Judge's Rejection of Compensation for the Management of Dowry Disputes (Analysis of Decision Number 262/Pdt.G/2022/Pa.Batg)
Abstract
This study raises the case of a judge's rejection of a claim for compensation for the management of a dowry dispute at the Bantaeng Religious Court. The case involved a couple who separated after the husband took back the land that had previously been used as dowry. Although the judge decided to return the land to the wife, the judge rejected the wife's claim for compensation for the management of the land. In this context, the rule of Al'adatu Muhakkamah is one of the principles used in determining the law when there is no shar'i evidence that explicitly explains it. This study aims to analyze the judge's decision to refuse compensation for the results of the management of the dowry dispute and analyze the use of the Al'adatul Muhakkamah rule in the decision. The research method used is normative legal research method with a qualitative approach. The qualitative approach was chosen to describe the research results with sentences that categorize the data according to certain categories. With this approach, the research can provide in-depth conclusions about the application of the Al'adatu Muhakkamah rule in the judge's decision. The research findings show that the judge should have granted the compensation claim based on the analysis of the al-'adatul muhakkamah rule. Islamic law aims to realize human welfare, including by recognizing that customs that are still valid for generations have a significant influence in determining legal decisions. However, the main principle of sharia must still be the top priority, especially if there is a conflict between custom and Islamic Law.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Journals:
Abdul Rahman Qayyum, & Rini Ekasari. (2020). Pemahaman Masyarakat terhadap Kedudukan Sunrang di Kecamatan Pallangga Kab. Gowa; Studi Perbandingan Hukum Adat dan Hukum Islam. DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals), 2(1). https://doi.org/10.24252/mh.v2i1.14294
Adlini, M. N., Dinda, A. H., Yulinda, S., Chotimah, O., & Merliyana, S. J. (2022). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif Studi Pustaka. Edumaspul: Jurnal Pendidikan, 6(1), 974–980. https://doi.org/10.33487/edumaspul.v6i1.3394
Ambarita, M. (2021). Kekuatan Pembuktian Pemeriksaan Setempat (Gerechtelijke Plaatsopneming) Dalam Pemeriksaan Sengketa Perdata. Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia, 18(3), p 390.
Appe, R. M. (2021). Perlindungan Hukum Hak-Hak Isteri Atas Tanah Sebagai Mahar Dalam Perkawinan. Indonesia Journal of Criminal Law, 3(1), p 66.
Azhar, F., Rahman, S., & Khalid, H. (2021). Analisis Hukum Tentang Kekuatan Pembuktian Pada Perkara Perdata. Qawanin Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 1(1), p 83.
Fitriyani, F. (2022). Multicomplex Uang Panai’ terhadap Perempuan dalam Perkawinan Keluarga Muslim Suku Bugis. Tasyri’: Journal of Islamic Law, 1(2), 195–214. https://doi.org/10.53038/tsyr.v1i2.37
Kafi, Abd. (2020). MAHAR PERNIKAHAN DALAM PANDANGAN HUKUM DAN PENDIDIKAN ISLAM. PARAMUROBI: JURNAL PENDIDIKAN AGAMA ISLAM, 3(1), 55–62. https://doi.org/10.32699/paramurobi.v3i1.1436
Kandou, R. M. F., Mamesah, E. L., & Sepang, R. (2023). PELAKSANAAN PEMERIKSAAN SETEMPAT SEBAGAI BAHAN PERTIMBANGAN HAKIM DALAM MEMUTUS PERKARA PERDATA. LEX ADMINISTRATUM, 11(5). https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/v3/index.php/administratum/article/view/50929
Mahfudhi, H., & Arrosid, M. K. (2021). TEORI ADAT DALAM QOWAID FIQHIYAH DAN PENERAPANYA DALAM HUKUM KELUARGA ISLAM. Familia: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga, 2(2), 119–136. https://doi.org/10.24239/familia.v2i2.28
Nurlia, N., & Nurasiah, N. (2017). SUNRANG TANAH SEBAGAI MAHAR UNTUK MENINGKATKAN IDENTITAS DIRI PEREMPUAN DALAM PERKAWINAN BUGIS MAKASSAR. Jurnal Dakwah Tabligh, 18(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.24252/jdt.v18i1.2861
Reski Ulul Amri. (2020). Kududukan Doi Menre dalam Perkawinan Suku Bugis di Bone Sulawesi Selatan. Asy-Syir Ah Jurnal Ilmu Syari Ah Dan Hukum, 54(1), 83–83. https://doi.org/10.14421/ajish.v54i1.544
SH., MH, M. (2017). Putusan Verstek dalam Hukum Acara Perdata. JURNAL MERCATORIA, 10(2), 160. https://doi.org/10.31289/mercatoria.v10i2.1153
Sundari, E., & Widiastiani, N. S. (2019). PERKEMBANGAN PEMBUKTIAN PADA PUTUSAN VERSTEK: STUDI KASUS DI PENGADILAN NEGERI SLEMAN DAN KOTA YOGYAKARTA. Justitia et Pax, 35(2). https://doi.org/10.24002/jep.v35i2.2936
Suparmin, S. (2021). Al-Mashlahah: Jurnal Hukum Islam dan Pranata Sosial Islam. Al-Adatu Al-Muhakkamah in the Traditional Menukur of Culture, 9(2). https://doi.org/doi.org/10.30868/am.v9i02.3212.
