Criminal Responsibility Towards Children As Perpetrators Of The Criminal Act Of Interception
Abstract
This writing aims to determine and analyze the legal construction of criminal responsibility for children as perpetrators of the crime of sexual intercourse
and to determine and analyze the basis for the judge's legal considerations in imposing criminal sanctions on children as perpetrators of the crime of sexual intercourse
at the Madiun District Court. This study uses the Juridical Sociological method. To obtain data, this study uses primary data obtained from field studies with data collection techniques through observation and interviews at the Madiun District Court and secondary data obtained from literature studies. The results of the study indicate that the relevant law to the crime of sexual intercourse with a child is Article 81 paragraph (2) of Law Number 35 of 2014 concerning Amendments to Law Number 23 of 2002 concerning Child Protection as amended by Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 17 of 2016 concerning the Stipulation of Government Regulation in Lieu of Law Number 1 of 2016 concerning the Second Amendment to Law Number 23 of 2002 concerning Child Protection to become Law in conjunction with Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 11 of 2012 concerning the Juvenile Criminal Justice System. The criminal sanctions imposed on the child perpetrators indirectly are the two main criminal sanctions as regulated in Article 71 paragraph 1 of the Law on the Juvenile Criminal Justice System. The basis for the Judge's legal considerations in making a decision are legal considerations, namely considerations based on facts revealed in the trial and non-legal considerations contained in mitigating and aggravating factors. It is recommended that judges in examining children who commit crimes must be more careful and more observant so that in giving sanctions to children who do not commit crimes in accordance with the actions they have committed and that the government immediately form Government Regulations and encourage the Special Child Development Institution (LPKA), Social Welfare Institution (LPKS), Special Child Service Room (RPKA) and Temporary Child Placement Institution (LPAS).
Keywords
References
Books
Mudzakkir, Selayang Pandang item Hukum Indonesia Menurut H. Moh. Koesnoe, Universitas
Indonesia, Jakarta, 1997, hlm. 19
Sri Endah Wahyuningsih, 2013, Prinsip-Prinsip Individualisasi Pidana Dalam Hukum Pidana
Islam, Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang, hlm 1
Dwiyana Achmad Hartanto, Kontribusi Hukum Islam Dalam Pembaharuan Hukum Pidana Di Indonesia(studi
pidana cambuk di naggroe aceh darussalam), 2016, vol. 1, nomor 2, hlm 190
Journal
Dwiyana Achmad Hartanto, Kontribusi Hukum Islam Dalam Pembaharuan Hukum Pidana Di
Indonesia(studi pidana cambuk di naggroe aceh darussalam), 2016, vol. 1, nomor 2, hlm 190
Legislation
QS An Nuur Ayat 2
QS Al Isra’ Ayat 32
HR. Muslim
HR. Bukhari
Fiqih Jinayah
Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia
Undang-Undang Dasar 1945
Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana
Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Pidana
RUU KUHP
Internet
https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/a/melihat-pengaturan-perzinaan--kohabitasi--danperkosaan-dalam-kuhp-baru-lt647fe9d311227/ diakses pada tanggal 28 Mei 2024 pukul
40
https://www.hukumonline.com/klinik/a/bunyi-pasal-284-kuhp-tentang-perzinaanlt65a525183776f/ diakses pada tanggal 1 juni 2024 pukul 13.0
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30659/rlj.3.4.581-590
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Ratio Legis Journal has been indexed in: