Analysis of Merging Civil Lawsuits into Criminal Cases in Compensation for Victims in Fraud and Money Laundering Cases (Study of Decision Number: 196/Pid.Sus/2021/PN Jkt.Utr)
Abstract
In an effort to realize the principle of the rule of law above in the life of society and the state, the rights of the community really need to be considered. We can see this in the development of criminal cases and compensation claims (which are civil in nature) in one criminal trial. This study aims to examine and analyze the implementation of merging civil lawsuits into criminal cases in compensation for victims. as well as examining and analyzing the inhibiting factors and their solutions in the implementation of merging civil lawsuits into criminal cases in compensation for victims. In the research conducted, the writing uses an empirical Juridical approach. The results of this study are the implementation of the merger of civil lawsuits into criminal cases in compensation for victims, such as in the case of defendant D.W., showing the importance of integration between criminal law enforcement and protection of victim rights. Although the provisions in Article 98 of the Criminal Procedure Code provide a legal basis for the merger of lawsuits, weaknesses in implementation, such as the absence of clarity regarding the confiscation and allocation of defendant assets for recovery of losses, create obstacles for victims to obtain compensation. This creates legal uncertainty and injustice for victims, who are at risk of not receiving proper compensation even though the defendant has been found guilty. (2) Inhibiting factors: existing legal substance obstacles do not provide clarity and clarity regarding the mechanism for confiscation and management of assets for victim compensation, creating legal uncertainty; legal structure obstacles, weak coordination between law enforcement officers, prosecutors, and courts complicate the management of evidence, so that assets that should be used for victims are often neglected; legal culture obstacles that focus more on punishing perpetrators without giving adequate attention to the restoration of victim rights hinder the application of the principle of substantive justice. To overcome these obstacles, regulatory reform, the establishment of a special unit for managing criminal assets, and increasing the capacity of law enforcement to create a fairer and more effective justice system are needed.
Keywords
References
Bambang Sunggono, 2010, Metodologi Penelitian Hukum, Rajawali Pers, Jakarta,
Fauzy Marasabessy, Restitusi Bagi Korban Tindak Pidana: Sebuah Tawaran Mekanisme Baru, Jurnal Hukum dan Pembangunan, Vol. 45, No. 1, 2023,
Husni, Anang. 2003. Fumgsi Hukum Dalam Penegakan Hak Masyarakat. Universitas Indonesia.
Ismansyah. 2000. Pidana Ganti Rugi Sebagai Perwujudan Perlindungan Korban Tindak Pidana (Suatu Kajian Pembaharuan Hukum Pidana), Makalah Hukum, Fakultas Hukum UNAND.
Jimly Asshiddiqie (et al.) Membangun Konstitusionalitas Indonesia. Jurnal Konstitusi 3(4), 2006,
Laurensius Arliman, Mewujudkan Penegakan Hukum Yang Baik Untuk Mewujudkan Indonesia Sebagai Negara Hukum, Jurnal Al Qadau, Vol 8 No 1, 2021,
Leden Marpaung, 2007, Proses Tuntutan Ganti Kerugian Dan Rehabilitasi Dalam Hukum Pidana. PT. Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta
M. Karyadi dan R. Soesilo, 1983. Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Pidana dengan Penjelasan dan Komentar, Politiea, Bogor,
M.A. Moegni Djojodirdjo. 1979, Perbuatan Melawan Hukum Cetakan Pertama, Pradnya Paramita.
Riskyanti Juniver Siburian, Pembaharuan Mekanisme Dalam Upaya Ganti Kerugian Korban Tindak Pidana. Indonesia Criminal Law Review, Vol. 1, No. 2. 2022,
Samekto, FX. Adji. Normativas Keilmuan Hukum Dalam Perspektif Aliran Pemikiran Neo-Kantian. Masalah-Masalah Hukum 44(1). 2015
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30659/rlj.3.4.931-940
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Ratio Legis Journal has been indexed in: