LEGAL PROTECTION OF DOCTORS IN PROVIDING HEALTH SERVICES
Abstract
Cases of alleged malpractice committed by doctors or health workers have become an interesting issue that has been widely discussed by the public. Malpractice is basically due to the emergence of differences in perception between patients and doctors or health workers. The research method used in this study is library research, library research limits its activities to library collections. While the approach used in this study is normative juridical, the results of the study mentioned that the standards that must be met by doctors to obtain legal protection are professional standards, operational procedures standards, and medical service standards. These three standards, doctors are also obliged to make informed consent as part of health service standards, and carry out the obligations as contained in Article 51 of Law No. 29 of 2004 concerning Medical Practice. In addition, doctors can be free from allegations of medical malpractice when providing health services in accordance with professional standards and operational procedures, providing medical services based on informed consent and the principle of non-vit inura volenti law or the assumption of risk, respectable minority rules and error of in judgment, as well as contribution negligence.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Adami Chazawi, 2007, Malpraktik Kedokteran; Tinjauan Norma dan Doktrin Hukum, Bayu Media Publishing, Malang;
Adami Chazawi, 2016, Malpraktik Kedokteran, Penerbit Sinar Grafika, Jakarta;
Adnan Murya dan Urip Sucipto, 2019, Etika dan Tanggung Jawab Profesi, Deepublish, Yogyakarta;
Ari Yunanto, 2010, Hukum Pidana Malpraktik Dokter; Tinjauan dan Perspektif Medikolegal, Pt. Andi, Yogyakarta;
Endang Kusuma Astuti, 2009, Transaksi Terapeutik dalam Upaya Pelayanan Medis di Rumah Sakit, Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung;
Hardisman, Opini Masyarakat tentang Malpraktek Kedokteran, Majalah Kedokteran Andalas, No.1, Vol. 36, 2012;
J. B. Suharjo B. Cahyono, 2013, Menjadi Pasien Cerdas, Pt. Gramedia Pustaka Utama, Jakarta;
Michelle Gabriele Monica Rompis, perlindungan hukum terhadap dokter Yang diduga melakukan medical malpraktik, Lex Crimen, Vol VI No.4 Jun 2017;
Muntaha, 2017, Hukum Pidana Malapraktik Pertanggungjawabn dan Penghapusan Pidana, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta;
Mustika Zed, 2008, Metodologi Penelitian Kepustakaan, Yayasan Obor Indonesia, Jakarta;
Novita Listyaningrum, Informed Consent dalam Perlindungan Dokter yang Melakukan Euthanaisa, Journal Advokasi, Vol. 6, No. 1, 2016;
Nusye K.I. Jayanti, 2009, Penyelesaian Hukum dalam Malpraktek Kedokteran, Pustaka Yustisia, Yogyakarta;
Satjipto Rahardjo, 2000, Ilmu Hukum, Pt. Citra Aditya, Bandung, 2000;
Setyo Tresnadi, Perlindungan Hukum Profesi Dokter dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Medis, Jurnal Pembaharuan Hukum, Vol. IV, No. 1, 2017;
Soerjono Soekanto dan Sri Mamudji, 2001, Penelitian Hukum Normatif (Suatu Tinjauan Singkat), Rajawali Pers, Jakarta;
Sofwan Dahlan, 2006, Malpraktik; Simposium Pencegahan dan Penanganan Kasus Dugaan Malpraktik, Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang;
Sutarno, 2014, Hukum Kesehatan; Eutanasia, Keadilan, dan Hukum Positif di Indonesia, Setara Press, Malang;
Syahrul Machmud, 2008, Penegakan Hukum dan Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Dokter yang Diduga Melakukan Medikal Praktek, Penerbit Cv. Mandar Maju, Bandung;
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.26532/ijlr.v4i1.9634
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
International Journal of Law Reconstruction Indexed by :
 | International Journal of Law Recnstruction | |
| Faculty of Law, Unissula | Copyright of International Journal of Law Reconstruction | |
| Jalan Kaligawe Raya KM.4, Terboyo Kulon, Genuk, | E-ISSN 2580-9245 (Online) | |
| Semarang, Central Java, Indonesia, 50112 | IJLR is licensed under a |