Notary's Responsibilities in Providing Social Services in Sragen Regency
Abstract
Abstract. This study examines the responsibility of notaries in providing social services in Sragen Regency. The focus of the study is on why the implementation of notaries' social obligations has not been optimal and what obstacles are faced in practice. This social obligation is regulated in Article 37 of the Notary Law (UUJN), which requires notaries to provide free legal services to the underprivileged. The type of research used is empirical law with a structural approach and economic analysis of law. Primary data were obtained through interviews with notaries in Sragen Regency, while secondary data were sourced from laws and regulations, literature, and legal journals. Data analysis was conducted using descriptive qualitative methods. The results of the study indicate that the implementation of social obligations by notaries is still limited to waiving notary service fees, without covering other costs such as taxes and administration. Furthermore, the lack of clear criteria for the underprivileged community makes its implementation subjective. The main obstacles include a lack of public knowledge, the absence of technical regulations, and high notary operational costs. This study concludes that the implementation of notaries' social responsibilities in Sragen is not optimal. It is recommended that there be legal counseling, regulation of criteria for service recipients, and state support so that notaries can maximize their social obligations. Keywords: Notary; Responsibility; Social Services; Underprivileged Community.References
Books:
G.H.S. Lumban Tobing, (1999), Peraturan Jabatan Notaris, Jakarta: Erlangga
Gustav Radbruch, (1990), Filsafat Hukum, diterjemahkan oleh Satjipto Rahardjo, Jakarta: PT Gramedia
Gustav Radbruch, (1990), Filsafat Hukum, diterjemahkan oleh Satjipto Rahardjo, Jakarta: PT Gramedia; Philipus M. Hadjon, (1987), Perlindungan Hukum bagi Rakyat Indonesia, Surabaya: Bina Ilmu
Habib Adjie, (2011), Hukum Notaris Indonesia: Tafsir Tematik terhadap UU Jabatan Notaris, Bandung: Refika Aditama
Liliana Tedjosaputro, (2012), Etika Profesi Notaris dalam Penegakan Hukum Pidana, Yogyakarta: Bigraf Publishing
Philipus M. Hadjon, (1987), Perlindungan Hukum bagi Rakyat Indonesia, Surabaya: Bina Ilmu
Richard A. Posner, (1973), Economic Analysis of Law, Boston: Little Brown and Company
Satjipto Rahardjo, (2000), Ilmu Hukum, Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti
Soerjono Soekanto, (2006), Pengantar Penelitian Hukum, Jakarta: UI Press
Regulation:
Article 37 of Law Number 2 of 2014 concerning Amendments to Law Number 30 of 2004 concerning the Position of Notary
Law Number 2 of 2014 concerning Amendments to Law Number 30 of 2004 concerning the Position of Notary
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- The journal holds the copyright for each article published with work licensed simultaneously under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the authorship and early publication of the work in this journal.
- Authors must agree to the copyright transfer agreement by checking the Copyright Notice column at the initial stage when submitting the article.