Email this article Criminal Punishment in The Concept of Non-Conviction based on Asset Forfeiture (Analysis of Islamic Criminal Law)
Abstract
Criminalization within the concept of Non-Conviction Based Asset Forfeiture (NCBAF) plays a crucial role in efforts to combat corruption. This study aims to analyze the implementation of NCBAF in the context of Islamic criminal law, particularly regarding the confiscation of assets obtained from criminal acts without requiring the direct prosecution of perpetrators. This research employs a normative legal method (juridical normative) with a statute approach and a conceptual approach to examine the legal basis, effectiveness, and challenges of NCBAF. The findings reveal that NCBAF offers substantial advantages over conventional criminal justice systems, as it enables the recovery of unlawfully acquired assets without the need for a lengthy trial process. This approach accelerates asset recovery, reduces the risk of legal loopholes exploited by corrupt individuals, and enhances the efficiency of anti-corruption efforts. In Indonesia, the adoption of NCBAF can significantly strengthen corruption eradication policies, provided that sufficient legal and institutional frameworks are in place. From an Islamic legal perspective, NCBAF aligns with fundamental principles of justice, accountability, and property protection. Islamic law upholds the prohibition of illicit wealth and mandates the restitution of unlawfully obtained assets to rightful owners or the public interest. Therefore, the application of NCBAF is not only legally justified but also ethically and religiously endorsed within Islamic jurisprudence. By integrating NCBAF into anti-corruption strategies, Indonesia can reinforce its commitment to justice and economic integrity while ensuring the protection of state assets from illicit enrichment.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Ali, F. (2023). Rekonstruksi Pengaturan Status Hukum Barang Yang Dijaminkan Dengan Fidusia Yang Dirampas Oleh Negara Yang Berbasis Nilai Keadilan. Universitas Islam Sultan Agung.
Alias, M. N. (2021). A Review of Maslahah Mursalah and Maqasid Shariah as Methods of Determining Islamic Legal Ruling. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education (TURCOMAT), 12(3), 2994–3001.
Busyro, M. A. (2019). Maqashid al-syariah: pengetahuan mendasar memahami maslahah. Prenada Media.
FITRI WAHYUNI, F. (2018). Hukum Pidana Islam. PT Nusantara Persada Utama.
Greenberg, T. S. (2009). Stolen asset recovery: a good practices guide for non-conviction based asset forfeiture. World Bank Publications.
Harahap, I. P., & Harahap, A. M. (2024). Tinjauan Yuridis terhadap Pelaku Pidana Pencucian Uang pada Aplikasi Trading Binomo yang Mengakibatkan Kerugian Konsumen (Studi Analisis Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor: 117/PID. SUS/2022/PT. BTN). JIIP-Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pendidikan, 7(2), 2080–2088.
Hiariej, E. O. S. (2013). Teori dan hukum pembuktian.
ICW, M. P. (2023). Laporan Hasil Pemantauan Tren Penindakan Korupsi Tahun 2022.
Kuku, T. P. D. N. (2020). Perampasan Aset Tanpa Menjalani Pemidanaan bagi Pelaku yang Melarikan Diri atau Meninggal Dunia dalam Perkara Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Lex Crimen, 9(4).
Mahmud Marzuki, P. (2005). Penelitian hukum. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media, 55.
Ningtias, D. A. (2024). Pengaturan Risywah Pemilu dan Pilkada Prespektif Hukum Islam. UIN KH Abdurrahman Wahid Pekalongan.
Nugraha, S. P. (2020). Kebijakan Perampasan Aset Hasil Tindak Pidana Korupsi. National Conference on Law Studies (NCOLS), 2(1), 987–1000.
Rivanie, S. S., Muchtar, S., Muin, A. M., Prasetya, A. M. D., & Rizky, A. (2022). Perkembangan Teori-teori Tujuan Pemidanaan. Halu Oleo Law Review, 6(2), 176–188.
Sahetapy, G. V. P., Baadila, E., & Wattimena, J. A. Y. (2022). Pertanggung Jawaban Hukum Pelaku Trafficking In Person Berdasarkan Hukum Internasional Di Indonesia. SANISA: Jurnal Kreativitas Mahasiswa Hukum, 2(1), 32–43.
Santoso, T. (2003). Membumikan hukum pidana islam: penegakan syariat dalam wacana dan agenda. Gema Insani.
Suhariyanto, B. (2016). Restoratif justice dalam pemidanaan korporasi pelaku korupsi demi optimalisasi pengembalian kerugian negara. Jurnal Rechts Vinding: Media Pembinaan Hukum Nasional, 5(3), 421–438.
Sunarto, S. (2020). Konsep Hukum Pidana Islam Dan Sanksinya Dalam Perspektif Al-Qur’an. Kordinat: Jurnal Komunikasi Antar Perguruan Tinggi Agama Islam, 19(1), 97–112.
Sutrisni, N. K., & Sukranata, A. A. K. (2013). Pendekatan Follow the Money dalam Penelusuran Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang serta Tindak Pidana Lain. Dalam Https://Ojs. Unud. Ac. Id/Index. Php/Kerthasemaya/Article/Download/4684/3555#:~: Text= Harta% 20kekayaan% 20lain.-, Pendekatan% 20follow% 20the% 20money% 20mendahulukan% 20mencari% 20uang% 20atau% 20harta% 20kekayaan, Dan% 20tindak% 20pidana% 20yang.
Suyatmiko, W., Nicola, A., & Fajrin, N. (2020). Transparency International Indonesia (TII) merupakan salah satu bagian dari Transparency International, sebuah jaringan global NGO antikorupsi yang mempromosikan transparansi dan akuntabilitas kepada lembaga-lembaga negara, partai politik, bisnis, dan mas.
Syarbaini, A. (2019). Teori ta’zir dalam hukum pidana islam. Ius Civile: Refleksi Penegakan Hukum Dan Keadilan, 2(2).
Syarbaini, A. (2023). Konsep Ta’Zir Menurut Perspektif Hukum Pidana Islam. Jurnal Tahqiqa: Jurnal Ilmiah Pemikiran Hukum Islam, 17(2), 37–48.
Wiarti, J. (2017). Non-Conviction Based Asset Forfeiture Sebagai Langkah Untuk Mengembalikan Kerugian Negara (Perspektif Analisis Ekonomi Terhadap Hukum). UIR Law Review, 1(1), 101–109.
Zaidan, M. A. (2022). Menuju pembaruan hukum pidana. Sinar Grafika.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30659/akta.v12i1.43728
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2025 JURNAL AKTA
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Jurnal Akta has been indexed by:
Editorial Office: Jurnal Akta Room 2nd Floor Imam As Syafei Building Faculty of Law Universitas Islam Sultan Agung. Jln. Kaligawe KM. 4, Semarang City, Central Java, Indonesia. Phone +62 24 6583584 Fax +62 24 6582455
Email: jurnalakta@unissula.ac.id