubenheimer, D., & Chapman, C. A. (2011). Nutritional geometry: gorillas prioritize non-protein energy while consuming surplus protein. Biology letters, 7(6), 847- 849.
Shockley, M., Lesnik, J., Allen, R. N., & Muñoz, A. F. (2018). Edible insects and their uses in North America; past, present and future. In Edible insects in sustainable food systems (pp. 55-79). Springer, Cham.
Schleifer, A. (2019). The World’s 500 Most Influential Muslims. Jordan National Library, (10), 44.
Tajudeen, A.L. & Abdurahman, I. 2019. Contamination of halal food products: Insights on theological rulingsâ€, in Johan Fischer and JérémyJammes, eds, Muslim Piety and Economy:Markets, Meaning and Morality in Southeast Asia. London: Routledge, ‘Studies on Material Religion and Spirituality’, 2019, pp. 129-148.
Van Huis, A., Van Itterbeeck, J., Klunder, H., Mertens, E., Halloran, A., Muir, G., &Vantomme, P. (2013). Edible insects: future prospects for food and feed security (No. 171). Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
Vane-Wright, R. I. (1991). Why not eat insects?. Bulletin of Entomological Research, 81(1), 1-4.
Wodak, R., & Meyer, M. (2009). Critical discourse analysis: History, agenda, theory and methodology. Methods of critical discourse analysis, 2, 1-33.
Wibowo, M. W., & Ahmad, F. S. (2016). Non-Muslim consumers’ halal food product acceptance model. Procedia Economics and Finance, 37(16), 276-283.
Wilkins, S., Butt, M. M., Shams, F., & Pérez Ruiz, A. (2019). The acceptance of halal food in non- Muslim countries: Effects of religious identity, national identification, consumer ethnocentrism and consumer cosmopolitanism.
Yasin, Kamal bin Sadiq. (2007). Ahkam al-Hasharat fil Fiqhil-Islami [Translation: The Rulings on Insects in the Islamic Canon Law]. Riyadh: MaktabahAr-Rushd.
Yen, A. L. (2009). Edible insects: Traditional knowledge or western phobia?. Entomological research, 39(5), 289-298.
Yunos, N., Mohamad, Z., Ghazali, M. A., & Awang, M. D. (2018). Halal food consumption as perceived by the non-Muslim in Malaysia. Malaysian Journal of Consumer and Family Economics, 21, 124-135.
Zainuddin, A., & Shariff, S. M. (2016). Preferences for Halalan Toyyiban retail supply chain certification: A case of hypermarket. Procedia Economics and Finance, 37, 405-411.
ZickVarul, M. (2008). After heroism: Religion versus consumerism. Preliminaries for an investigation of Protestantism and Islam under consumer culture. Islam and Christian– Muslim Relations, 19(2), 237-255.
Unduhan
Diterbitkan
Terbitan
Bagian
Lisensi
License and Copyright AgreementIn submitting the manuscript to the journal, the authors certify that:
- They are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
- The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal.
- That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
- That its publication has been approved by all the author(s) and by the responsible authorities – tacitly or explicitly – of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
- They secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
- They agree to the following license and copyright agreement.
Authors who publish with IJIBE agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
- Open Data Commons Attribution License, http://www.opendatacommons.org/licenses/by/1.0/ (default)
- Creative Commons CC-Zero Waiver, http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
- Open Data Commons Public Domain Dedication and Licence, http://www.opendatacommons.org/licenses/pddl/1-0/
Open Data and Software Publishing and Sharing
The journal strives to maximize the replicability of the research published in it. Authors are thus required to share all data, code or protocols underlying the research reported in their articles. Exceptions are permitted but have to be justified in a written public statement accompanying the article.
Datasets and software should be deposited and permanently archived inappropriate, trusted, general, or domain-specific repositories (please consult http://service.re3data.org and/or software repositories such as GitHub, GitLab, Bioinformatics.org, or equivalent). The associated persistent identifiers (e.g. DOI, or others) of the dataset(s) must be included in the data or software resources section of the article. Reference(s) to datasets and software should also be included in the reference list of the article with DOIs (where available). Where no domain-specific data repository exists, authors should deposit their datasets in a general repository such as ZENODO, Dryad, Dataverse, or others.
Small data may also be published as data files or packages supplementary to a research article, however, the authors should prefer in all cases a deposition in data repositories.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.



