Understanding Halal Food SMEs’ Behavior Intention towards E-money

Authors

  • Rina Sari Qurniawati Department of Management, Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi AMA Salatiga
  • Yulfan Arif Nurohman Department of Syariah Banking, IAIN Surakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30659/ijibe.5.2.113-124

Keywords:

e-money, behavioral intention, SMEs

Abstract

This study investigates halal food SMEs intention on use e-money. Prior to the existence of e-money, banking was a solution for small and medium enterprises (SMEs) in doing business and making transactions. Entering the era of the rise of fintech, banks are also competing in issuing their respective electronic money. The lack of interest in halal culinary SMEs in using electronic money, it is important for fintech companies to be able to know and understand perceptions to increase interest in re-transacting using electronic money. However, these are few studies discussed behavioral intention in this new area. Consequently, this study examined the factors that influence SMEs' intention to use e-money. A total of one hundred respondents are selected using quantitative method as sources of data collection. The questionnaires are distributed using purposive sampling method in Surakarta, Indonesia. The software used for analysis is the SPSS 20. This study concludes with conclusion and limitation.

References

Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 50(2), 179-211..

Azwar, S. (2000). Reabilitas Da Validitas. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Belajar.

Ba dan Plavou,2003, kepercayaan, Gramedia:Jakarta

Bauer, R. A. (1960). Consumer behavior as risk taking. Chicago, IL, 384-398.

Cohen, S., 1988. Perceived stress in a probability sample of the United States.

Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models. Management science, 35(8), 982-1003.

DINC, M. S., & Budic, S. (2016). The impact of personal attitude, subjective norm, and perceived behavioural control on entrepreneurial intentions of women. Eurasian Journal of Business and Economics, 9(17), 23-35.

Dowling, G. R., & Staelin, R. (1994). A model of perceived risk and intended risk-handling activity. Journal of consumer research, 21(1), 119-134.

Featherman, M. S., & Pavlou, P. A. (2003). Predicting e-services adoption: a perceived risk facets perspective. International journal of human-computer studies, 59(4), 451-474.

Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (1998). Multivariate data analysis (Vol. 5, No. 3, pp. 207-219). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice hall.

Jogiyanto, H. M. (2007). Sistem informasi keperilakuan. Yogyakarta: Andi Offset.

Kang, H., Hahn, M., Fortin, D. R., Hyun, Y. J., & Eom, Y. (2006). Effects of perceived behavioral control on the consumer usage intention of eâ€coupons. Psychology & Marketing, 23(10), 841-864.

Khatimah, H., & Halim, F. (2014). Consumers’ intention to use e-money in Indonesia based on Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT). American-Eurasian Journal of Sustainable Agriculture, 8(12), 34-40.

Khatimah, H., & Halim, F. (2016). The effect of attitude and its decomposed, perceived behavioral control and its decomposed and awareness on intention to use e-money mobile in Indonesia. Journal of Scientific Research and Development, 3(1), 39-50.

Lau, A. S. (2002). Strategies to motivate brokers adopting on-line trading in Hong Kong financial market. Review of Pacific Basin Financial Markets and Policies, 5(04), 471-489.

Lee, M. C. (2009). Factors influencing the adoption of internet banking: An integration of TAM and TPB with perceived risk and perceived benefit. Electronic commerce research and applications, 8(3), 130-141.

Leerapong, A. (2013). Applying diffusion of innovation in online purchase intention through social network: A focus group study of Facebook in Thailand. Information Management and Business Review, 5(3), 144-154.

Lintangsari, N. N., Hidayati, N., Purnamasari, Y., Carolina, H., & Ramadhan, W. F. (2018). Analisis pengaruh instrumen pembayaran non-tunai terhadap stabilitas sistem keuangan di indonesia. Jurnal Dinamika Ekonomi Pembangunan, 1(1), 47-62.

