The Malpractice Administration Procedure in the Vortex of Crime: An Indonesian Perspective and Its Comparison with Other Countries

Yeni Nuraeni, Alfies Sihombing Sihombing

Abstract


Medical malpractice has become a complex issue that extends to criminal law, having serious implications for health practitioners and patients. The legal argument in determining the elements of negligence and medical malpractice is based on the difference in interpretation between ordinary criminal offenses regulated in the KUHP and medical criminal offenses. Th e aim of this study is to explain the theory and legal analysis related to the handling of medical malpractice cases in Indonesia and its comparison with other countries. This research uses normative juridic methods. The outcome of this study is the need for reforms in handling alleged medical malpractice cases in Indonesia by considering the paradigms and concepts of other countries to protect patient rights and improve the quality of health services in reducing the risk of malpractice in Indonesia.

Keywords


Health; Malpractice; Medical; Negligence.

Full Text:

PDF

References


see the Original Document




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30659/akta.v11i2.34556

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 JURNAL AKTA

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.


Jurnal Akta has been indexed by:

Editorial Office: Jurnal Akta Room 2nd Floor Imam As Syafei Building Faculty of Law Universitas Islam Sultan Agung. Jln. Kaligawe KM. 4, Semarang City, Central Java, Indonesia. Phone +62 24 6583584 Fax +62 24 6582455

Phone: 024-6583584 (574)
Email: jurnalakta@unissula.ac.id

Creative Commons License

JURNAL AKTA (eISSN : 2581-2114, pISSN: 2406-9426), This work is licensed under a Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).