The Cartel Proof in Business Competition Law: From the Rule of Reason to Per Se Illegal

Anak Agung Gede Duwira Hadi Santosa, Lily Karuna Dewi, Ni Ketut Ngetis Megi Megayani

Abstract


Per se illegal approach is used to deal with cartel cases, which emphasises that cartel acts that have fulfilled the elements in the formulation of the article and are proven to violate the regulation without the need to prove the impact of such acts so that the enforcement of cartels can be resolved more quickly. This article intends to review and evaluate the Anti-Monopoly Law and PUTS in Indonesia regarding how the rule of reason approach is used to handle cartel cases in Indonesia. The research uses the normative method, namely legal research by processing library materials or secondary data. This article suggests that the more appropriate approach to handling cartel cases in Indonesia is the per se illegal approach, given that proving the act with this approach is easier and shorter to do so that the settlement of cartel cases can be resolved quickly. In addition, Indonesian civil procedure law does not yet recognise and regulate economic evidence, so economic evidence cannot be used to prove the case. Whereas economic evidence in the form of economic analysis of the impact of a cartel is mandatory in cartel settlement using the rule of reason approach. By evaluating the performance of the rule of reason in handling cartel cases in Indonesia, this article argues that it is important to change the wording of articles in the Anti-Monopoly Law and PUTS in Indonesia which previously used the rule of reason approach in handling cartel cases to apply the per se illegal approach.


Keywords


Cartel; Per Se Illegal; Performances; Rule.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Journals:

Al Qindy, F. H. (2018). Kajian Hukum Terhadap Kasus Kartel Minyak Goreng Di Indonesia (Studi Putusan KPPU Nomor 24/KPPU-1/2009). Jurnal Hukum Bisnis Bonum Commune, 1(1). DOI: 10.30996/jhbbc.v0i0.1755.

Aryadiputra, D., Pribadi, D. S., & Subroto, A. (2022). Perbedaan Penerapan Pendekaran Per se Illegal dan Rule of Reason dalam Putusan KPPU tentang Kartel Penetapan Harga. Risalah Hukum, 18(1). DOI: 10.30872/risalah.v18i1.753.

Fachri, F., & Joesoef, I. E. (2021). Pertimbangan KPPU Terhadap Pelanggaran Persaingan Usaha Tidak Sehat Dilakukan Oleh Perusahaan Penerbangan BUMN (Studi Kasus Putusan No. 15/KPPU-I/2019). Zaaken: Journal of Civil and Business Law, 2(1). DOI: 10.22437/zaaken.v2i1.11652.

Jawani, L. (2022). Prinsip Rule Of Reason Terhadap Praktik Dugaan Kartel Di Indonesia. Lex Renaissance, 7(1), 31-40. DOI: 10.20885/JLR.vol7.iss1.art3.

Nababan, R., & Saragih, J. (2020). Tinjauan Yuridis terhadap Perjanjian yang Dilarangdalam Undang-undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1999 Tentang Larangan Praktek Monopoli dan Persaingan Usaha Tidak Sehat yang Dilakukan oleh Pelaku Usaha Keramba Jaring Apung di Haranggaolhorison Kabupaten Simalungun. Visi Sosial Humaniora, 1 (2), 121-134.

Primandhika, M. P., & Artha, I. G. (2018). Analisis Penerapan Pendekatan Rule Of Reason Dan Per Se Illegal Terhadap Kasus Kartel Di Indonesia. Kertha Semaya: Journal Ilmu Hukum, 6 (7), 5-7.

Darmawan, S. A. (2022). Kekuatan Indirect Evidence Dalam Pembuktian Kasus Persekongkolan Tender dan Penerapannya di Dalam Proses Tender. Jurnal Pengadaan Barang dan Jasa, 1(1). DOI: 10.55961/jpbj.v1i1.7.

Books:

Cita Citrawinda. (2021) Hukum Persaingan Usaha, CV. Jakad Media Publishing.

