Analysis of the Legal Liability of Bankrupt Developers as a Form of Fulfilling Consumer Rights in Apartment Unit Sale and Purchase Disputes (Case Study of Decision No. 4716 K/Pdt/2023)

Kartika Pangestu, Moody Rizky Syailendra Putra

Abstract


The increasing demand for vertical housing amidst limited urban land has driven the rise of apartment developments with a pre-sale system, but this model often leads to default issues by developers. The case between PT Multi Karya Utama Abadi (MKUA) and Nina Herlina in the Bandung Technoplex Living (BTL) project shows that consumers have made full payments but have not received the handover of the unit, while the developer is experiencing financial difficulties, making it difficult to implement the legally binding decision. This study aims to analyze the judge's ratio decidendi in Decision Number 4716 K/Pdt/2023 based on Article 1239 of the Civil Code and examine the form of legal responsibility of developers through the Suspension of Debt Payment Obligations (PKPU) mechanism. The study uses normative legal methods with a statutory approach, a conceptual approach, and a case approach through an analysis of related decisions at the first, appeal, and cassation levels. The results show that the judge stated that the developer had broken his promise and was obliged to compensate for losses, but settlement could not be carried out partially because the default issue was related to the company's financial failure. Therefore, PKPU is a relevant mechanism to ensure the fulfillment of consumer rights through debt restructuring that involves all creditors proportionally, thus functioning as a dual instrument for business rescue and legal protection for consumers.


Keywords


Evidence; Persecution; Visum et Repertum.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Adi Nugroho, (2013). “Analisis Yuridis terhadap Keadaan Insolvensi dalam Kepailitan (Studi Normatif Pasal 2 Ayat 1) Undang-Undang No. 37 Tahun 2004 Tentang Kepailitan dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang”, Kementerian Pendidikan Nasional Fakultas Hukum Universitas Brawijaya, Malang, , hal. 5.

Catur Irianto, (2015). “Penerapan Asas Kelangsungan Usaha dalam Penyelesaian Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang (PKPU) The Application of the Principle of Business Continuity in Bankruptcy Settlement and Debt Payment Suspention)”, Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan, Vol. 4, No. 3: 413.

Fauzan Thariq Nurdianto, (2018). “Pembayaran Ganti Rugi oleh Debitur Kepada Kreditur Akibat Wanprestasi Dalam Perjanjian Berdasarkan Pasal 1236 KUHPerdata”, Lex Et Societatis, Vol. 6, No. 7: 63.

Gaol, Royana Lumban, dkk. (2021). “Penerapan Asas Kelangsungan Usaha Atas Debitur Pailit Dalam Perkara Kepailitan.” Jurnal Hukum 7 Special Issue: 106.

Izzul Islam, “Penjelasan Lengkap Pasal 1338 KUHPerdata”, https://www.tanyalawyer.com/penjelasan-lengkap-pasal-1338-kuh-perdata/, 2024 Maret.

Khairul Aswadi, (2018). “Ratio Decidendi Hakim Dalam Memutus Perkara Wanprestasi (Studi Kasus Putusan Nomor: 107/PDT.G/2017/PN.MTR)”, Jurnal Unizar Law Review, Vol. 1, No. 1: 94.

Kiki Setiawan and Partners, “Asas Fiduciary Duty Direksi dan Dewan Komisaris”, https://www.ksplaw.co.id/Publication/KSP-LEGAL-ALERT/asas-fiduciary-duty-direksi-dan-dewan-komisaris.html, accessed on December 2024 .

Krista Yitawati, et. al., (2022). Hukum Kepailitan dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang (PKPU), Yogyakarta: Deepublish.

Niru Anita Sinaga and Nurlely Darwis, (2015). “Wanprestasi dan Akibatnya dalam Pelaksanaan Perjanjian”, Jurnal Mitra Manajemen, Vol. 7, No. 2,

Pandam Nurwulan, (2015). “Aspek Hukum Transaksi Jual Beli Rumah Susun/Apartemen di Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta Kaitannya dengan Peran Notaris-PPAT”, Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM, Vol. 22, No. 4.

Raihan Rachman, (2023). “Penerapan Asas Keadilan dalam Sengketa Kepailitan dalam Rangka Melindungi Kepentingan Debitur (Studi Putusan: Nomor 44pk/Pdt.Sus-Pailit/2016)”, Jurnal Privat Law, Vol. 11, No. 2: 315.

Richard C. Adam, et. al., (2021). Anatomi Hukum Kepailitan dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang, Depok: Rajawali Pers.

Richard Eddy, (2010). Aspek Legal Properti: Teori, Contoh, dan Aplikasi, Yogyakarta: Penerbit Andi.

Rio Christiawan, (2020). Hukum Kepailitan dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang, Depok: PT. Rajagrafindo Persada,

Shidarta, “Ratio Decidendi dan Kaidah Yurisprudensi”, https://business-law.binus.ac.id/2019/03/04/ratio-decidendi-dan-kaidah-yurisprudensi/, accessed on March2019.

Siti Nur Azizah, (2023). Buku Ajar Hukum Perjanjian, Yogyakarta: Deepublish

Tony Marta, dkk., (2021). “Analisis Risiko Operasional dalam Proses Pembangunan Apartemen PTR. Graha Reyhan Tri Putra”, Vol. 2, No. 1.

Umar Haris Sanjaya, (2014). Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang dalam Hukum Kepailitan, Yogyakarta: NFP Publishing.




DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.30659/jdh.v8i4.49007

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


View My Stats

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.


Jurnal Daulat Hukum has been indexed in:

sinta google_scholar moraref garuda neliti Dimension Base