Implementation of Artificial Intelligence as a Subject of Civil Law in Indonesia: Prospects and Challenges Review

muh rosidi

Abstract


The implementation of artificial intelligence (AI) as a subject of civil law in Indonesia is a captivating topic for discussion. To my understanding, there are currently no specific regulations governing AI as a subject of civil law in Indonesia.  In terms of prospects, implementing AI as a subject of civil law could offer numerous benefits, such as enhanced efficiency in legal processes, improved accuracy in dispute resolution, and much more. AI could also facilitate easier access to legal services for those in need.  However, several challenges need to be addressed when implementing AI as a subject of civil law. These include concerns about data security, privacy, fairness, and transparency in the usage of AI. Moreover, ethical and moral aspects need careful consideration when regulating AI as a subject of civil law.  As a country actively developing technology and regulations in the field of AI, Indonesia needs to undertake in-depth studies and engage in diverse discussions involving legal and technological experts, stakeholders, and other relevant parties. This will allow for the formulation of appropriate and sustainable regulations governing AI as a subject of civil law.


Keywords


Artificial Intelligence (AI); Civil Law; Technology.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Journals:

Argyrou, Aikaterini, and Harry Hummels. “Legal Personality and Economic Livelihood of the Whanganui River: A Call for Community Entrepreneurship.” Water International 44, no. 6–7 (October 2019): 752–68.

Atabekov, A., and O. Yastrebov. “Legal Status of Artificial Intelligence across Countries: Legislation on the Move.” European Research Studies Journal 21, no. 4 (2018): 773–82.

Baum, Seth D., Ben Goertzel, and Ted G. Goertzel. “How Long until Human-Level AI? Results from an Expert Assessment.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 78, no. 1 (January 2011): 185–95.

Cathrin, Shely. “Review of the Philosophy of Culture on the Adat Clean-Village Ceremony in Tawun Village, Kasreman District, Ngawi Regency, East Java.” Journal of Philosophy 27, no. 1 (February 2017): 30-64.

Handoko, B.L., Lindawati, A.S.L., Budiarto, A.Y. 2020. Using Mixed Reality to Provide Experience for Internship Students in the Field of Auditing Studies During Covid 19. In The 2020 2nd International Conference on E-Business and E-commerce Engineering (EBEE 2020), December 29-31, 2020, Bangkok, Thailand. ACM, New York, NY, USA, p.9.

Kusumawardani, Qur’ani Dewi. “Progressive Law and the Development of Artificial Intelligence Technology.” Veritas et Justitia 5, no. 1 (2019): 166–90. https://doi.org/10.25123/vej.3270.

Maryanto, Budi. “Big Data and its Utilization in Various Sectors.” Media Informatics 16, no. 2 (2017): 14-9.

Niman, Erna Mena. “Local Wisdom and Efforts to Preserve the Natural Environment.” Journal of Education and Culture Missio 11, no. 1 (January 2019): 91-106.

Nurcahyanto, Arbi. “ASEAN's Legal Capacity in the Settlement of South China Sea Disputes.” Business Law 4, no. 2 (October 2020): 471-84.

Paul, Sanu. “River as a Legal Entity: An Analysis in the Light of Mohammed Salim vs. State of Uttarakhand.” The IUP Law Review 8, no. 4 (2018): 34.

Pecharroman, Lidia Cano. “Rights of Nature: Rivers That Can Stand in Court.” Resources7,no.13(February2018):1-14. https://doi.org/10.3390/resources7010013.

Scherer, Matthew U. “Regulating Artificial Intelligence Systems: Risks, Challenges, Competencies, and Strategies.” SSRN Electronic Journal 29, no. 2 (May 2015): 354-400.

Schirmer, Jan-Erik, and Gregor Bachmann. “Artificial Intelligence and Legal Personality: Introducing Teilrechtsfähigkeit: A Partial Legal Status Made in Germany.”SpringerInternationalPublishing(2020): 11–55. https://www.rewi.hu-berlin.de/de/lf/ls/bcm/team/jan-erikschirmer/publikationen-und- vortraege/Schirmer_RegulatingAI_Teilrechtsfaehigkeit.pdf.

Volokh, Eugene. “Chief Justice Robots.” Duke Law Journal 68, no. 6 (2019): 1136–92.

Widiyono, Try. “The Development of Legal Theory and the Legal Doctrine of Piercing the Corporate Veil in the UUPT and Its Reality and Future Prospects”. Lex Jurnalica 10, No. 1 (April 2013): 26-39

Books:

Daft L, Richard. 2020. Manajemen. Jakarta: Erlangga.

Danim, Sudarwan, 2020. Motivasi Kepemimpinan dan Efektivitas Kelompok. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta

Fuady, Munir. Theories of Law: Grand Theory. Jakarta: Kencana, 2013.

Hariandja, Marihot Tua Efendi, 2020. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Jakarta: PT. Grasindo

Kurki, Visa AJ. A Theory of Legal Personhood. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019.

Prianto, Yuwono, Viony Kresna Sumantri, and Paksi Yudha Sasmita. Pros and Cons of AI Robot as a Legal Subject. Paris: Atlantis Press, 2020.

Rahardjo, Satjipto. Progressive Law: A Synthesis of Indonesian Law. Yogyakarta: Genta Publishing, 2009.

Rido, R. Ali. Legal Entity and Legal Status of Corporations, Associations, Cooperatives, Foundations, and Wakaf. Bandung: Alumni, 2001.

Salim, HS. Introduction to Written Civil Law (BW). Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2002.

Sudjito. Progressive Law to Achieve Substantive Justice Within the Framework of Pancasila Values. Yogyakarta: Pancasila Study Center UGM, 2012.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.