Harahap, M. Y. (1997). Beberapa Tinjauan Tentang Permasalahan Hukum. Penerbit PT. Citra Aditya Bakti.

Soepadmo, N. R. (2020), Hukum Persaingan Usaha. Zifatama Jawara.

Rachmadi Usman, (2022), Hukum Persaingan Usaha di Indonesia, Sinar Grafika.

Rianto Adi, (2021), Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Edisi Revisi, Buku Obor

Rumadi Ahmad, M. Afif Hasbullah, dkk, (2020). Fikih Persaingan Usaha, Jakarta: Lakpesdam PBNU.

Sudiarto, (2021) Pengantar Hukum Persaingan Usaha Di Indonesia, Kencana.

Widhiyanti, H. N. (2022). Bayang-Bayang Kartel dalam Hukum Persaingan Usaha. Universitas Brawijaya Press.

Suraji, A. (2021). Dua Dekade Penegakan Hukum Persaingan: Perdebatan dan Isu yang Belum Terselesaikan. Jakarta: Komisi Pengawas Persaingan Usaha (KPPU) Republik Indonesia.

Internet:

Bisnis.com. “Ini Kronologi KPPU Temukan Dugaan Kartel Minyak Goreng”. https://ekonomi.bisnis.com/read/20220330/12/1516733/ini-kronologi-kppu-temukan-dugaan-kartel-minyak-goreng accessed on 30/3/2022.

Kompas.com. “RI Penghasil Sawit Terbesar Dunia, Tapi Harganya Diatur dari Malaysia”. https://money.kompas.com/read/2022/01/30/062749426/ri-penghasil-sawit-terbesar-dunia-tapi-harganya-diatur-dari-malaysia?page=all accessed on 31/01/2022.

Liputan 6. “Penyebab Kelangkaan Minyak Goreng dan Dugaan Praktik Kartel”. https://www.liputan6.com/regional/read/4904107/penyebab-kelangkaan-minyak-goreng-dan-dugaan-praktik-kartel. accessed on 7/4/2022.

Liputan 6.com. “Indonesia Jadi Eksportir Minyak Sawit Terbesar di Dunia”. https://www.liputan6.com/bisnis/read/4575604/indonesia-jadi-eksportir-minyak-sawit-terbesar-di-dunia. accessed on 07/06/2021.

Suara.com. “Kronologi Lengkap Kasus Korupsi Mafia Minyak Goreng, Sudah Dicurigai Sejak 2021”. https://www.suara.com/bisnis/2022/04/20/074621/kronologi-lengkap-kasus-korupsi-mafia-minyak-goreng-sudah-dicurigai-sejak-2021. accessed on 20/4/2022.

Tirto.id. “Kasus Dugaan Kartel Minyak Goreng, KPPU Ungkap Temuan Alat Bukti”. https://tirto.id/kasus-dugaan-kartel-minyak-goreng-kppu-ungkap-temuan-alat-bukti-gqrN. accessed on 30/3/2022.

Others:

Hanafi Rachman, “Per Se Illegal dan Rule of Reason dalam Undang-Undang Larangan Praktek Monopoli Dan Persaingan Usaha Tidak Sehat”, Skripsi, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, 2004.

Regulation:

Act No. 5 of 1999 concerning Prohibition of Monopolistic Practices and Unfair Business Competition.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30659/akta.v10i4.32005

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2023 Jurnal Akta

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Jurnal Akta has been indexed by:

Editorial Office: Jurnal Akta Room 2nd Floor Imam As Syafei Building Faculty of Law Universitas Islam Sultan Agung. Jln. Kaligawe KM. 4, Semarang City, Central Java, Indonesia. Phone +62 24 6583584 Fax +62 24 6582455

Phone: 024-6583584 (574)
Email: jurnalakta@unissula.ac.id

Creative Commons License

JURNAL AKTA (eISSN : 2581-2114, pISSN: 2406-9426), This work is licensed under a Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).