The Legal Strength of Notary Actions in the Implementation of Parate Execution towards Responsibility & Execution Rights to Fidusian Objects
Abstract
This research aims to: to find out howthe legal force of the notary deed in the application of the execution parate of the right of collateral and the parate of execution of the fiduciary object. The approach method in this research is empirical normative, the data source is obtained from the literature and the legal materials used are primary, secondary and tertiary legal materials which are then analyzed by means of qualitative analysis. Based on the results of data analysis, it can be concluded that the material rights fiduciary provides guarantees. The collateral object is tangible, intangible and immovable movable object which cannot be guaranteed with a mortgage. Fiduciary security is widely used by financing companies. The debtor in default, the leasing party executes the fiduciary object unilaterally, this is considered contrary to the 1945 Constitution. Article 15 paragraph (2) and Article 15 paragraph (3) Law No. 42 of 1999 concerning Fiduciary Guarantee is subject to a judicial review. Formulation of the problem, how the execution of fiduciary guarantees after the decision of the Constitutional Court No. 18 / PUU- XVII / 2019. Research method, using library research in the form of secondary data. This research is juridical normative and qualitative research type. The discussion after the decision of the Constitutional Court No. 18 / PUU-XVII / 2019 states that Article 15 paragraph (2) and Article 15 paragraph (3) of Act No. 42 of 1999 are contrary to the 1945 Constitution. Conclusion, before the Constitutional Court decision the execution of the object of fiduciary guarantee based on Article 29 of the Act No. 42 of 1999 concerning Fiduciary Guarantee. After the Decision of the Constitutional Court No. 18 / PUU-XVII / 2019 states that the collateral execution cannot be carried out unilaterally by the creditor, but must go through a decision of the District Court, unless there is an agreement regarding the default between the debtor and the creditor and the debtor voluntarily submits the object of fiduciary collateral.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Books:
Achmad Ali. (2004). Sosiologi Hukum, Kajian Empiris Terhadap Pengadilan. BP IBLAM, Jakarta, p. 19
Burhan Bungin. (2008). Penelitian Kualitatif (Komunikasi, Ekonomi, Kebijakan Publik, Dan Ilmu Sosial Lainnya), edisi 1, cet.2: Kencana Prenadamedia Group, Jakarta.
Cst Kansil, Christine S.t Kansil,Engelien R, palandeng dan Godlieb N mamahit, Kamus Istilah Hukum, (jakarta,JALA PERMATA AKSARA,2009)
Soetadyo Wignjosoebroto. (1994). dari Hukum Kolonial ke Hukum Nasional, Dinamika Sosial Politik dalam Perkembangan Hukum di Indonesia, Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta.
L.J van Apeldoorn dalam Shidarta, Moralitas Profesi Hukum Suatu Tawaran Kerangka Berfikir, (Bandung PT REVIKA ADITAMA,2006)
Mertokusumo S.H., Prof. Dr, Sudikno, (2002) Hukum Acara Perdata Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Liberty Yogyakarta
M. Yahya harahap, Pembahasan Permasalahan Dan Penerapan KUHP Penyidikan dan Penuntutan,(Jakarta, Sinar Grfika, 2002)
Muhammad Nazir. (1988). Metode Penelitian, Gp.ia Indonesia, Jakarta
Peter Mahmud Marzuki, 2010, Penelitian Hukum, Kencana, Jakarta
Philipus M. Hadjon. (1987). Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Rakyat di Indonesia. Bina Ilmu, Surabaya
Robert K. Yin, 2008, dalam bukunya yang berjudul Studi Kasus, Desain & Metode, Edisi 1, cet 12, Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta
Satjipto Rahardjo. (2006). Hukum Dalam Jagat Ketertiban, Jakarta: UKI Press
Satijipto Raharjo. (2000). Ilmu Hukum,. Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung
Soejono Soekamto dan Sri Mamudi. (1995). Penelitian Hukum Normatif Suatu Tinjauan Singkat, Jakarta, PT.Raja Grafindo Persada
Soerjono Soekamto. (1986). Pengantar Penelitian Hukum, Jakarta, UI Press
Shidarta. (2006). Moralitas Profesi Hukum Suatu Tawaran Kerangka Berfikir. Bandung: PT REVIKA ADITAMA
Sudikno Mertokusumo in H. Salim Hs. (2010). Perkembangan Teori Dalam Ilmu Hukum. Jakarta: PT RAJAGRAFINDO PERSADA
Sudikno Mertokusumo. (1991). Mengenal Hukum (Suatu Pengantar), Liberty, Yogyakarta
Sumadi Suryabrata. (1998). Metodologi Penelitian, Jakarta, Raja Gofindo
W.J.S. Poerwadarminta. (1986). Kamus Umum Bahasa Indonesia, Cet. IX, Balai Pustaka, Jakarta
Internet:
https://notarisarief.wordpress.com/2011/04/21/pembuktian-akta-otentik/.html accessed on 23 September 2019, at 3:20 a.m. WITA
http://lppm-unissula.com/jurnal.unissula.ac.id/index.php/akta/article/2547/1908
Regulation:
Constitution of 1945 Republic of Indonesia
Civil Code / BW (Burgerlijke wetboek)
Code of Civil law
Mortgage Laws 224 (HIR) and 258 (RBG) General Points Number 9
Mortgage Law Articles 14 and 26
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30659/sanlar.2.4.636-643
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Sultan Agung Notary Law Review has been indexed in: