Supervision and Law Enforcement of Business Competition in the Digital Industry (Case Study of Predatory Pricing Practices in the TikTok Shop)
Abstract
The one of problems that should be resolved is predatory pricing that occurs in the digital industry which is always in the spotlight in Indonesian society. KPPU is an independent institution established based on Law No. 5 of 1999 concerning the prohibition of monopoly and unfair business competition which has the authority to supervise and enforce legal business competition practices. The KPPU was asked to be more proactive in investigating predatory pricing in e-commerce, one of which is TikTok Shop. The entry of imported goods in the TikTok Shop which are sold at prices much lower than the cost of local products and flash sale platforms is troubling MSME business actors because it can kill the MSME market which will be the focus of the discussion in this research. The national economic system, which includes elements of business competition, has not been built under the standards of prosperous and fair business competition. Regulations governing business competition in the digital industry must also be carefully considered. KPPU still faces big problems with predatory pricing. Because the market is different from conventional industries, current rules may need to be adjusted to stop anti-competitive practices. E-commerce regulations are still lacking to ensure law enforcement against false pricing practices. The TikTok Shop case is a valuable lesson for authorities and other stakeholders in facing new challenges emerging in the digital industry. Competitors affected by this practice may experience significant financial losses, while customers may benefit in the short term, but in the long term they are at risk.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Journals:
Panjaitan, Yohanna Ameilya, (2021),“Indikasi Predatory Pricing Pada Praktik Perang Harga Antara Pelaku Usaha Financial Technology (FINTECH) Ditinjau Berdasarkan Hukum Persaingan Usaha Di Indonesia”, Dharmasisya, Vol.1, No.3, p.1615-1630.
Nazhari, Akhmad Farhan & Naufal Irkham, (2023). “Analisis Dugaan Praktik Predatory Pricing & Penyalahgunaan Posisi Dominan Dalam Industri E-Commerce”, Jurnal Persaingan Usaha,Vol.3,No.1, p.19-31.
Zahra, Zakia ,et.al, (2023), “Analisis “Predatory Pricing” Tiktok Shop di Tengah Pemanfaatan Media Sosial Bagi UMKM Di Indonesia, Seminar Nasional Universitas Negeri Surabaya, p.1022-1030.
Narusweta, Arasyel Noor Vinki & Diana Setiawati, (2024), “Alleged Predatory Pricing Through Flash Sale Practices On The Tiktok Shop Application”, Delegalata Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Vol.9,No.1, p.31-41.
Mantili, Rai, et.al, (2016), “Problematika Penegakan Hukum Persaingan Usaha di Indonesia Dalam Rangka Menciptakan Kepastian Hukum”, Padjajaran Jurnal Ilmu Hukum,Vol.3,No.1, p.116-132.
Alkautsar,Izzy, (2024), “Memaknai Persaingan Usaha Yang Berkeadilan & Menyejahterakan Dalam Perspektif Keadilan Sosial”, Yurispruden Jurnal Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Malang,Vol.7,No.1, p.59-79.
Effendi, Basri, (2020), “Pengawasan & Penegakan Hukum Terhadap Bisnis Digital (E-Commerce) Oleh Komisi Pengawas Persaingan Usaha (KPPU) Dalam Praktek Persaingan Tidak Sehat”, Syiah Kuala Law Jurnal, Vol.4,No.1, p.21-32.
AP, Komaria Nur Aulia & Al Qodar Purwo Suliostyo, (2023), “The Role of The Business Competition Supervisory Commission In Response To Allegations Of Predatory Pricing Practices In E-Commerce,Peran Komisi Pengawas Persaingan Usaha Terhadap Adanya Dugaan Praktik Jual Rugi Pada E-Commerce”, Jurnal Geuthee: Penelitian Multidisiplin (Multidiciplinary Research), Vol.5,No.2, p.175-182.
Chandra, Alston & Sari Murti Widiyastuti Y, (2017), “Peran Komisi Pengawas Persaingan Usaha (KPPU) Dalam Mendorong Iklim Persaingan Usaha Yang Sehat Di Sektor Perunggasan”, Justitia Et Pax, Vol.33,No.1, p.1-11.
Andani, Deddy Kusuma & Didiek Wahyu Indarta, (2023), “Pengawasan Hukum Platform E-Commerce Tiktok & UMKM oleh KPPU Berdasarkan UU Nomor 5 Tahun 1999”, Al-Manhaj: Jurnal Hukum & Pranata Sosial Islam, Vol.5,No.2, p.2393-2408.
Sidauruk, Gloria Damaiyanti, (2021), “Kepastian Hukum Putusan Komisi Persaingan Usaha Dalam Penegakan Hukum Persaingan Usaha”, Lex Renaissan, Vol.6,No.1, p.132-151.
