The Urgency of Legal Justice in Determining the Timeframe for Filing a Lawsuit with the Administrative Court
Abstract
The deadline for filing a lawsuit to the PTUN is legally based on Article 55 of Law No. 51 of 2009. This study aims to examine the 90-day deadline that has been regulated in the PTUN Law, how its implications for the rights of citizens who are lost due to the lack of procedural flexibility in proceedings at the PTUN. The urgency of this research is to explain more deeply the urgency of legal justice related to the deadline for filing a lawsuit to the PTUN. This is because so far many cases have been NO or declared unacceptable only because of formal reasons such as the expiration of the lawsuit submission that is more than 90 days. So is this legal norm relevant if it is used continuously in resolving TUN disputes. The approach method used in this study is to use a normative juridical approach that examines law as a system and construction of norms by analyzing it from the aspects of legislation, legal principles, doctrines, and court decisions. The results of the discussion, first, the deadline for filing a lawsuit is regulated normatively through Article 55 of the PTUN Law, which stipulates that a lawsuit must be filed within a 90-day time limit from the receipt or announcement of the KTUN. This regulation is especially for parties who are directly addressed by the KTUN object of the dispute. Regarding third parties who are not directly addressed, the judge refers to the jurisprudence of several previous decisions and refers to SEMA No. 2 of 1991 which was updated in SEMA No. 3 of 2015. Second, related to the many N.O decisions due to the expiration of the lawsuit submission before the judge can examine the main case, judicial activism becomes important but also does not mean violating formal rules. Judges play an important role in upholding legal certainty so that it can run in line with the principle of substantive justice without eliminating the rights of citizens.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Agustin, K. A., Firdaus, M. R., & Ardani, A. H. (2026). Analisis Yuridis atas Tenggang Waktu Gugatan dalam Perspektif Kepastian Hukum dan Keadilan Substantif Putusan No . 250 / G / 2024 / PTUN . JKT. Al-Zayn: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Hukum, 4(1), 26–38.
Azhar, I. (2021). Keberadaan Pihak Ketiga Wujud Keadilan Hukum Dalam Gugatan Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara (Kajian Putusan No.41/K/TUN/1994). Jurnal Yudisial, 14(3), 355. https://doi.org/10.29123/jy.v14i3.494
Bayu Rahmaddoni, Kurnia Warman, Y. (2023). Penyelesaian Sengketa Melalui Upaya Administratif di Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara Padang. Swarajustisia, 7(1), 749–763.
Chafid, M., & Erliyana, A. (2020). Implikasi Procedural Time-Limits atas Gugatan Keputusan Administrasi Negara (Studi Banding: Indonesia, Australia, Kanada). Administrative Law and Governance Journal, 3(4), 742–763.
Florentina Dewi Pramesuari. (2024). Penyelesaian Gugatan Keputusan Tata Usaha Negara dalam Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara ( PTUN ). Jurnal Hukum Dan HAM Wara Sains, 03(03), 413–423.
Gaspersz, D., Pietersz, J. J., & Pattipawae, D. R. (2023). Kompetensi Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara Dalam Memeriksa, Mengadili Dan Memutus Perkara Nomor: 26/G/2020/Ptun.Abn. Jurnal Saniri, 3(2), 50. https://doi.org/10.47268/saniri.v3i2.1616
Hajatulloh. (2025). Tinjauan Yuridis Terhadap Jangka Waktu Gugatan Ptun Di Persimpangan Antara Prosedural Dan Hak Asasi Manusia. Journal of Innovative and Creativity, 5(2), 17793–17807.
Hak Waris Terhalangi Akibat Tenggang Waktu Gugatan di PTUN - Berita _ Mahkamah Konstitusi RI. (n.d.).
Hakim, A. A. (2025). Penerapan Keadilan Substantif oleh Mahkamah Konstitusi Pada Sengketa Pemilihan Kepala Daerah. Hukum, XVI(24), 2115–2134.
Haq, Z. A., & Syanel, M. F. P. (2022). Judicial Activism Di Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara Sebagai Upaya Progresivisme Hakim Dalam Melindungi Hak Konstitusional Warga Negara. SALAM: Jurnal Sosial Dan Budaya Syar-I, 9(4), 1245–1260. https://doi.org/10.15408/sjsbs.v9i4.26659
Haryono, H. (2019). PENEGAKAN HUKUM BERBASIS NILAI KEADILAN SUBSTANTIF (Studi Putusan MK No. 46/PUU-VII/2012 Tertanggal 13 Februari 2012). Jurnal Hukum Progresif, 7(1), 20. https://doi.org/10.14710/hp.7.1.20-39
Hasanah, G. N., Kharisma, D. B., Universitas, H., Maret, S., & Tengah, J. (2022). EKSISTENSI JUDICIAL ACTIVISM DALAM PRAKTIK KONSTITUSI OLEH MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI. Souvereignty: Jurnal Demokrasi Dan Ketahanan Nasional, 1(4), 734–744.
Hayati, M. (2021). Maladministrasi Dalam Tindakan Pemerintah. Wasaka Hukum, 9(1), 113–150. https://ojs.stihsa-bjm.ac.id/index.php/wasaka/article/view/35
Jaelani, A. K. (2019). Implementasi Daluarsa Gugatan dalam Putusan Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara di Indonesia. Pena Justisia, 18(2), 56–70.
