The Importance Of Oral Health Care Optimization In Bedridden Medicocompromised Patients: A Case Series
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30659/odj.12.3.346-353Keywords:
, 9% NaCl, Bedridden, Oral hygiene, Quality of LifeAbstract
Background: Bedridden patients were highly susceptible to oral complications due to prolonged immobilization, impaired oromotor function, and limited capacity for self-care. The accumulation of debris and reduced salivary flow can become pathological, leading to infection in the oral cavity. This case report aims to describe two cases of medico-compromised bedridden inpatient highlighting the importance of optimizing oral health care. Case Report: Two bedridden inpatients were reffered to Oral Medicine Division, Universitas Indonesia hospital from internist. First case, was a 59-year-old female inpatient with stage IV breast carcinoma and bone metastasis. The second case, was a 68-year-old male inpatient with acute encephalopathy and multiple comorbidities. Both patients shows decreased consciousness, severe oral dryness with high Clinical Oral Dryness Scores (CODS), poor oral hygiene with a abundant plaque and debris, inflamed periodontal tissue and lip lesion. Oral health care maintenance by cleaning and wipping teeth and oral mucosa using sterile gauze moistened in 0.9% NaCl was done and demonstrated to caregiver to be done daily. Petroleum Jelly was perscribe for the lips lesions. Both patients showed improved mucosal hydration, debris reduction, and greater comfort. Discussion: Oral cavity infection is one of the factors that plays an important role in accomplishing the successful overall treatment while bedridden patients had increased risks of oral infection due to limited abilities. Cleaning and wipping with 0,9% NaCl was a safe choice for patient with high risk of aspiration, had a mild antiseptic properties and maintain mucosal hydration. Conclusion: Optimization of oral care in bedridden patients begin with the selection of oral health care maintenance methods by considering the patient's systemic condition.
References
Pattanaporn K, Kaewduangsaeng A, Panich I, Limpaphan N, Lakboon W, Brondani M. Caregivers’ knowledge, attitudes and behaviour towards the daily oral care of bedridden patients in Chiang Rai, Thailand. Gerodontology. 2025;42(1):71–77. doi:10.1111/ger.12772
Di Fede O, Canepa F, Maniscalco L, Tozzo P, Matranga D, Giuliana G. Prevention and treatment of oral mucositis: efficacy of sodium bicarbonate versus other agents: a systematic review. BMC Oral Health. 2023;23(1):1–13. doi:10.1186/s12903-022-02586-4
Verma P, Prasad R, Kumar N, Jaral S. Practicing oral medicine and radiology in private setup: a comprehensive review. J Indian Acad Oral Med Radiol. 2020;32(1):37–40. doi:10.4103/jiaomr.jiaomr_207_19
Asadi N, Jahanimoghadam F. Oral care of intubated patients: challenging task of ICU nurses—a survey of knowledge, attitudes and practices. BMC Oral Health. 2024;24(1):925. doi:10.1186/s12903-024-04652-5
dos Santos AA, Silva LD, Santos CC, Fonseca-Silva T. Oral care practices for patients in intensive care unit: a systematic review. Int J Dent Hyg. 2025;23(1):80–88. doi:10.1111/idh.12822
Kelly N, Blackwood B, Credland N, et al. Oral health care in adult intensive care units: a national point prevalence study. Nurs Crit Care. 2023;28(5):773–780. doi:10.1111/nicc.12919
Kristyaningsih P. Povidone iodine 1% and normal saline as a gargling solution to prevent oral mucositis. Quality Health. Accessed August 14, 2025. Available from: www.qualityhealth.com
Kim DH, Park JS. Effect of saline gargling on dry mouth and sore throat in patients with thyroidectomy. Asian Oncol Nurs. 2020;20(4):160–170. doi:10.5388/aon.2020.20.4.160
Firouzian A, Darvishi Khezri H. Review of common mouthwashes for oral care utilised by nurses in critically intubated patients. Int J Caring Sci. 2014;7:711–720. Available from: www.internationaljournalofcaringsciences.org
Huijghebaert S, Hoste L, Vanham G. Essentials in saline pharmacology for nasal or respiratory hygiene in times of COVID-19. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2021;77(9):1275–1282. doi:10.1007/s00228-021-03102-3
Naibaho EN, Dharmajaya R, Harahap IA. Effectiveness of oral care using normal saline and baking soda towards pain and comfort in mucositis patients undergoing chemotherapy. Indones J Nurs. 2020;11:1–8.
Nokam Kamdem GSJ, Toukam M, Ntep Ntep DB, et al. Comparison of the effect of saline mouthwash versus chlorhexidine on oral flora. Adv Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2022;6:100273. doi:10.1016/j.adoms.2022.100273
Calvo-Guirado JL, Domínguez MF, Aragoneses JM, et al. Evaluation of a seawater-based mouth rinse versus chlorhexidine 0.2% in reducing plaque and gingivitis: a randomized controlled pilot study. Appl Sci (Basel). 2020;10(3):982. doi:10.3390/app10030982
Xia J, Tao X, Hu Q, et al. Expert consensus on the prevention and treatment of radiochemotherapy-induced oral mucositis. Int J Oral Sci. 2025;17(1):1–14. doi:10.1038/s41368-025-00382-8
Zhang Z, Tian L, Liu J, Jiang H, Wang P. Evidence summary on managing radiotherapy-induced oral mucositis in patients with head and neck cancer. Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs. 2024;11(3):100386. doi:10.1016/j.apjon.2024.100386
De Cassai A, Pettenuzzo T, Busetto V, et al. Chlorhexidine is not effective at any concentration in preventing ventilator-associated pneumonia: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. J Anesth Analg Crit Care. 2024;4(1):1–9. doi:10.1186/s44158-024-00166-2
Simmons JSC, Bourgault AM, Sole ML, Peach BC. A review of chlorhexidine oral care in patients receiving mechanical ventilation. Crit Care Nurse. 2024;44(3):45–53. doi:10.4037/ccn2024995
Austin W, Hdeib M, Fraser P, et al. Oral lubrication, xerostomia, and advanced macromolecular lubricants for treatment of dry mouth. Lubricants. 2024;12(4):126. doi:10.3390/lubricants12040126
Ehrenzeller S, Klompas M. Association between daily toothbrushing and hospital-acquired pneumonia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Intern Med. 2023;184(2):131–140. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2023.6638
Kiabi FH, Baradari AG, Kiasari AZ, Shahheidari M. Difference in mouthwash side effects of persica and chlorhexidine for preventing ventilator-associated pneumonia in ICU patients. Open Public Health J. 2023;16(1):e230607. doi:10.2174/18749445-v16-e230607-2022-134
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
