Diversion Method by Investigators in Resolving Cases of Children in Conflict with the Law

Afifat Agung Dwi Cahyono

Abstract


The purpose of this study is to study and analyze the function of investigator diversion in resolving cases of children in conflict with the law. In this writing, the author uses a juridical normative method with a research specification in the form of descriptive analysis. One of the efforts to protect children in conflict with the law is through Law Number 11 of 2012 concerning the Juvenile Criminal Justice System. The existence of the Law on the Criminal Justice System in its implementation contains a requirement to uphold justice for children in conflict with the law, namely by implementing restorative justice as one of the methods of resolving child cases in Indonesia. The purpose of such juvenile justice is operationally played by law enforcement officers, in this context, law enforcement officers as regulated in Law No. 2 of 2002 concerning the Republic of Indonesia National Police are given the widest possible freedom and in all examination enhancements to exercise discretion. The implementation of diversion is motivated by the desire to avoid negative effects on the child's soul and development by their involvement with the criminal justice system. The implementation of diversion by law enforcement officers is based on the authority of law enforcement officers called discretion; is the authority of law enforcement officers who handle criminal cases.

Keywords


Diversion, Investigators, Children

References


Books

Harry E. Allen and Clifford E. SimmonsendalamPurniati, Mamik, Sri Supatmi, dan Ni Made Martini Tinduk, (2003), Correction in America An Introduction, Analisa SituasiSistemPeradilanPidana Anak (Juvenile Justice System) di Indonesia, Jakarta, UNICEF

M. Ghufran H. Kodri, (2010), Hak dan Perlindungan Anak Kertas, PT Perca, Jakarta

M Nasir Djamil, (2013), Anak BukanUntukDihukum, SinarGrafik, Jakarta Timur

Yahya Harapan, (2006), PembahasanPermasalahan dan Penerapan KUHAP, Penyidikan dan Penuntuan, SinarGrafika, Jakarta

Journals

Ani Purwati dan AriefSyahrulAlam, (2015), DiversiSebagaiWujudKebijakanPemidanaandalamSistemPeradilanPidana Anak di Indonesia, De Jure Jurnal Syariah dan Hukum, 7 (2), Desember

Badan Penelitian dan Pengembangan HAM Kementerian Hukum dan HAM, (2013), Penerapan Restorative Justice dalamPenyelesaianTindakPidana yang Dilakukan oleh Anak-anak. Jakarta

BPHN, (2007), Draft Akademis RUU Peradilan Anak, BPHN, Jakarta

Herman Balla. (2022), Diversi: Anak yang BerhadapanDengan Hukum, JULIA: JurnalLitigasiAmsir, 9 (3), Mei

HwianChristianto. (2011), Tafsir Konstitusionalitasterhadap Batas UsiaPemidanaan Anak, JurnalKonstitusi, 8 (5), Oktober

M Bachrudin Mufti, and Ali Muhammad. (2022). Peran PembimbingKemasyarakatanDalamPenerapan Restorative Justice Pada Penanganan Anak Berhadapandengan Hukum di Lapas Kelas I Surabaya, Jurnal Pendidikan dan Konseling, 4 (6)

Poppy Novita Ayu, HeruSusetyo. (2015), Peran PenyidikdalamPenerapanDiversi dan DiskresiTerhadap Anak yang Berhadapandengan Hukum. Lex Jurnalica, 12 (1), April

Siti AnizaRahmah, dkk. (2021), PenerapanDiversi Oleh PenyidikdalamTindakPidana Anak di Polres Metro Jakarta Selatan, Journal of Legal Reserch, 3 (1)

Tomalili, Rahmanuddin dan AgusAriadi, (2022), PenerapanDiversiMelaluiPendekatanKeadilanRestoratif (Restorative Justice) yang Dilakukan Oleh Hakim Anak Di Pengadilan Negeri Unaaha, Sibatik Journal, 1 (5), April




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30659/rlj.3.4.46-60

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Ratio Legis Journal has been indexed in: