PROPERTIES OF COMPOSITE RESIN ALKASIT AND ZIRCONIA-REINFORCED GLASS-IONOMER CEMENT IN DIFFERENT STORAGE

Clarinda Vinindya  -  Universitas Indonesia, Indonesia
Cynthia Pratiwi  -  Universitas Indonesia
Yosi Kusuma Eriwati*  -  Universitas Indonesia, Indonesia
Siti Triaminingsih  -  Universitas Indonesia, Indonesia
Decky J Indrani  -  Universitas Indonesia

(*) Corresponding Author

Background: The temperature and salivary pH in a person's mouth are highly dynamic (e.g., before, during, and after eating) and so restorations in a cavity must be resilient to these variable conditions. Temperature and immersion conditions affect the mechanical properties of a restoration. This study aimed to determine the effect of environmental conditions on diametral tensile strength (DTS) and surface microhardness of a resin composite with alkaline fillers or zirconia–reinforced glass ionomer cement (Zr-reinforced GIC).
Method: Thirty specimens of a resin composite with alkaline fillers (Cention-N, Ivoclar-Vivadent, Lichtenstein) and 30 specimens with zirconia-reinforced GIC (Zirconomer, Shofu, Japan) were stored at different conditions (23°C and 37°C; with and without immersion in water) for 24 hours. DTS was tested with a Universal Testing Machine (AGS-X series, Shimadzu, Japan) and surface microhardness was tested with a Vickers Microhardness tester (HMV-G Series Micro Vickers Microhardness Tester, Shimadzu, Japan). Data were analyzed statistically using a one-way ANOVA test (and Shapiro-Wilk test.
Result: The values of microhardness and DTS increased significantly both for the composite resin alkasite and zirconia-reinforced GIC with increasing temperature in the groups without immersion. However, there was a significant decrease in microhardness and DTS after immersion in distilled water at 37°C for both the composite resin alkasite and zirconia-reinforced GIC.
Conclusion: It can be concluded that storage conditions affect the microhardness and DTS of resin composite Alkasite and Zirconia-reinforced GIC

Keywords: Composite resin alkasite; diametral tensile strength; microhardness; storage conditions; zirconia-reinforced GIC

  1. Todd J-C. Cention N Scientific Documentation. Liechtenstein: Ivoclar Vivadent Press, 2016.
  2. Chalissery VP, et al., Study of the mechanical properties of the novel zirconia-reinforced glass ionomer cement. J. Contemp. Dent. Pract. 2016; 17: 394–398.
  3. Annusavice K, Chen S, Rawls H. Phillip’s Science of Dental Material. 12th ed. Elsevier Ltd, 2012, pp. 255–340.
  4. Sharafeddin F, Azar M, Feizi N, Salehi R. Evaluation of Surface Microhardness of Silver and Zirconia Reinforced Glass-ionomers with and without Microhydroxyapatite. J. Dent. Biomater. 2017; 4: 454–460.
  5. Bona AD, Pecho OE, Alessandretti R. Zirconia as a dental biomaterial. Materials (Basel) 2015; 8: 4978–4991.
  6. Sakaguchi R, Powers J. Craig’s Restorative Dental Materials. 13th ed. Elsevier Mosby, 2012; pp. 60, 63, 101-104, 173–200.
  7. Ilie N. Comparative effect of self or dual-curing on polymerization kinetics and mechanical properties in a novel, dental-resin-based composite with alkaline filler. Materials 2018; 11: 108–120.
  8. Patel A, Dalal D, Lakade L, Shah P. Comparative Evaluation of Compressive Strength and Diametral Tensile Strength of Zirconomer , Ketac Molar and Type IX GIC – an in– vitro study. Int. J. Curr. Res. 2018; 10: 91–94.
  9. Haruyama A et al., Influence of different rubber dam application on intraoral temperature and relative humidity. Bull. Tokyo Dent. Coll. 2014; 55: 11–17.
  10. Almozainy M. Influence of storage temperature on Vickers microhardness of resin composite. Ann. Essences Dent., 2018; 10: 1–11.
  11. Al-Samadani K. Surface Microhardness of Dental Composite Resin Restorations in Response to Preventive Agents. J. Contemp. Dent. Pract. 2016; 17: 978–984.
  12. Nagi SM, Moharam LM, Zaazou MH. Effect of resin thickness, and curing time on the micro-microhardness of bulk-fill resin composites. J. Clin. Exp. Dent. 2015; 7: 600–604.
  13. Mann J, Sharma S, Maurya S, Suman A. Cention N: A Review. Int. J. Curr. Res. 2018 10: 69111–69112.
  14. Gajewski VES, Pfeifer CS, Fróes-Salgado NRG, Boaro LCC, Braga RR. Monomers used in resin composites: Degree of conversion, mechanical properties and water sorption/solubility. Braz. Dent. J. 2012; 23: 508–514.
  15. Kuter B, Eden E, Yildiz H. The effect of heat on the mechanical properties of glass ionomer cements. Eur. J. Paediatr. Dent. 2013; 14: 90–94.
  16. Chun KJ, Lee JY. Comparative study of mechanical properties of dental restorative materials and dental hard tissues in compressive loads. J. Dent. Biomech. 2014; 5: 1–6.
  17. Gorseta K, Glavina D, Skrinjaric T, Czarnecka B, Nicholson JW. The effect of petroleum jelly, light-cured varnish and different storage media on the flexural strength of glass ionomer dental cements. Acta Biomater. Odontol. Scand. 2016; 2: 55–59.
  18. Dehurtevent M, Deveaux E, Hornez JC, Robberecht L, Tabary N, Chai F. Influence of heat and ultrasonic treatments on the setting and maturation of a glass-ionomer cement. Am J Dent. 2015; 28(2):105-10.
  19. Lima RBW, Farias JFG, Andrade AKM, Silva FDSCM, Duarte RM. Water sorption and solubility of glass ionomer cements indicated for atraumatic restorative treatment considering the time and the pH of the storage solution. Rev Gaúch Odontol. 2018; 66(1): 29-34.
  20. Sharafeddin F, Shoale S, Kowkabi M. Effects of different percentages of microhydroxyapatite on microhardness of resin-modified glass-ionomer and zirconomer. J. Clin. Exp. Dent. 2017; 9: 805–811.
  21. Al-Shaafi M. Effects of Different Temperatures and Storage Time on the Degree of Conversion and Microhardness of Resin-based Composites. J. Contemp. Dent. Pr. 2016; 17: 217–223.
  22. Karimzadeh A, Ayatollahi MR, Shirazi HA. Mechanical Properties of a Dental Nano-Composite in Moist Media Determined by Nano-Scale Measurement. Int. J. Mater. Mech. Manuf. 2014; 2: 67–72.
  23. Shofu. Zirconomer Improved. 2016. Retrieved 5 June 2019, from: http://shofu.com.sg/Shofu-Dental-Materials-Equipment-Instruments-Product-Detail-127-Zirconomer Improved.
  24. Abdulsamee N, Elkhadem A (2017). Zirconomer and zirconomer improved (white amalgams): Restorative materials for the future. Review. EC Dent. Sci. 2017; 15: 134–50.
  25. Rahman IA, Ghazali NAM, Bakar WZW, Masudi SM. Modification of glass ionomer cement by incorporating nanozirconia-hydroxyapatite-silica nano-powder composite by the one-pot technique for microhardness and aesthetics improvement. Ceram. Int. 2017; 43: 13247–13253.

Lisensi Creative Commons
This work is licensed under a Lisensi Creative Commons Atribusi-BerbagiSerupa 4.0 Internasional.
Contact us: Odonto Dental Journal: Jl. Raya Kaligawe Km.4, PO BOX 1054/SM Semarang, Central Java, Indonesia, 50112. Email: odontodentaljournal@unissula.ac.id
apps