Authority of The Notary Regional Supervisory Assembly to Issue a Client's Document Return Order

Abstract

The problem in this article is How the Authority of the Regional Supervisory Council Issuing a Notary for Returning Client Documents and the factors that affect the implementation of the Regional Supervisory Council's authority in issuing a Notary for Returning Client Documents.

The method used is a juridical approach method. The result of this research is that the Regional Notary Supervisory Council exceeds its authority in issuing a Notary Letter for Returning Client Documents because it is not in accordance with the authority of the Notary Regional Supervisory Council as stated in UUJN and Regulation of the Minister of Law and Human Rights No. 40 of 2015, where it is stated that those who have the authority to make decisions and impose sanctions are the Regional Supervisory Council, the Central Supervisory Council and the Minister of Law and Human Rights. The result of further research is that the Order to Notary for the Return of Client Documents was issued by the Regional Notary Supervisory Council of South Jakarta after considering the reporter's statement regarding the chronology of the case of the detention of valuable documents belonging to the FXCB reporter, Request for Return of Documents from Reporting Party through his Proxy to Notary HP SH. who intends to take the original documents from the Notary office of HP, SH. and Public Complaints Session meetings by the Regional Supervisory Council.

Keywords: Authority, Regional Notary Supervisory Council, Document Return Order