Savier, Alem, et.al, (2023), “Fenomena Predatory Pricing Dalam Persaingan Usaha di E-Commerce (Studi Kasus Antara penetapan Tarif Bawah Antara Aplikasi Indrive & Gojek), Jurnal Ilmiah Wahana Pendidikan, Vol.9,No.14, p.64-77.
Muna, Kholifatul & Budi Santoso, (2024), “ Regulasi Izin Perdagangan Tiktok Shop Sebagai Fitur Tambahan Aplikasi Tiktok di Indonesia, Regulation of Tiktok Shop Trading License As An Additional Feature Of TikTok Shop App In Indonesia”, Jurnal USM Law Review, Vol.7,No.1, p.412-428.
Agitta , Rimarsha & Putu Ade Harriestha Martana, (2020), “Perang Tarif Penyedia Layanan Ojek Dalam Jaringan Perspektif Hukum persaingan Usaha Di Indonesia”, Jurnal Kertha Semaya, Vol.9,No.1, p.92-101.
Books:
Soekanto, Soerjono, (1983). Faktor-faktor yang Mempengaruhi Penegakkan Hukum, Jakarta: Rajawali
Hanitjo Soemitro, Ronny, (1990). Metodologi Penelitian Hukum & Jurimetri, Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia
Soekanto, Soerjono & Sria Mamudi, (2004). Penelitian Hukum Normatif Suatu Tinjauan Singkat, Jakarta, PT.Raja Grafindo Persada
Jimly Asshiddiqie, (2008). Perkembangan & Konsolidasi Lembaga Negara Pasca Reformasi, Jakarta: Konpres
Website:
Elsa Catriana, Elsa & Aprillia Ika, “Nakalnya” Seller TiktokShop, Kemenkop UKM Temukan Masih Ada “Predatory Pricing” & Penjualan Pakaian Impor Bekas”, https://money.kompas.com/read/2024/02/29/091000526/-nakalnya-seller-tiktok-shop-kemenkop-ukm-temukan-masih-ada-predatory-pricing accessed on 23 April 2024.
Gading, Samuel, “Fakta-fakta Tiktok Diduga Lakukan Predatory Pricing”, https://finance.detik.com/berita-ekonomi-bisnis/d-6915517/fakta-fakta-tiktok-diduga-lakukan-predatory-pricing, accessed on 26 April 2024.
Catriana, Elsa & Aprillia Ika, “KPPU Pelajari Dugaan “Preadatory Pricing” di Tiktok Shop”, https://money.kompas.com/read/2023/09/05/060600526/kppu-pelajari-dugaan-predatory-pricing-di-tiktok-shop accessed on 23 April 2024.
Rachmawati, Dwi, “Migrasi Tiktok Shop Rampung, Tokopedia Komitmen Perangi Predatory Pricing”, https://ekonomi.bisnis.com/read/20240403/12/1755144/migrasi-tiktok-shop-rampung-tokopedia-komitmen-perangi-predatory-pricing accessed on 27 April 2024.
Rizaldi,Bagus Ahmad, “Kemendag Luruskan Tiktok Shop Tidak Ditutup Tapi Ditata”, https://www.antaranews.com/berita/3838821/kemendag-luruskan-tiktok-shop-tidak-ditutup-tapi-ditata accessed on 27 April 2024.
Catarina, Elsa & Erlangga Djumena, “Kata Bos Tokopedia Soal Dugaan “Predatory Pricing” Di Tiktok Shop”, https://money.kompas.com/read/2024/04/03/201200726/kata-bos-tokopedia-soal-dugaan-predatory-pricing-di-tiktok-shop accessed on 27 April 2024.
Rachmawati, Dinda, “Apa itu Predatory Pricing?Istilah yang Diungkapkan Presiden Jokowi?Saat Tau Ada Baju Impor Seharga Rp 5 Ribu di E-Commerce”, https://www.suara.com/lifestyle/2023/10/07/071000/apa-itu-predatory-pricing-istilah-yang-diungkap-presiden-jokowi-saat-tahu-ada-baju-impor-seharga-rp5-ribu-di-e-commerce accessed on 28 April 2024.
Regulation:
Law No. 5 of 1999 concerning Prohibition of Monopolistic Practices and Unfair Business Competition.
Minister of Trade Regulation No.31 of 2023 concerning Business Licensing, Advertising, Guidance and Supervision of Business Actors in Trading through Electronic Systems.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30659/akta.v11i1.37129
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2024 JURNAL AKTA
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Jurnal Akta has been indexed by:
Editorial Office: Jurnal Akta Room 2nd Floor Imam As Syafei Building Faculty of Law Universitas Islam Sultan Agung. Jln. Kaligawe KM. 4, Semarang City, Central Java, Indonesia. Phone +62 24 6583584 Fax +62 24 6582455
Email: jurnalakta@unissula.ac.id