The Problems with Apartments and Land Acquisition in Australia for Foreign Citizens (An International Overview)

Margaret Glompy

Abstract


This research aims to determine the quality of apartment buildings in Australia which are now in the spotlight, after the last case experienced by residents of the Mascot Towers complex in Sydney. They had to be evacuated because of cracks in the building. Previously also in Sydney, about 3,000 residents of the Opal Towers apartment were evacuated due to the collapse of the building's supporting beams. This research is a qualitative research in which the researchers themselves are engaged in the field as a key instrument. The results and discussion show that a number of apartment owners in other cities who were contacted explained that they are now worried that the structure of their apartment buildings is not safe to live in. They also had to pay for the damage themselves. One of them is John Grant, who owns an apartment in Canberra that he bought for $640,000 in 2011. Not long ago, cracks appeared that spread across the floor of the apartment parking lot. Grant said he had information that the crack could be repaired, but that the cost was estimated at $9 million. If this cost is to be borne by the owners of the apartments in the complex, each must pay $75,000. The conclusion in this study is that due to the inconvenience of existing apartments, apartment owners are now filing lawsuits against contractors, developers and designers of their apartment buildings. 

Keywords


Apartments; Construction; Land.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Hansen, P. (1993, August). The duty of care, the business judgment rules, and the American Law Institute Corporate Governance Project. Business Lawyer, 48, 1355–1359.

Hawley, J. P., & Williams, A. T. (2001). The rise of fiduciary capitalism in the United States. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

Heidrick & Struggles. (2006). The board of directors’ role in CEO succession, Q & A with Heidrick & Struggles. In Building high-performance boards. Chicago: Author.

Hinsey, J. (2006) Corporate governance activists are headed in the wrong direction. Working Knowledge, Harvard Business School.

Holland, K. (2005, May). Review of the book Corporate governance: Law, theory and policy. Law and Politics Book Review, 15(5), 444–448.

Ide, R. W. (2003). Post-Enron corporate governance opportunities—Creating a culture of greater board collaboration and oversight. Mercer Law Review, 54(3), 838.

Institute of Internal Auditors. (2006). The audit committee—purpose, process, professionalism. Altamonte Springs, FL: Author.

Institutional Shareholder Services. (2006). Corporate governance: From compliance obligation to business imperative. Global Institutional Investor Study. Rockville, MD: Author.

Jensen, M. C. (2001). Value maximization, stakeholder theory, and the corporate objective function. European Financial Management Review, 7(3), 297–317.

Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3, 305–360.

Jones, D. E. (2007). Corporate crisis: The readiness is all. Heidrick & Struggles Governance Letter. Chicago: Heidrick & Struggles.

ETC.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30659/jdh.v6i4.34930

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


View My Stats

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.


Jurnal Daulat Hukum has been indexed in:

sinta google_scholar moraref garuda neliti Dimension Base