Legal Protection for Franchisors and Franchisees in Cases of Breach of Franchise Agreement

Daniel Daniel, Ariawan Gunadi

Abstract


This study aims to analyze the effectiveness of Indonesia’s positive law in providing legal certainty and justice for the parties in resolving franchise disputes arising from breach of contract. The research uses a normative juridical method with a statutory and conceptual approach. The findings indicate that Indonesia’s legal framework on franchising has been comprehensively regulated under Government Regulation No. 42 of 2007, Minister of Trade Regulation No. 71 of 2019, and the Civil Code provisions. Normatively, these regulations have provided a foundation of legal certainty and protection for both franchisors and franchisees. However, the effectiveness of implementation remains limited due to the lack of administrative compliance among business actors, weak government supervision, and the inequality of bargaining power in standard contracts. Therefore, it is necessary to strengthen state supervision, enhance legal awareness among business actors, and enforce principles of justice and good faith in the execution of franchise agreements, so that the law not only ensures formal certainty but also achieves substantive justice for both parties.


Keywords


Contract; Certainty; Effectiveness; Franchise; Justice.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Books:

Astutik, D. P. (2020). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Franchisee Yang Dirugikan Oleh Franchisor Dalam Perjanjian Waralaba. RechtIdee, 15(2).

Rahardjo, S. (1991). Ilmu hukum. Citra Aditya Bakti.

Raharjo, H. (2009). Hukum perjanjian di Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Yustisia.

Winarta, F. H. (2022). Hukum Penyelesaian Sengketa Arbitrase Nasional Indonesia dan Internasional: Edisi Kedua. Sinar Grafika.

Journals:

Ardiyanto, R. (2023). Perlindungan hukum terhadap hak kekayaan intelektual dalam perjanjian waralaba. Jurnal Hukum Bisnis Indonesia, 9(2).

Awaluddin, M. V. (2013). Aspek yuridis perjanjian waralaba sebagai perjanjian khusus. Jurnal Hukum dan Bisnis, 1(1).

Dalimunthe, D. (2017). Akibat hukum wanprestasi dalam perspektif Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata (BW). AL-MAQASID: Jurnal Ilmu Kesyariahan dan Keperdataan, 3(1), 12–29.

Dharmawan, J. (2023). Urbanisasi dan keadilan dalam konteks multidisiplin. QISTINA: Jurnal Multidisiplin Indonesia, 2(2).

Farida, I. (2021). Klausul-Klausul Dalam Perjanjian Franchise Terhadap Pihak Yang Berat Sebelah. Law, Development and Justice Review, 4(2), 218–233.

Harnoko, Y. (2015). Asas proporsional dalam perjanjian waralaba (franchise). Jurnal Bisnis dan Hukum, 1(1).

Inggriani, T. (2023). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Para Pihak Dalam Perjanjian Waralaba Di Indonesia. Universitas Jambi.

Juajir, S. (1995). Aspek-aspek hukum franchise dan perusahaan transnasional. Bandung: PT Citra Aditya Bakti.

Ningrum, T. A. L., & Inayah, S. H. (2021). Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Penerima Waralaba (Frenchisee) Terhadap Pewaralaba (Franchisor) yang Tidak Memiliki Surat Tanda Pendaftaran Waralaba (STPW). Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta.

Perwira, B. I. D. (2018). Perlindungan hukum terhadap penerima waralaba dalam perjanjian waralaba (Skripsi, Universitas Mataram).

Pamolango, J. T. (2017). Tinjauan yuridis terhadap kewenangan arbitrase dalam penyelesaian sengketa (Skripsi, Universitas Sam Ratulangi).

Rahayu, I. (2024). Alternatif penyelesaian sengketa bisnis dalam perjanjian waralaba di Indonesia. Lex Lata, 5(1).

Rahmad, A., & Zubaedah, R. (2022). Tinjauan Perspektif Hukum Perdata Terhadap Perjanjian Waralaba Di Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Dan Humaniora, 9(1), 20.

Situmorang, M. (2020). Pembatalan Putusan Arbitrase. Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure, 20(4), 573.

Warta, I. M. (2020). Wanprestasi dalam perjanjian jual beli kain tenun songket di Desa Sidemen. Parta: Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat, 1(1).

Regulation:

Law No. 30 of 1999 concerning Arbitration and Alternative Dispute Resolution. Jakarta: State Secretariat.

Law No. 30 of 2000 concerning Trade Secrets. Jakarta: State Secretariat.

Law No. 20 of 2016 concerning Trademarks and Geographical Indications. Jakarta: State Secretariat.

Minister of Trade Regulation Number 71 of 2019 concerning Franchise Implementation. Jakarta: Ministry of Trade.

Government Regulation Number 42 of 2007 concerning Franchise Businesses. State Secretariat.




DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.30659/jdh.v8i4.48994

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


View My Stats

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.


Jurnal Daulat Hukum has been indexed in:

sinta google_scholar moraref garuda neliti Dimension Base