Surya Putra, F. (2021). Urgensi dan Kedudukan Shodaq (Mahar) dalam Pernikahan. Jurnal An-Nahl, 8(2), 78–90. https://doi.org/10.54576/annahl.v8i2.33
Yusandy, T. (2019). Kedudukan dan Kekuatan Pembuktian Alat Bukti Elektronik dalam Hukum Acara Perdata Indonesia. Jurnal Serambi Akademica, 7(5), 645. https://doi.org/10.32672/jsa.v7i5.1522
Books:
Askin, Moh., & Masidin. (2023). Penelitian Hukum Normatif: Analisis Putusan Hakim (p. p 141). Kencana.
Azhari, F. (2015). Qawaid Fiqhiyyah Muamalah. In Banjarmasin: Lembaga Pemberdayaan Kualitas Ummat). (p. p 118.).
Efendi, J., & Rijadi, P. (2022). Metode Penelitian Hukum Normatif dan Empiris (p. p 124). Kencana.
Ibrahim, D. (2019). AL-QAWA`ID AL-FIQHIYAH (KAIDAH-KAIDAH FIQIH). Noer Fikih.
Kaharuddin. (2015). Nilai-Nilai Filosofi Perkawinan (p. p 201). Mitra Wacana Media.
Nasution, I. (2023). Pedoman Lengkap Fikih Munakahat (p. p 101). Prenada Media Group.
Rohim, M. (2019). Buku Ajar Qawa’id Fiqhiyyah (Inspirasi Dan Dasar Penetapan Hukum), ed. oleh Ahmad Ali Mashudi (p. p 118). LPPM UNHASY Tebuireng Jombang.
v, M. T., Marwing, A., & Syamsudin. (2020). Realitas ‘Urf Dalam Reaktualisasi Pembaruan Hukum Islam Di Indonesia (p. p 18). Duta Media Publishing.
Zaenal Arifin, M. (2012). Fiqh Perempuan (p. p 83). Zaman.
Internet:
Arasy Pradana A. Azis. (2019). Kedudukan Keputusan Pengadilan Adat. Hukumonline.com. https://www.hukumonline.com/klinik/a/kedudukan-keputusan-pengadilan-adat-lt5d2bf896f3ec3
Direktorat Jenderal Kekayaan Negara. (2021). Pemeriksaan Setempat (descente) Dalam Hukum Pembuktian Perkara Perdata. Kemenkeu.go.id. https://www.djkn.kemenkeu.go.id/artikel/baca/14309/Pemeriksaan-Setempat-descente-Dalam-Hukum-Pembuktian-Perkara-Perdata.html.
Editorial. (2022, March 3). Pasal 175 RBg (Recht Reglement voor de Buitengewesten). https://cekhukum.com/pasal-175-rbg-recht-reglement-voor-de-buitengewesten
Online, H. (n.d.). Undang-Undang Nomor 3 Tahun 2006 - Pusat Data Hukumonline. Hukumonline.com. Retrieved July 6, 2024, from https://www.hukumonline.com/pusatdata/detail/25602/uu-no-3-tahun-2006-perubahan-atas-undang-undang-nomor-7-tahun-1989-tentang-peradilan-agama.
Others:
Karman. (2022). Sunrang Dalam Perkawinan Adat Masyarakat Bungayya Desa Pa’jukukang Kecamatan Pa’jukukang Kabupaten Bantaeng (p. p 14) [Skripsi].
Kementerian Agama Republik Indonesia. (2018). Kompilasi Hukum Islam Di Indonesia (p.p 17). Direktorat Bina KUA dan Keluarga Sakinah.
Marwing, A. (2020). REALITAS €˜URF DALAM REAKTUALISASI PEMBARUAN HUKUM ISLAM DI INDONESIA. In repository.iainpalopo.ac.id. Duta Media Publishing. http://repository.iainpalopo.ac.id/id/eprint/1846/
Said, N. (2002). Tanah Sebagai Mahar dalam Perkawinan Studi Kasus Perempuan Suku Bugis-Makassar di Sulawesi Selatan yang Menerima Tanah Pada Waktu Menikah [Tesis]. https://lib.ui.ac.id/detail?id=73370&lokasi=lokal.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30659/jdh.v7i2.38773
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
View My Stats
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Jurnal Daulat Hukum has been indexed in:
