Criminal Law Enforcement Against Drug Dealers as Drug Abusers in Progressive Law
Abstract
Law enforcement aims to create justice, certainty and benefits, in relation to drug abuse, law is one alternative solution to eradicate drug abuse, because the law contains a number of rules and provisions to ensure that the norms in the law are obeyed by the community. Drug abusers more often end up in prison than given the right to rehabilitation. The dimensions of health and recovery, both physical and psychological, through rehabilitation are less considered and tend to be sidelined. The imposition of punishment for users should be more oriented towards the aspect of rehabilitation punishment rather than imprisonment, because this is to emphasize and clarify the punishment between drug dealers and abusers. The approach method used is normative juridical, namely a legal literature study conducted by examining library materials or secondary data alone using deductive thinking methods. The writing specifications use descriptive analysis, the sources and types of data used are secondary data. The data collection method is by collecting data using secondary data collection methods. The problem is analyzed using the theory of law enforcement and the theory of legal effectiveness. For drug addicts or dealers as a substitute for imprisonment sanctions adopted from the double track system model, which is a two-track system regarding sanctions in criminal penalties, namely the type of criminal sanctions and the type of action sanctions. The guarantee of legal protection provided for drug addicts is regulated through Law No. 35 of 2009 concerning Narcotics by providing rehabilitation, both medical and social rehabilitation as stated in Article 54 of the narcotics law, namely that "drug addicts and drug abusers are required to undergo medical rehabilitation and social rehabilitation. The effectiveness of law enforcement against dealers as perpetrators of drug abuse is still inconsistent with the government's implementation of the Law. So this provides a legal problem in dealing with this problem, in this case there needs to be a reconvention in the Law that can be implemented according to the circumstances that occur and does not change it at any time making this less effective
Keywords
References
Books:
Esmi Warasih, 2005, Pranata Hukum Sebuah Telaah Sosiologis, Semarang, PT.Suryandaru Utama.
Hawari, D. 2002. Penyalahgunaan & Ketergantungan NAZA, Jakarta: FKUI.
Lydia Harlina Martono & Satya Joewana, 2006, Membantu Pemulihan Pecandu Narkoba dan Keluarganya, Jakarta, Balai Pustaka.
Mahmud Mulyadi, 2011, Politik Hukum Pidana, Fakultas Hukum Universitas Sumatera Utara, Sumatera Utara.
Mustafa, Muhammad, 2007, Krimonologi: Kajian Sosiologi terhadap Kriminalitas, Perilaku menyimpang, dan Pelanggar Hukum, FISIP UI Press.
Satjipto Rahardjo, 2002, Masalah Penegakan Hukum Suatu Tinjauan Sosiologis, Sinar Baru, Bandung.
Journals:
ApriliantinPutriPamungkas,2017 “Peran ASEANAPOL dalam Pemberantasan Peredaran Narkoba di Indonesia”, Journal of International Relations, Volume 3, Nomor 2.
Janpatar Simamora, 2014, Tafsir Makna Negara Hukum Dalam Perspektif Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945, Jurnal Dinamika Hukum, Vol. 14 No. 3.
Asmin Fransiska, “Kesewenang-wenangan Penegak Hukum dan Stagnannya Refo rmas Kebijakan Napza di Indonesia Pelajaran dari Kasus Sidiq Yudhi Arianto”, Jurnal Kajian Putusan Pengadilan Dictum, Edisi 1 Oktober 2012, ISSN: 1412 – 7059).
M Syamsudin, “Keadilan Prosedural Dan Substantif, Procedural And Substantive Justice” 7, No. 48 (2014)
Moises Na’im, The Fourth Annual Grotius Lecture: Five Wars of Globalization, American University of International Law Review, Volume 18, 2002
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30659/rlj.3.4.1-16
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Ratio Legis Journal has been indexed in: