Editorial Policies

Focus and Scope

Jurnal Ekonomi dan Bisnis focuses on research results and critical reviews of :

  • marketing management,
  • human resource management,
  • operational management,
  • financial management,
  • strategic management and
  • accounting management.

 

Section Policies

Articles

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

EKOBIS (Vol.10 No.1 2009)

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

EKOBIS (Vol.10 No.2 2009)

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

EKOBIS (Vol.11 No.1 2010)

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

EKOBIS (Vol.11 No.2 2010)

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

EKOBIS (Vol.12 No.1 2011)

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

EKOBIS (Vol.12 No.2 2011)

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

EKOBIS (Vol.13 No.1 2012)

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

EKOBIS (Vol.14 No.1 2013)

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

EKOBIS (Vol.14 No.2 2013)

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

EKOBIS (Vol.15 No.1 2014)

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

EKOBIS (Vol.15 No.2 2014)

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

EKOBIS (Vol.16 No.1 2015)

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed
 

Peer Review Process

The articles included in Jurnal Ekonomi dan Bisnis will be reviewed by a minimum of 2 qualified partners. The decision whether the article is received or rejected is determined by the board meeting of the editor. This decision is based on the comments of some of our expert partners. The article will also have plagiarism test with Turnitin application

 

Publication Frequency

Jurnal Ekonomi dan Bisnis is published twice in a year:

1. January

2. July

 

Open Access Policy

This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.

 

Plagiarism Screening

Manuscripts submitted to Jurnal Ekonomi dan Bisnis will be screened for plagiarism and self-plagiarism using TURNITIN and Google-based search engines. Depending on the level of originality and similarities with other documents, the managing editor will decide on whether to immediately reject the manuscripts, contact authors for further clarifications, or to proceed to the blind peer-review process.

 

Publication Ethics

Jurnal Ekonomi dan Bisnis is a scientific publication that contains research and thought results in the field of Economics and Business that have never been published. This statement of scientific code is a statement of all parties involved in the publication process of research journals which includes managers, editors, external reviewer, and authors. This statement of code of ethics for scientific publications is based Peraturan Kepala LIPI Nomor 5 Tahun 2014 tentang Kode Etika Publikasi Ilmiah. The ethics of scientific publications uphold three ethical values in publications, namely (i) Neutrality, which is free from conflicting interests in the management of publications; (ii) Justice, namely giving authorship rights to those entitled as authors / writers; and (iii) Honesty, i.e. free from duplication, fabrication, falsification and plagiarism (DF2P) in publications.

 

JOURNAL MANAGERS

  1. Determine the name of the journal, scope of scholarship, scale, and submission of accreditation if necessary. Determine the membership of the editorial board.
  2. Define the relationship between the publisher, editor, bestari partner, and other parties in a contract.
  3. Respect matters that are confidential, both for researchers who contribute, authors / writers, editors, and bestari partners.
  4. Applying norms and provisions regarding intellectual property rights, especially copyright.
  5. Reviewing journal policies and submitting them to the author / writer, editorial board, bestari partners, and readers.
  6. Making guidelines on rules and ethical behavior for editors and bestari partners.
  7. Publish journals regularly.
  8. Guarantee the availability of financial resources for the sustainability of journal publishing.
  9. Building a network of cooperation between research institutions and related institutions
  10. Prepare permits and other aspects of legality.

 

EDITOR

  1. Publication decisions: The editors are responsible for deciding articles that have been received by the editorial board for publication. Editors can refer to the policies of the journal editorial board and are limited by applicable legal provisions regarding defamation, copyright infringement and plagiarism. The editors can also negotiate with other editors or reviewers in making decisions.
  2. Fair play: Editor can at any time evaluate the contents of the text regardless of race, sex, sexual orientation, religion, ethnicity, citizenship, or political philosophy of the author.
  3. Confidentiality: The editor and each editorial staff must not disclose any information about the manuscript submitted to anyone other than the writer, reviewer, potential reviewer, editorial advisor and publisher.
  4. Disclosure and conflicts of interest: Material in manuscripts that are sent and not published in a journal, may not be used in editor's research, without the written consent of the author.

 

REVIEWER

  1. Contribution to Editorial Decisions: Reviewers help the editor in making editorial decisions and through editorial communication with the author, can help the writer improve the manuscript. Reviewers are also expected to provide suggestions for improvements to the results of the review.
  2. Promptness: Every reviewer who feels ineligible to review research reported in a manuscript or conduct a manuscript review quickly, must notify the editor and not be involved in the review process. Invited reviewers must also confirm their willingness / unwillingness to review the article.
  3. Confidentiality: Every text received for review must be treated as a confidential document. The texts do not have to be displayed or discussed with other parties unless obtained permission from the editor.
  4. Standards of Objectivity: Reviews must be done objectively. The author is not allowed to do criticism in person. The reviewer must provide clear information about the results of the review along with supporting arguments.
  5. Acknowledgment of Sources: Reviewers must identify published papers that are relevant and that have not been cited by the author. Statements about observations, derivations or arguments that have been previously reported must be accompanied by relevant citations. The reviewer must also coordinate with the editor about the substantial similarity between the manuscript being considered and other articles that have been published through the knowledge of the editor and reviewer.
  6. Disclosure and Conflict of Interest: Information or ideas obtained from peer reviews must be kept confidential and not used for personal gain. Reviewers are not allowed to consider a text that is caused by a conflict of interest, collaborative or other interests with the author, the company, or related institutions.

 

AUTHOR

  1. Reporting Standards: Authors must present reports and accurate data from research results. The research article must contain sufficient detailed information and references. Fraudulent intentional content of manuscripts is unethical and unacceptable behavior.
  2. Originality and Plagiarism: Authors must ensure the originality of their work and provide clear information / sources when using citations. Authors are not allowed to publish their research manuscripts in more than one journal because sending the same manuscript to more than one journal simultaneously is unethical and unacceptable behavior.
  3. Acknowledgment of Sources: Proper recognition of the work of others must always be included. Authors must cite publications that have been used to base the making of a scientific work.
  4. Authorship of the Paper: Writing must be limited to researchers who have made a significant contribution to the conception, design, implementation, or interpretation of the reported research. All researchers who have made significant contributions must be registered as co-authors. Researchers who participate in substantive aspects of a study must be recognized or registered as contributors. The main author must ensure that the co-authors are indeed eligible for inclusion in the list of researchers and all authors must see and agree to the final version of the manuscript to be published.
  5. Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest: Every writer must disclose in their manuscript any substantive financial or interest that might be interpreted to influence the results of a manuscript.
  6. Fundamental errors in published works: If the writer finds errors or inaccuracies in the published manuscript, the author is expected to notify the journal editor or publisher and work with the editor to retract or correct the manuscript