THE LEGAL RESPONSIBILITY OF DEBTOR TO PAYMENT CURATORS IN BANKRUPTCY SITUATION

Didi Sukardi

Abstract


The Law on Bankruptcy and the Obligation to Postpone Debt Payment does not explicitly stipulate that the obligation to pay the Curator's fee is borne by the Applicant, the Debtor or the Applicant and the Debtor jointly. The obligation to pay the curator fee is imposed through the determination of the Court of Judges who decides the bankruptcy case on the Curator's Application based on the details submitted by the Curator after hearing the considerations of the Supervisory Judge. The approach method used is a normative juridical approach the curator fees. according to Act No. 37 of 2004 concerning Bankruptcy and the Obligation to Postpone Debt Payment is not absolute, because the obligation to pay the Curator's fee can be imposed on the Applicant for the Declaration of Bankruptcy, the Bankrupt Debtor, or on the Petitioner for the Declaration of Bankruptcy and the Debtor for Bankruptcy jointly through the Determination of the Panel of Judges who decides the Bankruptcy Application.


Keywords


Curators; Legal Responsibility; Payment.

Full Text:

PDF

References


• Books :

Ahmada Yani & Gunawan Widjaja, 1999, Seri Hukum Bisnis Kepailitan, Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta;

Bernadete Waluyo, 1999, Hukum Kepailitan dan Penundaan Pembayaran Utang, Cetakan I, Mandar Maju, Bandung;

Imran Nating, 2005, Peranan Dan Tanggung Jawab Kurator Dalam Pengurusan Dan Pemberesan Kepailitan, Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta;

Jerry Hoff, 2000, Undang Undang Kepailitan Indonesia, Penerjemah Kartini Mulyadi, Tatanusa, Jakarta;

Munir Fuady, 2014, Hukum Pailit dalam Teori dan Praktek, Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung;

Rahayu Hartini, 2007, Edisi Revisi Hukum Kepailitan, UMM Press, Malang;

Sutan Remy Sjahdeini, 2002, Hukum Kepailitan (Memahami faillissementsverordening Juncto Undang-Undang No. 4 Tahun 1998), Pustaka Utama Grafiti, Jakarta;

Sutan Remy Sjahdeini, 2010, Hukum Kepailitan Memahami Undang-undang No. 37 Tahun 2004 Tentang Kepailitan, PT. Pustaka Utama Grafiti, Jakarta;

• Journals :

Anis Mashdurohatun, Ideal Construction On Credit Agreement With Fiduciary Guarantee Based On Justice Value, TEST Engineering & Management, March-April 2020;

Anis Mashdurohatun & Nilna Kamaliya, Legal Protection Of Consumer Reviews In Social Media Based On Local Wisdom Values, International Journal of Advanced Science and Technology, Vol. 29, No. 6, (2020);

Arkisman, Pelaksanaan Tugas Kurator Dalam Mengurus Harta Pailit Berdasarkan Pasal 72 Undang-Undang No. 37 Tahun 2004 Tentang Kepailitan Dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang, Jurnal Pro Hukum, Vol. IV, No. 1, June 2015;

Dedy Tri Hartono, Perlindungan Hukum Kreditor Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Kepailitan, Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Legal Opinion, Edisi I, Volume 4, 2016;

Dewi Tuti Muryati, Dhian Septiandani, Efy Yulistyowati, Pengaturan Tanggung Jawab Kurator Terhadap Pengurusan dan Pemberesan Harta Pailit Dalam Kaitannya Dengan Hak Kreditor Separatis, Jurnal Dinamika Sosial Budaya, Volume 19, Nomor 1, June 2017;

Fazlur Rahman, Prinsip Keadilan Dalam Penetapan Imbalan Jasa Kurator Jika Putusan Pailit Dibatalkan (Studi Putusan Kasus Kepailitan PT Telekomunikasi Selular), Jurnal Hukum, Vol 1 No. 1, 2014;

Haposan Sialagan, Masalah Putusan Ultra Petita dalam Pengujian Undang-Undang, Jurnal Mimbar Hukum, Vol. 22 No. 1, February 2010;

Izzy Al Kautsar, Danang Wahyu Muhammad, Urgensi Pembaharuan Asas-Asas Hukum Pada Undang-Undang No 37 Tahun 2004 Berdasarkan Teori Keadilan Distributif, Jurnal Panorama Hukum, Vol. 5 No. 2 December 2020;

Kornelius Benuf, Muhamad Azhar, Metodologi Penelitian Hukum sebagai Instrumen Mengurai Permasalahan Hukum Kontemporer, Jurnal Gema Keadilan, Volume 7 Edisi I, June 2020;

Laurensius Arliman S, Peranan Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Di Dalam Perkembangan Ilmu Hukum di Indonesia, Soumatera Law Review, Vol 1, No 1, 2018;

Moch Zulkarnain Al Mufti, Tanggung Jawab Kurator dalam Penjualan Harta Pailit di Bawah Harga Pasar, Lex Renaissance, No. 1 Vol. 1 January 2016;

Muhammad Syeisar Nanda Prawira, Suratman, Faisol, Pertanggungjawaban Kurator Karena Menyebabkan Timbulnya Kerugian Dalam Pemberesan Harta Pailit, Dinamika Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum, Vol 27, No 5, January 2021;

Niru Anita Sinaga, Nunuk Sulisrudatin, Hukum Kepailitan dan Permasalahannya di Indonesia, Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Dirgantara-Fakultas Hukum Universitas Dirgantara Marsekal Suryadarma, Volume 7 No. 1, September 2016;

Sukses M. P. Siburian, Hak dan Kewajiban Kurator Pasca Putusan Pembatalan Pailit Pada Tingkat Kasasi Oleh Mahkamah Agung (Studi Kasus Kepailitan PT. Telkomsel VS PT. Prima Jaya Informatika), USU Law Journal, Vol.3.No.1 (April 2015);

Tata Wijayanta, Kajian Tentang Pengaturan Syarat Kepailitan menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 37 Tahun 2004, Mimbar Hukum, Volume 26 No 1 February 2014;

Widjanarko, Dampak Implementasi Undang-Undang Kepailitan Terhadap Sektor Perbankan, Jurnal Hukum Bisnis, Volume 8 1999;

• Regulations:

Act No. 37 of 2004 concerning Bankruptcy and Suspension of Debt Payment Obligations;

Decree of The Minister of Justice of The Republic of Indonesia Number : M.09-HT.05.10 of 1998 Concerning Guidelines For The Amount oF Services Rewards For Curators and Management;

Regulation of the Minister of Law and Human Rights No. 1 of 2013 concerning Guidelines for Rewards for Curators and Management;




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.26532/jph.v8i2.15905

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Jurnal Pembaharuan Hukum Indexed by :

google_scholar onesearch crossref garuda base dimension DOAJ sinta
Jurnal Pembaharuan Hukum  
Faculty of Law, UnissulaCopyright of Jurnal Pembaharuan Hukum
Jalan Kaligawe Raya KM.4, Terboyo Kulon, Genuk,ISSN 2580-3085 (Online) ISSN 2355-0481 (Print)
Semarang, Central Java, Indonesia, 50112JPH is licensed under a