Martowardojo, A. D. W. (2018). Peraturan Bank Indonesia tentang Uang Elektronik Bank Indonesia.

Pratama, A. B., & Suputra, I. D. G. D. (2019). Pengaruh Persepsi Manfaat, Persepsi Kemudahan Penggunaan, dan Tingkat Kepercayaan Pada Minat Menggunakan Uang Elektronik. E-Jurnal Akuntansi, 27, 927.

Ramadhan, A. F. (2016). Persepsi Mahasiswa Dalam Menggunakan E-money. Jurnal Dinamika Ekonomi & Bisnis, 13(2).

Rustanto, A. E., & Kartini, I. (2019). EFEKTIVITAS PEMBAYARAN NON TUNAI PADA UMKM DAERAH ALIRAN SUNGAI CITARUM. JURNAL LENTERA BISNIS, 8(2), 1-11.

Shih, Y. Y., & Fang, K. (2004). The use of a decomposed theory of planned behavior to study Internet banking in Taiwan. Internet research.

Sudarsono, S. H. (1993). Kamus filsafat dan psikologi PT. Rineka Cipta Jakarta.

Tan, M., & Teo, T. S. (2000). Factors influencing the adoption of Internet banking. Journal of the Association for information Systems, 1(1), 5.

Taylor, S., & Todd, P. A. (1995). Understanding information technology usage: A test of competing models. Information systems research, 6(2), 144-176.

Terry, D. J., & O'Leary, J. E. (1995). The theory of planned behaviour: The effects of perceived behavioural control and selfâ€efficacy. British journal of social psychology, 34(2), 199-220.

Tonglet, M., Phillips, P. S., & Read, A. D. (2004). Using the Theory of Planned Behaviour to investigate the determinants of recycling behaviour: a case study from Brixworth, UK. Resources, conservation and recycling, 41(3), 191-214.

Widyaningsih, A., 2019. Analisis Faktor-Faktor yang Memengaruhi Minat Penggunaan Electronic Money pada Online Shopping (Studi pada Mahasiswa Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta) (Doctoral dissertation, Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta).

Yousafzai, S. Y., Pallister, J. G., & Foxall, G. R. (2003). A proposed model of e-trust for electronic banking. Technovation, 23(11), 847-860.

Downloads

Published

2020-09-30

Issue

Vol. 5 No. 2 (2020): September 2020

Section

Articles

License

License and Copyright Agreement
In submitting the manuscript to the journal, the authors certify that:
  • They are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
  • The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal.
  • That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
  • That its publication has been approved by all the author(s) and by the responsible authorities – tacitly or explicitly – of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
  • They secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
  • They agree to the following license and copyright agreement.
Copyright
Authors who publish with IJIBE agree to the following terms:
  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
Licensing for Data Publication
IJIBE uses a variety of waivers and licenses, that are specifically designed for and appropriate for the treatment of data:
Other data publishing licenses may be allowed as exceptions (subject to approval by the editor on a case-by-case basis) and should be justified with a written statement from the author, which will be published with the article.

Open Data and Software Publishing and Sharing
The journal strives to maximize the replicability of the research published in it. Authors are thus required to share all data, code or protocols underlying the research reported in their articles. Exceptions are permitted but have to be justified in a written public statement accompanying the article.
Datasets and software should be deposited and permanently archived inappropriate, trusted, general, or domain-specific repositories (please consult http://service.re3data.org and/or software repositories such as GitHub, GitLab, Bioinformatics.org, or equivalent). The associated persistent identifiers (e.g. DOI, or others) of the dataset(s) must be included in the data or software resources section of the article. Reference(s) to datasets and software should also be included in the reference list of the article with DOIs (where available). Where no domain-specific data repository exists, authors should deposit their datasets in a general repository such as ZENODO, Dryad, Dataverse, or others.
Small data may also be published as data files or packages supplementary to a research article, however, the authors should prefer in all cases a deposition in data repositories.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.