Kartabrata, F. R., Ernawan, M. E., & Dwinanda, I. A. (2025). Harmonisasi Sistem Hukum Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara dalam Mewujudkan Kepastian Hukum Tenggang Waktu Gugatan. Litigasi, 26(2), 1–36. https://doi.org/10.23969/litigasi.v26i2.26164
Khoiriyah, N. N. (2022). Studi Analisis Tentang Penyelesaian Sengketa Tata Usaha Negara. Jurnal Syntax Admiration, 3(6), 776–785.
Laia, A., & Purwanto. (2023). Kebenaran Dan Keadilan Hukum. Jurnal Panah Keadilan, 2(1), 1–14. https://jurnal.uniraya.ac.id/index.php/PanahKeadilan/article/view/709
Martin, R. A., & Erliyana, A. (2020). Polemik Jangka Waktu Pengajuan Gugatan Ke Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara. Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan, 49(4), 942. https://doi.org/10.21143/jhp.vol49.no4.2350
Optapia, D., Monica, D. R., & Tamza, F. B. (2025). Analisis Keadilan Substantif dalam Putusan Kasasi Terkait Tindak Pidana Kehutanan. Aliansi: Jurnal Hukum, Pendidikan Dan Sosial Humaniora, 2(2), 28–36.
Rosidi, A., Zainuddin, M., & Arifiana, I. (2024). Metode Dalam Penelitian Hukum Normatif Dan Sosiologis (Field Research). Journal Law and Government, 2(1), 46. https://doi.org/10.31764/jlag.v2i1.21606
Ruman, Y. S. (2012). Keadilan Hukum dan Penerapannya dalam Pengadilan. Humaniora, 3(2), 345. https://doi.org/10.21512/humaniora.v3i2.3327
Salman, T., & Budhiartie, A. (2024). Analisis konsep keadilan dalam pandangan filsafat hukum aristoteles dan relevansinya di indonesia. Jurnal Nalar Keadilan, 4(2), 49–57.
Seregig, I. K. (2023). Mewujudkan keadilan substantif dalam penegakan hukum pidana di indonesia (Studi Empirik Terhadap Praktik Keadilan Koordinatif) (Januari, 2). Universitas Bandar Lampung (UBL Press).
Slamet, S. R. (2023). Kepastian Hukum Tenggang Waktu Pengajuan Gugatan Sengketa Tata Usaha Negara Bagi Pihak Ketiga Yang Berkepentingan Pasca Berlakunya Perma No. 6 Tahun 2018. Forum Ilmiah, 20(2), 84.
Spaltani, B. G. (2024). Rekonsesi Perbuatan Pemerintah (Bestuurhandeling) Guna Mewujudkan Kepastian Hukum yang Berkeadilan. Konferensi Nasional Asosiasi Pengajar Hukum Tata Negara Dan Hukum Administrasi Negara, 2(1), 55–78. https://doi.org/10.55292/dt3r3350
Spaltani, B. G. (2025). Sistem Peradilan Administrasi Negara Pasca Hadirnya Undang-undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2014 Tentang Administrasi Pemerintahan. Jurnal Hukum Dan Administrasi Publik, 3(1), 51–62. https://ejournal.literaaksara.com/index.php/JHAP/index
Sri Wahyuni, & Arif Wibowo. (2023). Kewenangan, Subjek dan Objek Sengketa di Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara (PTUN). JUSTICES: Journal of Law, 2(1), 34–46. https://doi.org/10.58355/justices.v2i1.8
Sudarsono. (2021). Judicial Activism Hakim Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara Mewujudkan Kebersisteman Hukum Lingkungan Hidup. Prosiding Seminar Hukum Aktual Kebijakan Lingkungan Hidup Di Indonesia: Refleksi Dan Tantangan, 103–117.
Winarna, Bawole, P., & Hadilinatih, B. (2021). Redefinisi Ruang Publik di Masa Pandemi Covid-19. Vitruvian: Jurnal Arsitektur, Bangunan, & Lingkungan, 10(3), 237–256.
Yuddin Chandra Nan Arif. (2013). the Dimension of the Change of Law Viewed From the Perspective of Open Legal System. Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum Dan Keadilan, 1(Dialektika Kepastian Hukum dan Keadilan), 113–127. https://jurnalius.ac.id/ojs/index.php/jurnalIUS/issue/view/19/showToc
Yunantyo Adi Setiawan, U. P. (2022). Permasalahan Tenggang Waktu Pengajuan Gugatan Oleh Pihak Ketiga Dalam Perkara Tata Usaha Negara. JA: Jurnal Al-Wasath, 3(1), 107–118. https://doi.org/10.47776/alwasath.v2i2.271
Zaman, M. N. U., & Simatupang, D. P. N. (2023). Pengecualian Objek Gugatan Tata Usaha Negara Dalam Keadaan Darurat Covid-19. Jurnal Hukum: Istinbath, 20(1), 136–154. https://ejournal.penerbitjurnal.com/index.php/law/article/view/285
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30659/akta.v13i1.50664
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Jurnal Akta has been indexed by:
Editorial Office: Jurnal Akta Room 2nd Floor Imam As Syafei Building Faculty of Law Universitas Islam Sultan Agung. Jln. Kaligawe KM. 4, Semarang City, Central Java, Indonesia.