EFEK DENTOSKELETAL PADA MALOKLUSI KELAS II DIVISI 1 DENGAN BIONATOR DAN ALAT ORTODONTI LEPASAN : LAPORAN KASUS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30659/odj.6.1.12-18Keywords:
Class II division 1 malocclusion, Protrusive, Mandibular retrognation, BionatorAbstract
Background: Class II division 1 malocclusion characterized by mandibularretrognation, deep bite and increasement of overjet. Myofunctional appliance could modify the growth and developmental of mandibular at appropriate phase. The purpose of this case report was to present successful management of Class II division 1 by using bionator and removable appliance.
Case Management: A 9 years old girl with upper teeth protrusion, crowding and affected the esthetical perception. The diagnosis was Class II division 1 with mandibular retrognation and upper incisor protrusion, upper and lower anterior crowding and palatal bite. Patient also had lip biting and thumb sucking habit. Bionator leads the mandibular moved forward and arch widening. Treatment planning were to reduce overjet by prognating mandibular and bad habit elimination. Followed by retracting the upper teeth and deep bite correction by using removable appliance.
Conclusion: Patient profile became corrected in 10 weeks. Overjet reduced in by prognating the mandible, decreasing of palatal bite, molar relation become Class I and bad habit elimination. In 10 months, overjet and overbite were corrected.
References
Graber, TM, Swain, BF. Orthodontic Current Principles and Techniques. 5th edition. The C.V. Mosby Company: St.Louis; 2011; 56-64, 169-73.
Pambudi-Rahardjo. Ortodontik Dasar. Airlangga University Press: Surabaya; 2009; 2-6, 60-79.
Profit WR, Fields HW, Sarver DM. Contemporary Orthodontics. 5th ed. Mosby Year Book: St.Louis; 2012; 248-53.
Luthfianty, Afini, dkk. Perawatan Maloklusi Klas II DIvisi 1 Dentoskeletal Disertai Retrusi Mandibula dengan Alat Fungsional Bionator. Maj Ked Gi. Desember 2014; 21(2): 212 - 216.
Almeida MR., Henriques JFC, Almeida RR, Almeida-Pedrin RR, Ursi W. Treatment Effects Produced by The Bionator Appliance. Comparison with An Untreated Class II Sample. Eur J
Orthod. 2004 Feb;26(1):65-72.
Almeida MR, Henriques JFC, Ursi W. Comparative Study of Frankel (FR-2) and Bionator Appliance in The Treatment of Class II Malocclusion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2002
May;121(5):458-66
Bolmgren GA, Moshiri F. Bionator Treatment in Class II Division 1. Angle Orthod. 1986;
Jul;56(3):255-62.
Mamadras AH, Allen LP. Mandibular Response to Orthodontic Treatment with The Bionator Appliance. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1990; 97:
-20.
Illing HM, Morris DO, Lee RT. A Prospective Evaluation of Bass, Bionator, and Twin Block Appliances. Part I - The Hard Tissues. Eur J Orthod, 1998; 20: 501-16.
Daokar S, Agrawal G. Deep Bite Its Etiology, Diagnosis and Management: A Review. J Orthod Endod. 2016, 2:4.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
