The Principle of Proportional Contracting in Sharia Bank Financing Contracts in Optical Maqasid Sharia

Taufik Kurrohman

Abstract


The principle of proportionality in Sharia financing contracts upholds equality. The manifestation of equality cannot be seen mathematically but is oriented towards legal equality. The same proportion in the contractual relationship between the parties is manifested in the clauses of the agreement contract. Contractual justice can be realized with two approaches to value: the first is a technical approach that focuses on freedom of will in a contract, and the second is a substantial approach that is reflected in the clauses of the contract. Both approaches will reflect the contract proportionally and distort the dominance of freedom of contract. The method of binding sharia banks which is relatively the same as conventional banks, is one of the factors that builds the perspective of the community that sharia banks are the same as conventional banks but ignores the differentiating meaning of sharia banks is the content of the contract clauses based on sharia principles, especially fiqh muamalat. The research method was conducted descriptively and analytically with a normative legal approach. The results of the study show that first, the principle of proportional contracting based on maqasid sharia can be realized with a balance of risk and benefit (al qurmu bilgurmi), educating individuals is realized with professionalism, transparency, and honesty (dar'ul mafasid aula min jalbil manafi), and the realization of actualized benefits through supervision of sharia contract products based on sharia compliance. Second, the application of the principle of proportionality in contracting in sharia financing contracts is not by maqasid sharia, this is reflected in the major premise of the clause of the sharia bank financing contract such as the mechanism for paying obligations, tax deductions, providing collateral guarantees, breach of promise and clauses of negligence of guarantee statements and clauses of accelerated repayment deductions.


Keywords


Banking; Contract; Financial; Proportionality; Sharia.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Alam, M. K., Islam, F. T., & Runy, M. K. (2021). Why does Shariah governance framework important for Islamic banks? In Asian Journal of Economics and Banking (Vol. 5, Issue 2). https://doi.org/10.1108/ajeb-02-2021-0018

Antara, P., & Dan, P. A. (2018). Konsep Maqashid Al-Syari `ah : 5(1), 47–62.

Asikin, N., Abdul, B., Ahmad, S. Bin, Zakaria, Z. Bin, & Wira, A. (2025). Sharia Governance and Risk Mitigation in E-Wallets : Implications for SDG 8. 125–146.

Asyiqin, I. Z. (2025). Legal Relationship Between Fund Depositors And Managing Banks In Mudharabah Deposit At Islamic Banks. 10(1), 112–126.

Hadjon, P. M. (1994). Pengkajian Ilmu Hukum Dogmatik (Normatif). Yuridika, 8(1), 2.

Hamid, A., & Putra, D. (2021). The Practice of Buying and Selling During Friday Prayer in Mandailing District Natal: A Study With A Maqashid Al-Syari’ah Approach. Samarah, 5(2), 1021–1043. https://doi.org/10.22373/sjhk.v5i2.7575

Hernoko, A. Y. (2016). Asas Proporsionalitas Sebagai Landasan Pertukaran Hak Dan Kewajiban Para Pihak Dalam Kontrak Komersial / The Principle Of Proportionality As The Basis Exchange Rights And Obligations Of The Parties In The Commercial Contract. Jurnal Hukum Dan Peradilan, 5(3), 447–466.

Imaniyati, N. S., & Adam, P. (2017). The Fatwa Position Of Dsn-Mui In The National Banking System. MIMBAR, Jurnal Sosial Dan Pembangunan, 33(1), 142. https://doi.org/10.29313/mimbar.v33i1.2128

Islam, J. H. (2024). Al-Istinbath. 9(1), 155–192.

Jamaluddin, Hayat, M., Masduki, Mukarromah, O., & Jamaludin. (2024). Examining the Synthesis of Islamic Commercial Principles and Local Customary Practices: A Case Study of Nyambut Sawah Traditions in Tejamari, Banten. Journal of Islamic Law, 5(1), 86–104. https://doi.org/10.24260/jil.v5i1.2091

Jonas Christoffersen. (2009). Fair Balance: Proportionality, Subsidiarity and Primarity in the European Convention on Human Rights. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.

Judith Gardam. (2004). Nesessity, Proportionality and The Use of Force by States. Camridge University Press.

Karbhari, Y., Alam, M. K., & Rahman, M. M. (2020). Relevance of the application of institutional theory in Shariah governance of Islamic banks. PSU Research Review, 5(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1108/PRR-05-2020-0015

Malang, M., Sciences, M., Islamic, I., Sciences, M., & Islamic, I. (2025). A Maqasid -Based Welfare Index In Indonesia : An Empirical Investigation. 11(1), 119–146.

Marzuki, P. M. (2005). Penelitian Hukum.

Moqbel, T., & Ahmed, H. (2020). Flexibility and Sharī’ah compliance of islamic financial contracts: An evaluative framework. Arab Law Quarterly, 35(12), 92–115. https://doi.org/10.1163/15730255-BJA10052

Muflih, M., Zen, M., Purbayati, R., Kristianingsih, K., Karnawati, H., Iswanto, B., & Juniwati, E. H. (2024). Customer loyalty to Islamic mobile banking: evaluating the roles of justice theory, religiosity, satisfaction and trust. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 42(3), 571–595.

Putra, D., Harahap, S. M., & Edi, S. (2023). Islamic Legal Analysis of Bank Interest Allocation on Social Fund: a Case Study of Small Credit Bank (Bpr) Nbp 21 Panyabungan City. Al-Risalah: Forum Kajian Hukum Dan Sosial Kemasyarakatan, 23(2), 240–257. https://doi.org/10.30631/alrisalah.v23i2.1442

Rukhmana, T., Darwis, D., IP, S., Alatas, A. R., Tarigan, W. J., Mufidah, Z. R., Arifin, M., Cahyadi, N., & ST, S. (2022). Metode penelitian kualitatif. CV Rey Media Grafika.

Smith, S. A., & Atiyah, P. S. (2006). Atiyah’s Introduction to the Law of Contract. OUP Oxford.

Sodiqin, A. (2025). Religion and Science : Analysing Medical Fatwas of the Majelis Ulama Indonesia ( 2010 – 2021 ). 6(1), 1–20.

Syamsuar, Chapakia, A. O., Hamsa, A., & Amelia. (2024). Integration of Maqashid Syaria in Nurcholish Madjid’s Thingking about Principles for Effective Good Governance. Al-Istinbath: Jurnal Hukum Islam, 9(1), 45–62. https://doi.org/10.29240/jhi.v9i1.9701

Yulianto, R. A., & Mufid, A. (2025). Ahkam : Jurnal Ilmu Syariah The Principle of Proportionality in Armed Conflict under International Law and Islam. 25(1), 105–124.

Zulfikar, & Fuady, K. (2021). Habib Ahmed’s maqāṣid sharī`ah concept on cooperative regulations in Indonesia. Ijtihad: Jurnal Wacana Hukum Islam Dan Kemanusiaan, 21(2), 247–272. https://doi.org/10.18326/IJTIHAD.V21I2.247-272




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30659/akta.v12i3.44869

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2025 JURNAL AKTA

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.


Jurnal Akta has been indexed by:

Editorial Office: Jurnal Akta Room 2nd Floor Imam As Syafei Building Faculty of Law Universitas Islam Sultan Agung. Jln. Kaligawe KM. 4, Semarang City, Central Java, Indonesia. Phone +62 24 6583584 Fax +62 24 6582455

Phone: 024-6583584 (574)
Email: jurnalakta@unissula.ac.id

Creative Commons License

JURNAL AKTA (eISSN : 2581-2114, pISSN: 2406-9426), This work is licensed under a Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).