Notary's Responsibility for The Occurrence of Identity Forgery in The Making of Authentic Deeds (Demak District Court Decision Study No.143/Pid.B/2023/PN Dmk)
Abstrak
Abstract. Currently the number of Notaries in Indonesia is increasing and making Notaries only focus on the large number of deeds made every day, so this creates a legal loophole, namely that the parties can use fake identities. This study aims to determine the responsibility of Notaries in the event of and legal protection for Notaries if there is falsification of identity carried out by the party in making authentic deeds with a case study on the Decision of the Demak District Court Number Decision 143 / Pid.B / 2023 / PN Dmk. This research method uses a normative legal approach, meaning that the research is conducted using a literature study approach and a statute approach. The type of data uses secondary data obtained from a literature study. The analysis in this study is prescriptive. The results of the study show that a Notary's deed whose face is using a false identity cannot be treated as an authentic deed. Regarding legal protection for Notaries, this can be done by adding a clause at the end of the deed stating that the Notary is not responsible for the false data of the face.
Keywords: Authentic Deed; Criminal Investigation; Right of Refusal; Notary.
Referensi
Aslan Noer. (2005). Pelusuran kedudukan Notaris. Citra Aditya Bakti: Bandung
C.S.T dan Chistine S.T. Kansil. (1996). Pokok-Pokok Etika Profesi Hukum, PT. Pradnya Paramita: Jakarta.
Darmawan, Rina. (2017). Tanggung Jawab Notaris dalam Pembuatan Akta Otentik: Studi Kasus di Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum dan Kebijakan 11, no. 2 hal. 15-220.
Komang Ayuk Septianingsih, et all, (2020). Kekuatan Alat Bukti Akta Otentik Dalam Pembuktian Perkara Perdata. Jurnal Analogi Hukum 2, nomor. 3, https://doi.org/10.22225/ah.2.3.2584.336-340 , Di akses pada tanggal 29 November 2024 pukul 19.45 WIB
Mulyoto. (2016). Tanggung Jawab Notaris dalam Pembuatan Akta Otentik dan Pemalsuan Identitas. Penerbit : Yogyakarta
R. Soegondo Notodisoerjono. (1993). Hukum Notariat di Indonesia Suatu Penjelasan. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada
R. Soesilo. (1993). Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP) serta Komentar-Komentarnya Lengkap Pasal Demi Pasal. Politeia: Bogor.
Siahaan, Marisius. (2015). Hukum Notariat di Indonesia: Teori dan Praktik. Penerbit:Jakarta
Sjaifurrachman dan Habib Adjie. (2011). Aspek Pertanggungjawaban Notaris dalam Pembuatan Akta. Bandung: Mandar Maju.
Theresia Ngutra. (2016). Hukum Dan Sumber-Sumber Hukum. Jurnal Supremasi 11, no. 2, hal. 193–211.
Wawancara dengan Kasat Reskrim AKP. Winardi pada tanggal 20 Januari 2025
Wawancara dengan Kasat Reskrim AKP. Winardi pada tanggal 20 Januari 2025
Wijaya, Irawan. (2020). Pemalsuan Identitas dalam Praktik Notariat. Penerbit: Malang,
Yogi Priyambodo, Gunarto. (2017) Tinjauan Terhadap Pelanggaran Kode Etik Jabatan Notaris di Kabupaten Purbalingga, Jurnal Akta, Volume 4 Nomor 3. hal. 332.
Zaki, Fauzan. (2020). Analisis Hukum tentang Penggunaan Identitas Palsu dalam Pembuatan Akta Notaris. Jurnal Hukum Indonesia 17, no. 2 H.190-205.
Unduhan
Diterbitkan
Terbitan
Bagian
Lisensi
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- The journal holds the copyright for each article published with work licensed simultaneously under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the authorship and early publication of the work in this journal.
- Authors must agree to the copyright transfer agreement by checking the Copyright Notice column at the initial stage when submitting the article.
