The Principles of Good Faith in E-Contract Financial Technology

Dora Kusumastuti, Sutoyo Sutoyo

Abstract


This research discusses the Principle of Good Faith in E-Contract Financial Technology, which is a relatively new type of agreement in Indonesia. An e-contract can be formed when there is an agreement or mutual consent between the parties involved in the contract during its drafting. The existence of an e-contract is a new development in modern contract types, requiring appropriate regulation based on clear legal foundations. However, in practice, current regulations are not yet able to fully protect the parties involved in e-contracts. Therefore, in the creation of e-contracts, it is necessary to have a controlling mechanism based on moral values and conscience, commonly known as the principle of good faith, to support the principle of freedom of contract. The principle of good faith is considered the most important (super eminent principle) in contracts. Given the various issues that arise, this research aims to discuss the importance of the principle of good faith in e-contract financial technology. This subject research is E-Contract Financial Technology, method research used is normative juridical, with data sourced from secondary data, analyzed using deductive logic. The research results indicate that the principle of good faith needs to be applied and instilled in the parties involved in the contract, namely business actors, in this case, fintech providers, and consumers as fintech users. This principle ensures that the contract's substance is carried out based on solid trust or confidence, as well as the good will of the parties involved. By applying the principle of good faith to the parties involved, the risk of wanprestatie on the part of any party can be minimized, as there is already a foundation of trust and good will.


Keywords


E-Contracts; Faith; Financial; Technology.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Amirrudin, & Asikin, Z. (2004). Pengantar Metode Penelitian Hukum. Raja Grafindo Persada.

Ariyanto, A. (2016). Perbandingan Asas Iktikad Baik: Dalam Perjanjian Menurut Sistem Hukum Civil Law (Eropa Continental) Dan Common Law (Anglosaxon). Jurnal Komunikasi Hukum (JKH), 2(2), 114–126. https://doi.org/10.23887/jkh.v2i2.8409

Basrowi. (2019). ANALISIS ASPEK DAN UPAYA PERLINDUNGAN KONSUMEN FINTECHSYARIAH. LEX LIBRUM : JURNAL ILMU HUKUM, 5, 959–980.

Basuki, F. H., & Husein, H. (2018). ANALISIS SWOT FINANCIAL TECHNOLOGY PADA DUNIA PERBANKAN DI KOTA AMBON (Survei Pada Bank di Kota Ambon). Manis: Jurnal Manajemen Dan Bisnis, 1(2), 60–74. https://doi.org/10.30598/manis.1.2.60-74

Financial Technology dan Lembaga Keuangan, Yogyakarta: Gathering Mitra Linkage Bank Syariah Mandiri, (2016).

Innaka, A., Rusdiana, S., & Sularto, M. (2013). Penerapan Asas Itikad Baik Tahap Prakontraktual Pada Perjanjian Jual Beli Perumahan. Mimbar Hukum - Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada, 24(3), 504. https://doi.org/10.22146/jmh.16122

Khairandy, R. (2001). Pembaharuan Hukum Kontrak sebagai Antisipasi Transaksi Elektronik Commerce. Hukum UII, 43.

Khairandy, R. (2009). Makna, Tolok Ukur dan Sikap Pengadilan di Indonesia terhadap Iktikad Baik dalam Pelaksanaan Kontrak. Hukum, 16, 51–71.

Kusumastuti, D. (2014). Kebebasan Berkontrak Dalam Kontrak Baku Kredit Perumahan. Widya Wacana, 9(1), 34–39.

Kusumastuti, D. (2016). Perjanjian Kredit Perbankan dalam Perspektif Welfare State. Dee Publish.

Kusumastuti, D. (2022). The Prudential Banking Principles in Providing Subsidized Housing Loans. Jurnal Akta, 9(3), 302. https://doi.org/10.30659/akta.v9i3.22556

Kusumastuti, D., & Ishwara, A. S. S. (2023). Kedudukan Hukum Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) Digital: Implikasi dan Orientasi dalam Perspektif Hukum Inklusif. Jurnal Ius Constituendum, 8(3), 494. https://doi.org/10.26623/jic.v8i3.7492

Miftah, A. (2020). Membangun Konsep Ideal Penerapan Asas Iktikad Baik Dalam Hukum Perjanjian. Jurnal Ius Constituendum, 66(5), 1.

Miswan, A. (2019). Perkembangan Dan Dampak Financial Technology (Fintech) Terhadap Industri Keuangan Syariah Di Jawa Tengah. Skripsi, 1, 105–112.

Muhtarom, M. (2014). Asas - Asas Hukum Perjanjian : Suatu Landasan Dalam Pembuatan Kontrak. Suhuf, 26(1), 48–56.

Napitupulu, S. K., Rubini, A. F., Khasanah, K., & Rachmawati, A. D. (2017). Kajian Perlindungan Konsumen Sektor Jasa Keuangan: Perlindungan Konsumen Pada Fintech. Departemen Perlindungan Konsumen, Otoritas Jasa Keuangan, 86.

Nining, L. (2012). Prinsip Tanggung Jawab Pelaku Usaha Dalam Transaksi Elektronik Menurut Undang-Undang Informasi Dan Transaksi Elektronik. Jurnal Ekonomi & Bisnis PNJ, 11(2), 73.

Priyono, E. A. (2017). PERANAN ASAS ITIKAD BAIK DALAM KONTRAK BAKU (Upaya Menjaga Keseimbangan bagi Para Pihak). Diponegoro Private Law Review, 1(1), 13–22.

Putra, G. N. A., & I Made Dedy Priyanto. (2020). Asas IktikadIktikad Baik Dalam Memperkuat Kekuatan Mengikat Memorandum of Understanding. Jurnal Kertha Semaya, 8(3).

Saptono, Ernama Budiharto, H. (2016). Pengawasan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan Terhadap Financial Technology. In Peraturan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan Nomor 77/POJK.01/2016.

Yudha, A. (2010). Hukum Perjanjian : Asas Proposionalitas dalam Kontrak Komersial. Kencana Media Grup.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30659/akta.v11i4.40060

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 JURNAL AKTA

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.


Jurnal Akta has been indexed by:

Editorial Office: Jurnal Akta Room 2nd Floor Imam As Syafei Building Faculty of Law Universitas Islam Sultan Agung. Jln. Kaligawe KM. 4, Semarang City, Central Java, Indonesia. Phone +62 24 6583584 Fax +62 24 6582455

Phone: 024-6583584 (574)
Email: jurnalakta@unissula.ac.id

Creative Commons License

JURNAL AKTA (eISSN : 2581-2114, pISSN: 2406-9426), This work is licensed under a Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).