THE RELEVANCE OF PANCASILA JUSTICE IN IMPLEMENTING STATE ADMINISTRATIVE COURT DECISIONS
Abstract
Administrative law in its development has two dimensions, on the one hand guarantee the realization of state power balance and includes the relationship between the relevant state institutions and on the other hand guarantee the harmonization between the function and duties of the state with the ideals of the nation, it is also clear that the administrative law is a realized media From the concept of limitation of power as it becomes the core of a constitutional democracy, the method of approaching normative juridical, the results of the study stated that the issue of the implementation of the State Administrative Court's court ruling depend on the moral ethics of public officials, has made a state administrative court ruling difficult to exceed in reality in society. Such conditions have contrary to the principle of the Litit of the Oportet which requires every case there must be finally because the purpose of the case of the court to the court is certainly to get a solution. Pancasila justice is a basic principle must be implemented in the decision of the State Administrative Court to realize the certainty of law and justice needed by the community.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
• Book:
Bagir Manan, 2010, Menjaga Kemerdekaan Pers Di Pusaran Hukum, Dewan Pers, Jakarta;
Johnny Ibrahim, 2013, Teori dan Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Normatif, Bayumedia, Malang;
Lintong O Siahaan, 2007, Eksekusi Putusan di Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara Setelah Amandemen, Perum Percetakan Negara RI, Jakarta;
Paulus Effendi Lotulung, 2013, Hukum Tata Usaha Negara dan Kekuasaan, Penerbit Salemba Humanika, Jakarta;
Paul Scholten dalam Oeripan Notohamidjoyo, 1975, Demi Keadilan Dan Kemanusiaan: Beberapa Bab Dari Filsafat Hukum, BPK. Gunung Mulia, Jakarta;
Peter Mahmud, 2005, Penelitian Hukum, Prenadamedia Group, Jakarta;
R. Soegijatno Tjakranegara, 2002, Hukum Acara Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara di Indonesia, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta;
Soerjono Soekanto, 1983, Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Penegakan. Hukum, PT. Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta;
Susan Rose-Ackerman dan Peter L. Lindseth, 2010, Comparative Administrative Law, Reseach Handbook in Comparative Law, Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, Massachuttes;
Utrecht dalam Soerjono Soekanto, 1985, Teori Yang Murni Tentang Hukum, PT. Alumni, Bandung;
Walton H. Hamilton, 1931, Constitutionalism, Encyclopedia of Social Sciences, Edwin Seligman R. A. & Alvin Jhonson;
• Journal:
Bibianus Hengky Widhi Antoro, Pengujian Penyalahgunaan Wewenang Di Ptun Kajian Putusan PTUN Medan Nomor 25/G/2015/PTUN-MDN dan Putusan PTUN Jambi Nomor 2/P/PW/2017/PTUN.JBI, Jurnal Yudisial. Vol. 13 No. 2 Agustus 2020;
Diseth dan Hoglend dalam Dewa Gede Atmadja, Asas-asas Hukum dalam Sistem Hukum, Jurnal Kertha Wicaksana, Volume 12 Nomor 2, 2018;
Djunaedi, Tinjauan Yuridis Tugas Dan Kewenangan Jaksa Demi Tercapainya Nilai-Nilai Keadilan, Jurnal Pembaharuan Hukum, Volume I No.1 Januari-April 2014;
E Fernando M Manulang dalam Bambang Arwanto, Perlindungan Hukum bagi Rakyat akibat Tindakan Faktual Pemerintah, Jurnal Yuridika, Volume 31 No 3, September 2016;
Haydn Washington, et al., Foregrounding Ecojustice in Conservation, Biological Conservation, Vol. 228, 2018;
J. Parchomiuk, Abuse of discretionary powers in Administrative Law, Evolution of the judicial review models: from administrative morality to the principle of proportionality, Casopis Pro Pravni Vedu Praxis, XXVI(3), 2018;
Mohammad Afifudin Soleh, Eksekusi Terhadap Putusan Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara Yang Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap, Mimbar Keadilan Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Februari 2018;
Muchamad Arif Agung Nugroho, Pelaksanaan Putusan Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara tentang Upaya Paksa, The Digest: Journal of Legisprudence and Jurisprudence, Vol. No.1 June 2020;
N. S. Rini, Penyalahgunaan kewenangan administrasi dalam Undang-Undang Tindak Pidana Korupsi, Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure, Vol. 18, 2018;
Nico Utama Handoko dan Anna Erliyana, Kekuatan Eksekutorial Putusan PTUN dan Implikasi dalam Pelaksanaannya, Jurnal Pakual Law Review, Volume 06 Nomor 02, Juli-Desember 2020;
Paulus Lotulong dalam Nico Utama Handoko dan Anna Erliyana, Kekuatan Eksekutorial Putusan PTUN dan Implikasi dalam Pelaksanaannya, Jurnal Pakual Law Review Volume 06 Nomor 02, Juli-Desember 2020;
Surajiyo, Keadilan Dalam Sistem Hukum Pancasila, IKRAITH-humanira, Vol 2 No 3 November 2018;
Untoro, Self-Rescpect dan Kesadaran Hukum Pejabat Tata Usaha Negara Menuju Keadilan, Pandecta, Volume 13 Number 1 June 2018;
Willy Riawan Tjandra, Dinamika Keadilan Dan Kepastian Hukum Dalam Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara, Mimbar Hukum Edisi Khusus, November 2011;
Yunie Herawati, The Concept of Social Justice Within The Fifth Principle Framework of Pancasila, Jurnal Paradigma, Volume 18, Nomor 1, Januari 2014;
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.26532/ijlr.v5i1.15646
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
International Journal of Law Reconstruction Indexed by :
 | International Journal of Law Recnstruction | |
| Faculty of Law, Unissula | Copyright of International Journal of Law Reconstruction | |
| Jalan Kaligawe Raya KM.4, Terboyo Kulon, Genuk, | E-ISSN 2775-8885 (Online) | |
| Semarang, Central Java, Indonesia, 50112 | IJLR is licensed under a |