Conventional gingivectomy for chronic gingival enlargement in orthodontic treatment: a case report

Irma Dewi Ratnawati, Rosa Pratiwi

Abstract


Background: Gingival enlargement, also known as gingival overgrowth, is an enlargement of the gum tissue. There are many possible causes for enlarged gums. Gingival enlargement is general feature of gingival diseases. It is common note to chronic inflammatory gingival enlargement was caused by poor of oral hygiene. Orthodontic braces can interfere with good oral hygiene, contributing to the development of the inflammatory process. One of the most common soft tissue problems related to fixed orthodontic appliances is gingival hypertrophy or hyperplasia. Maintaining oral hygiene is hindered in cases of gingival hypertrophy due to orthodontic appliances. The most widely used surgical method to treat gingival hypertrophy is gingivectomy.
Case Report : A 27-year-old patient was referred to the periodontal clinic of Airlangga University Dental Hospital because of primary gingival swelling with gingival bleeding during brushing in the anterior mandibular region. On intra oral examination showed excessive gingival with probing depth was range 4 mm on teeth 42-32, revealing the presence of pseudopockets. Clinical examination revealed generalized gingival enlargement as well as generalized bleeding on examination. After explaining the condition and treatment to the patient, he was registered for phase I treatment. After evaluating phase I therapies, phase II treatment with gingivectomy and gingivoplasty were required using a scalpel.
Conclusion: Conventional gingivectomy gives satisfactory result in treating the inflammatory gingival enlargement.

Keywords


Chronic inflammation, Gingival Enlargement, Gingivectomy, Orthodontic therapy

Full Text:

PDF

References


Jadhav T, Bhat KM, Bhat GS, Varghese JM. Chronic Inflammatory Gingival Enlargement Associated with Orthodontic Therapy – A Case Report . The Journal of Dental Hygiene. February 2013; 87(1): 19-23

Devaraj CG, Yadav A, Sharma S, Meena M, Goyal K. Diagnosis and Management of Chronic Gingival Overgrowth. Journal of Mahatma Gandhi University of Medical Sciences and Technology. Januari-April2017;2(1):47-50

Inchara N, Priya LG, Comparison of Healing Following Gingivectomy Procedures Using Diode Laserand Erbium, Chromium-Doped Yttrium, Scandium, Gallium and Garnet (Er:Cr:Ysgg) Laser – In Patients Undergoing Fixed Orthodontic Treatment- A Randomized Control Clinical Trial. Int J Orthod Rehabil 2022; 13:1:16-22

Cardoso M, Saraiva PP, Maltagliati LA, Rhoden FK, Costa CCA, Normando D, Filho LC. Alterations in Plaque Accumulation and Gingival Inflammation Promoted by Treatment with Self-ligating and Conventional Orthodontic Brackets. Dental Press J Orthod. 2015. Mar-Apr;20(2): 35-41.

Prabhu M, Ramesh A, Thomas B. Treatment of Orthodontically Induced Gingival Hyperplasia by Diode Laser – Case Report. NUJHS Vol.5, No.2, June 2015: 66-68.

Newman MG, Takei HH, Klokkevold PR, et al. Carranza’s Clinical Periodontology 13th ed.2018. St. Louis: Elsevier.

Tjiptoningsih UG. Enlargement gingival treatment on teeth 11 and 21. Journal of Dentomaxillofacial Science. 2016;1(3): 196-200.

Shankar BS, Ramadevi T, Neetha M S, Reddy P S K, Saritha G, Reddy J M. Chronic Inflammatory Gingival Overgrowths: Laser Gingivectomy & Gingivoplasty. J Int Oral Health 2013; 5(1):83-87.

Thakur AM, Baburaj MD. Chronic Inflammatory Gingival Enlargement: A Case Report. Int J Sci Stud 2018;5(11):172-174.

Trisantoso RA, Sri O, Surijana M. Comparasion of wound healing after using low level laser therapy and scalpel technique only on gingivectomy: a systematic review. Makassar Dent J. 2019;8(1):38-42.

Tomar N, Jain G, Sharma A, Wadhawan A. Inflammatory Gingival Enlargement – A Case Report. International Journal of Oral Health Dentistry, July – September, 2015;1(3):146-148.

Rao DS, Rao KVP, Tangudu A, Tanuja P, Kumar AK. Gingival Overgrowth during Orthodontic Therapy an d Its Management : A Case Report. Annals and essences of Dentistry. Vol. V Issue 4 Oct – Dec 2013: 9-11.

Akram H. M, Ali O. H, Omran N. K, Ali A. O. Diode Laser Versus Scalpel Gingivectomy. Biomed Pharmacol J 2017;10(4).

Manivannan N, Ahathya RS, Rajaram PC. Scalpel versus Electrosurgery : Comparison of Gingival perfusion Status using Ultrasound Dopple Flowmetry.J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2013 Jul;5(Suppl 2): S154-S159.

Roberta L, Chiara P, Andrea N, Marco C, Carlotta D and Paola C. Conventional versus laser gingivectomy in the management of gingival enlargement during orthodontic treatment: a randomized controlled trial. Eur J Orthod. 2020 Jan 27; 42(1): 78-85.

Meenawat A, Verma SC, Govila V, Srivastava V, Punn K. Histological and clinical evaluation of gingival healing following gingivectomy using different treatment modalities. JICDRO. 2017. 5(1): 31-35

Sagar G, Rajesh N, Kumar T, Reddy KK, Shankar B S, Sandeep V. Comparative evaluation of two surgical techniques using conventional scalpel method and diode laser for treatment outcome of depigmentation: 6 months follow-up study. J Dent Lasers [serial online]. 2016. 10: 2-9

Tanti E, Happy H, Dania K. Effectiveness of Robusta Coffee Bean Extract Gel on Collagen Fibers Density in Post Gingivectomy Wound Healing. Odonto Dental Journal. 2021 July; 8(1): 45-52.

Bhatsange A, Mehetre V, Meshram E, Shende A, Shiggaon LW. A Clinical And Histological Comparison Of Mucosal Incisions Produced By Scalpel, Electrocautery, And Diode Laser: A Pilot Sudy. Journal Of Dental Lasers. 2016; 10(2):37-42.

Ize-Iyamu, I.N., Saheeb, B.D. and Edetanlen, B.E. Comparing the 810 nm diode laser with conventional surgery in orthodontic soft tissue procedures. Ghana Medical Journal. 2013 Sep; 47(3): 107–111.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30659/odj.10.0.69-75

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Lisensi Creative Commons
This work is licensed under a Lisensi Creative Commons Atribusi-BerbagiSerupa 4.0 Internasional.
Contact us: Odonto Dental Journal: Jl. Raya Kaligawe Km.4, PO BOX 1054/SM Semarang, Central Java, Indonesia, 50112. Email: odontodentaljournal@unissula.ac.id