Analysis of the Authority of Community Organizations in Conducting the Sealing and Confiscation of Assets

Soffyan Angga Fahlani, Eko Taufikur Rahman, Muhammad Azianor Ilmy

Abstract


The involvement of community organizations (ormas) in acts of sealing and confiscating assets reflects a shift in their role from social organizations to actors resembling law enforcement authorities. In practice, such actions often arise in land disputes, business conflicts, or pressure against certain parties under the justification of protecting public interests. However, under the Indonesian legal system, the authority to conduct sealing and confiscation is exclusively granted to law enforcement agencies and judicial institutions pursuant to statutory regulations. Consequently, actions undertaken by ormas potentially violate the principles of legality, due process of law, and the rule of law. This study employs a normative juridical research method using statutory and conceptual approaches. The legal materials consist of primary legal sources, including legislation, court decisions, and official documents, as well as secondary legal materials such as books, journals, and legal doctrines. The analysis was conducted through stages of editing, systematization, and description of relevant legal provisions. The findings demonstrate that ormas, as private entities, do not possess authority through attribution, delegation, or mandate to carry out coercive actions such as sealing and confiscation. Such conduct may therefore be classified as an abuse of authority in the form of arbitrary action without lawful authorization. From the perspective of criminal law, these acts may fulfill the elements of criminal offenses, including unlawful appropriation, extortion, or unauthorized control of property. From the standpoint of civil law, such actions may constitute unlawful acts (torts), giving injured parties the right to seek compensation for damages. Furthermore, within administrative law, actions exceeding the lawful functions of ormas may result in administrative sanctions, including warnings, suspension of activities, and revocation of legal entity status.


Keywords


Law

Full Text:

PDF

References


Journals:

Asmuni. (2024). Klasifikasi Penyalahgunaan Wewenang dalam Konteks Undang- Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2014 tentang Administrasi Pemerintah. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora Dan Politik, 4(6), 2071–2080.

Auliany, N., S, S. A., & Sumarja, F. (2025). Analisis Perbuatan Melawan Hukum Terhadap Tanah Sita Eksekusi. Indonesian Journal Of Law And Justice, 2(4), 1–9.

Benuf, K., & Azhar, M. (2020). Metodologi Penelitian Hukum sebagai Instrumen Mengurai Permasalahan Hukum Kontemporer. Gema Keadilan, 7(1), 20–33.

Christianto, H. (2017). Mekanisme Penegakan Hukum Perkara Pidana Pornografi Melalui Internet. Veritas et Justitia, 3(1), 117–137.

Christy, B. M. (2025). Penyitaan Barang Bukti Bergerak Perspektif Sosiologi Hukum (Studi Kasus di Kantor Rumah Penyimpanan Benda Sitaan Negara Kelas I Kupang). Jurnal Terapung : Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial, 7(1), 38–48.

Darmawati, A., Anzward, B., & Putra, K. (2020). Kepastian Hukum Pelaksanaan Sita Jaminan Oleh Pengadilan Negeri Balikpapan (Studi Analisis Perkara Nomor : 80/Pdt.G/2001/PN.Bpp). LEX SUPREMA Jurnal Ilmu hukum, 2(1).

Efendi, A., & Sudarsono. (2024). Tindakan Ultra Vires Organ Pemerintahan Dan Konsekuensi Hukumnya. Jurnal Masalah-Masalah Hukum, 53(2), 145–154.

Ghassani, N. F., Santoso, B., & Prabandari, A. P. (2021). Kewenangan Direktorat Jenderal Bea Dan Cukai Kantor Pengawasan Dan Pelayanan Bea Dan Cukai Tipe Madya Pabean Tanjung Emas Dalam Pelayanan Pengembalian Barang Tegahan. Notarius, 14(2), 916–929.

Pahlevi, R. R., Zaini, Z. D., & Hapsari, R. A. (2021). Analisis Perbuatan Melawan Hukum (Onrechtmatigedaad) Terhadap Sengketa Kepemilikan Hak Atas Tanah. Pagaruyuang Law Journal, 5(1), 18–28.

Pratini, S., Rokhim, A., & Syamsudin. (2022). Tindakan Kekerasan Oleh Massa Terhadap Orang Yang Tertangkap Tangan Saat Melakukan Tindak Pidana. Legalitas : Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Hukum, 7(2), 1–14.

Priyono, D. P., & Nilamsari, W. (2021). Penyalahgunaan Hak Dan Wewenang Organisasi Masyarakat Di Kelurahan Kedaung, Tangerang Selatan, Banten. Jurnal Ilmiah Dinamika Sosial, 5(2), 253–269.

Putra, M. A. A. (2021). Bentuk Penyalahgunaan Wewenang Pejabat Pemerintah Yang Tidak Dapat Dipidana. Justisi, 7(2), 118–136.

Putra, M. A. A. S., Sidarta, D. D., & Paramitha, V. N. (2026). Implikasi Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP) Baru dan Undang-Undang Ormas Terhadap Praktik Premanisme Mengatasnamakan Ormas. Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Digital Business (RIGGS), 5(1), 460–473.

Qamar, N., & Rezah, F. S. (2023). Wewenang Sebagai Instrumen Penyelenggararaan Pemerintahan Dalam Sistem Negara Hukum. Asas Wa Tandhim: Jurnal Hukum, Pendidikan Dan Sosial Keagamaan, 2(2), 201–222.

Sharon, G. (2020). Teori Wewenang Dalam Perizinan. Jurnal Justiciabelen, 3(1), 50–63.

Soleman, S. D., Irhamsyah, I., & Ridwan, R. (2025). Tanggung Jawab Atas Penyalahgunaan Keadaan Dalam Pembuatan Akta Perjanjian Pengikatan Jual Beli Yang Dibuat Oleh Notaris Atas Permintaan Para Pihak Dan Akibat Hukumnya. Journal of Innovation Research and Knowledge, 4(11), 8453–8462.

Tresnowaldi, Roza, D., & Helen, Z. (2024). Kewenangan Penindakan Yustisial Satuan Polisi Pamong Praja Kota Bukittinggi Dalam Penegakan Peraturan Daerah. Jurnal Sakato Ekasakti Law Review, 3(1), 1–9.

Zamroni, M. (2024). Konsep Kewenangan Dalam Perspektif Hukum Perdata. Mimbar Hukum, 36(2).

Books:

Bachtiar. (2021). Mendesain Penelitian Hukum. Deepublish.

Marzuki, P. M. (2025). Penelitian Hukum Edisi Revisi (20th ed.). Kencana.

Solikin, N. (2021). Pengantar Metodologi Penelitian Hukum. Qiara Media.

Zulkarnaen. (2017). Penyitaan dan eksekusi. Pustaka Setia.

Internet:

CNN Indonesia. (2025, February 13). Ormas Segel Kantor Anak Usaha Bumi Resources di Palu, Ini Alasannya. https://www.cnnindonesia.com/ekonomi/20250213100155-92-1197774/ormas-segel-kantor-anak-usaha-bumi-resources-di-palu-ini-alasannya

Lestari, A. P. (2025, May 2). Pabrik di Barito Selatan Disegel Ormas Grib, Kapolda Kalteng: Tindak Tegas! https://www.detik.com/kalimantan/hukum-dan-kriminal/d-7897006/pabrik-di-barito-selatan-disegel-ormas-grib-kapolda-kalteng-tindak-tegas

Lukihardianti, A. (2025, October 17). Aksi Banser Segel Transmart Buahbatu Bandung Protes Tayangan Xpose Unsencored | Republika Online. https://rejabar.republika.co.id/berita/t49ymp512/aksi-banser-segel-transmart-buahbatu-bandung-protes-tayangan-xpose-unsencored

Mulia, P. (2025, October 17). Penyegelan Transmart oleh Banser NU di Bojongsoang | tempo.co. https://www.tempo.co/foto/arsip/penyegelan-transmart-oleh-banser-nu-di-bojongsoang-2080499

Nurmansyah, D. Y. (2025, August 6). Alasan Penyegelan pada Saat Pemeriksaan Pajak - Ortax. https://ortax.org/alasan-penyegelan-pada-saat-pemeriksaan-pajak

Yanuar, Y. (2025, May 4). Kronologi GRIB Jaya Kalteng Segel Perusahaan di Barito Selatan | tempo.co. https://www.tempo.co/hukum/kronologi-grib-jaya-kalteng-segel-perusahaan-di-barito-selatan-1334405




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30659/jdh.v9i3.52807

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Jurnal Daulat Hukum has been indexed in:

sinta 

Editorial Office: RUMAH JURNAL FH UNISSULA (RJFHU) 2nd Floor, Faculty of Law Universitas Islam Sultan Agung. Jln. Kaligawe KM. 4, Semarang City, Central Java, Indonesia. 

Phone: +62 8214461245
Email: jdh@unissula.ac.id

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).