The Legal Protection of Fiduciary Guarantee Recipients & Resolution of Tort Disputes in the Fiduciary Guarantee Agreement at PT Astrido Pacific Finance

Indah Pratiwi Widyaningrum

Abstract


This research aims to examine the legal protection mechanism for recipients of fiduciary guarantees, such as PT Astrido Pacific Finance, in their business practices and to analyze the mechanism for resolving default disputes that can arise in fiduciary guarantee agreements. This research uses normative juridical research methods with a descriptive approach. The data used is secondary data consisting of primary and secondary legal materials. The results of this research show the importance of clarity in laws and regulations related to fiduciary guarantees to provide strong legal protection for recipients of fiduciary guarantees. In addition, a good understanding of the mechanism for resolving default disputes is needed to maintain stability and fairness in fiduciary transactions. It is hoped that the results of this research will provide guidance for PT Astrido Pacific Finance and contribute to the development of legal science in Indonesia.


Keywords


Dispute; Fiduciary; Guarantee; Protection; Resolution.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Journals:

Lubis, Aditya Nabilah., Perlawanan Pihak Ketiga Sebagai Pemilik Benda Terhadap Benda Yang Dijadikan Jaminan Fidusia Tanpa Persetujuan Pemilik Benda (Studi Kasus: Putusan Mahkamah Agung 1012 K/PDT/2021). Lex Patrimonium, Vol. 1, No. 1 (2022).

Sembiring, Sentosa. (2007). Arti Penting Jaminan dalam Pemberian Kredit dalam Transaksi Bisnis Perbankan. Gloria Juris, Vol. 7, No. 1 (2007).

Sidabariba, Yogi, Et al., Penyerahan Hak Milik Atas Objek Fidusia Berdasarkan Constitium Possessorium”. Lex Privatum, Vol. IX, No. 8, (2021)

Books:

Asyhadie, Zaeni, dan Kusumawati, Rahma. (2018). Hukum Jaminan di Indonesia. Depok: Rajawali Press.

Efendi, Jonaedi, et. Al,. (2018). Kamus Istilah Hukum Populer. Jakarta: Kencana.

Hadisoeprapto, Hartono. (2004). Pokok-Pokok Hukum Perikatan dan Hukum Jaminan. Yogyakarta: Liberty.

Prajitno, Andi. (2011). Hukum Fidusia : Problematika Yuridis Pemberlakuan UU No.42 Tahun 1999. Malang: Bayumedia.

Satrio, J. (2007). Hukum Jaminan Hak Jaminan Kebendaan. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti.

_______. (2021). Hukum Jaminan Hak Jaminan Kebendaan Fidusia, (Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti.

Sofyan, S. S. Masjchoen. (1980). Hukum Jaminan di Indonesia, Pokok-Pokok Hukum Jaminan dan Jaminan Perorangan, Cet. 1. Yogyakarta: Liberty.

_____________________. (2000). Hukum Perdata: Hukum Benda, Yogyakarta: Liberty.

Supianto, Hukum Jaminan Fidusia, (Yogyakarta: Garudhawaca, 2015), hlm. 47

Widjaja, Gunawan, dan Yani, Ahmad. (2000). Jaminan Fidusia, Jakarta: Rajagrafindo Persada.

Regulations:

Law on Fiduciary Guarantees, Law Number 42 of 1999, LN of 1999 No. 168, TLN No. 3889.

Civil Code [Burgerlijke Wetboek], translated by R. Soebekti and R. Tjitrosidibio.

Court Decision:

Constitutional Court, Decision no. 18/PUU.XVII/2019, Aprilliani Dewi and Suri Agung Prabowo (Petitioners) (2019).




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30659/akta.v10i3.34104

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2023 JURNAL AKTA

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Jurnal Akta has been indexed by:

Editorial Office: Jurnal Akta Room 2nd Floor Imam As Syafei Building Faculty of Law Universitas Islam Sultan Agung. Jln. Kaligawe KM. 4, Semarang City, Central Java, Indonesia. Phone +62 24 6583584 Fax +62 24 6582455

Phone: 024-6583584 (574)
Email: jurnalakta@unissula.ac.id

Creative Commons License

JURNAL AKTA (eISSN : 2581-2114, pISSN: 2406-9426), This work is licensed under a Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).