AN IMPLICATIONS OF THE DEBTOR'S DEFAULT ON THE EXECUTION OF TWO-WHEEL MOTORCYCLES WITHOUT A FIDUCIARY GUARANTEE CERTIFICATE

Sanusi Sanusi, Nuridin Nuridin

Abstract


This research aims to explain to the public regarding fiduciary issues as well as the consequences that the finance company will receive if it assigns a debt collector forcibly withdrawing two-wheeled motorized vehicles without a fiduciary guarantee deed. This paper uses normative legal research with a statutory regulatory approach (Statuta Opproach). The results of this research show that the execution of the fiduciary guarantee object cannot be carried out whether they have a fiduciary guarantee deed or not, except based on the debtor's voluntariness or based on a court decision which says that the debtor is in default, This is based on the decision of the Constitutional Court which said the sound of article 15 paragraph (2) of Law No. 42 of 1999 is unconstitutional.


Keywords


default, debtor, motorcycle, two wheels, guarantee, fiduciary

Full Text:

PDF

References


Journals:

Andin Sofyannoor., Prosedur Penanganan Gadai Saham Yang Melakukan Wanprestasi, Jentera: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Vol. 3, No. 2, 2019;

Ari Wirya Dinata., Lembaga Jaminan Fidusia: Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 18/PUU-XVIX/2019, Nagari Law Rewiew, Vol. 3, No. 2, 2020;

Benny Krestian Heriawanto., Pelaksanaan Eksekusi Objek Jaminan Fidusia Berdasarkan Title Eksekutorial, Legality: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Vol. 27, No. 1, 2019;

Egi Adriyan Karendra., Pelaksanaan Perjanjian Kredit di PT. Federa Internastional Finance Group Cabang Teluk Kuantan Kabupaten Kuantan Singingi yang telah diterbitkan J, Juhan Perak, Vol. 1, No. 1, 2020;

Eko Suryo Presetyo., Implikasi Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 18/ PUU-XVII/2019 Terhadap Pelaksana Eksekusi Lembaga Jaminan, Refleksi Hukum: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Vol. 5, No. 1, 2020;

Fira Amalia Sugianto dan Rani Apriani., Pandangan Aspek Hukum Terhadap Peranan dan Efektivitas Fidusia Sebagai Lembaga Jaminan, Jurnal Meta-Yuridis, Vol. 4, No. 2, 2021;

Gentur Cahyo Setiono dan Herry Sulistyo Satriyani Cahyo Widayanti., Cidera Janji Dalam Perjanjian Kredit Jaminan Fidusia, Jurnal Transparansi Hukum, Vol. 4, No. 1, 2021;

Harniawati., Perjanjian Dengan Jaminan Fidusia Berdasarkan Peraturan Menteri Keuangan Republik Indonesia Nomor 130/PMK.010/2012, EnsIklopedia Of Journal, Vol. 3, No. 4, 2021;

Ismail Koto dan Faisal., Penerapan Eksekusi Jaminan Fidusia Pada Benda Bergerak Terhadap Debitur Wnprestasi, Journal Of Education, Humaniora and Social Sciences (JEHSS), Vol. 4, No. 2, 2021;

Kadek Cintya Dwi Lestari, Nyoman Putu Budiartha, dan Ni Made Puspatusari Ujianti., Hilangnya Objek Jaminan Fidusia Yng Tidak Didaftarkan, Jurnal Analogi Hukum, Vol. 2, No. 3, 2020;

Khifni Kafa Rufaida dan Rian Sucipto., Tinjauan Hukum Terhadap Objek Eksekusi Fidusia Tanpa Titel Eksekusi, Refleksi Hukum: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Vol. 4, No. 1, 2019;

Muhammad Ikhsan Awaljon Putra., Eksekusi Terhadap Benda Jaminan Fidusia Yang Tidak DIdaftarkan Pada PT. Capella Multidana, JOM Fakultas Hukum, Vol. III, No. I, 2016;

Robert Bouzen dan Ashibly., Pelaksanaan eksekusi jaminan fidusia terhadap debitur Yang wanprestasi setelah keluarnya putusan Mahkamah konstitusi Nomor 18/puu-Xvii/2019, Jurnal Gagasan Hukum, Vol. 03, No. 02, 2021;

Roma Barunami Olivia., Eksekusi Jaminan Fidusia Berdasarkan Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 2/PUU-XIX/2021, Jurnal Darma Agung, Vol. 31, No. 4, 2023;

Suhaila Zulkifli, Tiara Yunita Sundari, dan Mario Hans Kristian Silalahi., Penyelesaian Wanprestasi Dalam Perjanjian Kredit Multi Guna (Studi di PT Bank Sumut), Jurnal Darma Agung, Vol. 30, 2022;

Suriono., Tanggung Jawab Pemberi Fidusia Terhadap Benda Jaminan Dalam Perjanjian Kredit, Jurnal Ilmiah “Advokasi”, Vol. 07, No. 02, 2019;

Syafrida dan Ralang Hartati., Eksekusi Jaminan Fidusia Setelah Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 18/PUU/XVII/2019, ADIL: Jurnal Hukum, Vol. 11, No. 1, 2020;

Syahron Sahputra., Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Terhadap Pengalihan Benda Jaminan Fidusia dalam Perjanjian Kredit, Jurnal Ilmiah “Advokasi” , Vol. 8, No. 1, 2020;

Wiwin Dwi Ratna Febriyanti., Eksekusi Objek Jaminan Fidusia Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 18/PUUXVII/2019, Adhaper, Vol. 6, No. 2, 2020;

Books:

Dodi Oktarino., 2021, Hukum Bisnis Perjanjian Kredit dan Jaminan Pemegang Saham. Guepedia, Bogor;

Dwi Tatak Subagiyo., 2018, Hukum Jaminan Dalam Perspektif Undang-Undang Jaminan Fidusia (Suatu Pengantar), UWKS Press, Surabaya;

Hendra Arjuna dan Atika Thahira., 2021, Kumpulan Catata Pengertian Dasar Tentang Hukum, CV. Jakad Media Publishing, Surabaya;

Klaudius Ilkam Hulu., 2021, Problematika Perjanjian Kredit, CV Lutfi Gilang, Jawa Tengah;

Yaman., 2016, Karakteristik Wanprestasi Dan Tindak Pidana Penipuan., 2 ed. Kencana;




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.26532/jph.v10i3.33598

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Jurnal Pembaharuan Hukum Indexed by :

google_scholar onesearch crossref garuda base dimension DOAJ sinta
Jurnal Pembaharuan Hukum  
Faculty of Law, UnissulaCopyright of Jurnal Pembaharuan Hukum
Jalan Kaligawe Raya KM.4, Terboyo Kulon, Genuk,ISSN 2580-3085 (Online) ISSN 2355-0481 (Print)
Semarang, Central Java, Indonesia, 50112JPH is licensed under a