The Imposition of Criminal Sanctions as an Ultimum Remedium in The Resolution of Consumer Protection Crime
Abstract
Consumer protection in Indonesia currently faces significant challenges, particularly regarding weak law enforcement and uncertainty in the application of criminal sanctions. Based on Law No. 8 of 1999 on Consumer Protection, criminal sanctions are applied as Ultimum Remedium, which complicates the process of obtaining justice for consumers who are harmed. This paper proposes a paradigm shift in the application of criminal sanctions by making them the primum remedium in resolving consumer criminal cases. This approach is expected to provide legal certainty, justice, and a deterrent effect on business actors who violate consumer rights. Additionally, the study suggests reconstructing several articles in the Consumer Protection Law, such as Articles 8, 9, 13 paragraph (2), 15, 17, 18, and Articles 62 and 63, to align with the evolving conditions of society, economy, and global trade. These changes aim to enhance the effectiveness of consumer protection and ensure better legal certainty for Indonesian society in the face of global legal developments related to consumer protection.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Alisya Fahira, (2024). “Perspektif Hukum Pidana Terhadap Perlindungan Konsumen Atas Peredaran Air Minum Dalam Kemasan”, Jurnal Rechtswetenschap : Jurnal Mahasiswa Hukum, Vol 1 No 1,
Adde Riyatna Harahap, (2011). “Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Konsumen Akibat Iklan yang Menyesatkan”, Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Muhammadiyah Sumatera Utara
Butje Tampi, (2011). “Penyelesaian Sengketa Konsumen Berdasarkan Hukum Acara Pidana”, Karya Ilmiah, Kementrian Pendidikan Nasional Universitas Sam Ratulangi Fakultas Hukum Manado,
Denny Lumbantobing and Taufik Siregar, (2012). “Perlindungan Hukum Pidana Terhadap Konsumen Bidang Pangan”, Jurnal Mercatoria, Vol. 5 No. 2,
Dellyana, Shant, (2010). Konsep Penegakan Hukum, PT:Liberty, Yogyakarta,
Janus Sidabolok. (2010). Hukum Perlindungan Konsumen di Indonesia, PT. Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung,
Lawrence M Friedman, (1975), The Legal System A Social Science Perspektive, New York: Russell Sage Foundation,
Niniek Suparni, (1996). Eksistensi Pidana Denda Dalam Sistem Pidana & Pemidanaan, Jakarta: Sinar Grafika,
Petrus Richard Sianturi, (2020) “Pembalikan Beban Pembuktian Sebagai Primum remedium Dalam Upaya Pengembalian Aset Negara Pada Kasus Tindak Pidana Korupsi”, Simbur Cahaya Fakultas Hukum Universitas Sriwijaya,
R Sri Soemantri Martosoewignyo, (1992). Bunga Rampai Hukum Tata Negara Indonesia Bandung: Alumni,
Surya Nita, (2017). “Peran Bpsk Medan Dalam Memberikan Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap konsumen yang dirugikan akibat Pencabutan Meteran Listrik”, Jurnal Hukum Responsif, Vol.5, No.5,
Tjokorda Gde Indraputra and Ni Nyoman Juwita Arsawati, (2019), “Penyelesaian Tindak Pidana Di Bidang Perlindungan Konsumen Dengan Menggunakan Pendekatan Nilai-Nilai Keadilan Restoratif (Dengan Mekanisme Mediasi Penal)”, Jurnal Analisis Hukum, Volume 2, Nomor 1, April
Yahya Abdul Habib and Jacobus Jopie Gilalo, (2024). “Penyelesaian & Sanksi Atas Tindak Pidana Konsumen Terhadap Kejahatan Pelaku Usaha”, Jurnal IBLAM LAW REVIEW, Vol.4, No.2,
https://prolegal.id/kasus-minyakita-begini-hak-konsumen-dan-sanksi-bagi-produsen-nakal/, accessed on 20 March 2025, at 20.00 WIB, Medan
https://www.cnnindonesia.com/ekonomi/20210115135836-92-594181/kronologi-grab-toko-tipu-980-orang-dan-rugikan-rp17-m, accessed on 20 March 2025, at 20.00 WIB, Medan
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30659/akta.v12i2.45075
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2025 JURNAL AKTA
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Jurnal Akta has been indexed by:
Editorial Office: Jurnal Akta Room 2nd Floor Imam As Syafei Building Faculty of Law Universitas Islam Sultan Agung. Jln. Kaligawe KM. 4, Semarang City, Central Java, Indonesia. Phone +62 24 6583584 Fax +62 24 6582455
Email: jurnalakta@unissula.ac.id