Independence of the General Election Commission and Election Supervisory Board for Democratic Elections
Abstract
The Constitution explicitly states that to achieve the national ideals and objectives, General Elections need to be held to elect members of the People's Representative Council, members of the Regional Representative Council, the President and Vice President, and to elect members of the Regional People's Representative Council, as a means of realizing the sovereignty of the people and producing representatives of the people and a democratic state government based on Pancasila and the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia. The organizers of elections, as regulated in Law Number 7 of 2017 concerning General Elections, are stated to be the Election Commission, the Election Supervisory Body, and the Council of Election Organizer Honor as a unified function of Election Organization. Doubts about the independence of the general election commission continue to be questioned by parties who dislike the results obtained; political narratives and cheating issues are always attached to the general election commission. The purpose of this study is to determine the role of the General Election Commission as the organizer of elections in creating a Just and Fair Election (Direct, Free, and Secret). And how the role of the Election Supervisory Board in carrying out Supervision and Implementation of laws. This study uses a descriptive quantitative approach, where data is based on survey results, document reviews, and observations. The results showed that the competence and independence of the General Election Organizers significantly influence the success of the election stages.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Ali, Z. (2021). Metode penelitian hukum. Sinar Grafika.
Asshiddiqie, J. (2006). Perkembangan dan konsolidasi Lembaga Negara Pasca reformasi/Prof. Dr. Jimly Asshiddiqie, SH.
Gaffar, A. (1919). Politik Indonesia: transisi menuju demokrasi. -.
Gottehrer, D., & Hostina, M. (1998). Essential characteristics of a classical Ombudsman. United States Ombudsman Association. Available Online (Website Last Visited May 28, 2003) at: Http://VvWW. Usornbudsrnan. Org/References/Essential. PDF.
Maki, K. I. (2020). Kewenangan Dewan Kehormatan Penyelenggara Pemilu Republik Indonesia Dalam Memutus Pelanggaran Kode Etik. Lex Administratum, 8(4).
Nasution, A. B. (2004). Pergulatan tanpa henti: pahit getir merintis demokrasi.
Rajab, A. (2018). Act Number 7 Of 2017 on General Election for Securing Free, Fair, and Peaceful General Election for National Stability and Prosperity. Indonesian Law Journal, 11, 45–62.
Sahdan, G. (2004). Jalan transisi demokrasi pasca Soeharto. Pondok Edukasi.
Schumpeter, J. A. (2013). Capitalism, socialism and democracy. routledge.
Soekanto, S. (2006). Pengantar penelitian hukum. (No Title).
Soekanto, S. (2007). Penelitian hukum normatif: Suatu tinjauan singkat.
Sunggono, B. (2003). Metodologi Penelitian Hukum, PT. Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta.
Surbakti, R. (2003). Demokrasi Menurut Pendekatan Kelembagaan Baru. Jurnal. Ilmu Pemerintah, Edisi, 19.
Ujan, A. A. (2001). Keadilan dan Demokrasi: Telaah Filsafat Politik John Rawls. Kanisius, Yogyakarta.
Zakaria, F. (2007). The future of freedom: illiberal democracy at home and abroad (Revised Edition). WW Norton & company.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30659/akta.v11i2.36375
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2024 JURNAL AKTA
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Jurnal Akta has been indexed by:
Editorial Office: Jurnal Akta Room 2nd Floor Imam As Syafei Building Faculty of Law Universitas Islam Sultan Agung. Jln. Kaligawe KM. 4, Semarang City, Central Java, Indonesia. Phone +62 24 6583584 Fax +62 24 6582455
Email: jurnalakta@unissula.ac.id