The Responsibilities of Notaries Who Participated in the Crime of Certificate Embezzlement

Authors

Abstract

This study aims to analyze: 1) The responsibility of a notary who participates in the crime of certificate embezzlement. 2) Juridical implications for deeds issued by notaries participating in the crime of certificate embezzlement The approach used in this study is a sociological-juridical approach. The specification of the research used is descriptive analytical research. Types of data using primary data and secondary data obtained through interviews and literature. The data analysis method used in this research is descriptive analysis. The results of the study concluded: 1). Responsibilities of Notaries who participated in committing the crime of certificate embezzlement in Samarinda City were sentenced to 3 months in prison. Notary MS was legally and convincingly proven guilty of committing the crime of participating in embezzlement and fulfilling the elements in Article 372 of the Criminal Code juncto article 55 paragraph 1 of the Criminal Code. This proves that notaries are not above the law, notaries are the same as ordinary people who must comply with laws and regulations. 2) The juridical implication of the deed issued by a notary who participated in the crime of embezzlement of certificates in Samarinda City, namely that the DA as the legal owner can apply for the cancellation of the deed of sale and purchase and certificates to the Court. The filing for annulment aims to maintain legal certainty and certainty of the rights to his land. The imposition of a criminal sentence against Notary MS does not necessarily mean that the deed in question becomes null and void by law. Keywords: Criminal; Embezzlement; Liability.

References

Journals:

Ary Yuniastuti. Jawade Hafidz. Tinjauan Yuridis Kebatalan Akta dan Pertanggungjawaban Notaris. Jurnal Akta. Volume 4 Nomor 2 June 2017.

Dicky Armandau. Pertanggungjawaban Oknum Notaris Dalam Tindak Pidana Turut Serta Melakukan Penggelapan Sertifikat. Jurnal Hukum. Universitas 17 Agustus 1945. Samarinda.

Erina Permatasari. Lathifah Hanim. Peran dan Tanggung Jawab Notaris Terhadap Pelaksanaan Pendaftaran Badan Hukum Perseroan Terbatas Melalui Sistem Online. Jurnal Akta. Volume 4 Nomor 3 September 2017.

Hawariah. Tinjauan Yuridis Terhadap Tindak Pidana Penggelapan Dengan Pemberatan (Studi Kasus Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Makassar No. 1131/Pid.B/2014/PN.Mks). Skripsi. Fakultas Hukum. Universitas Hasanuddin Makassar. 2016.

Nawaaf Abdullah. Munsyarif Abdul Chalim. Kedudukan Dan Kewenangan Notaris Dalam Membuat Akta Otentik. Jurnal Akta. Vol. 4 No. 4 December 2017.

Putri A.R. (2011). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Notaris (Indikator Tugas-Tugas Jabatan Notaris yang berimplikasi Perbuatan Pidana). Medan: Softmedia.

Rifan Agrisal Ruslan. Umar Ma’ruf. Kesadaran Hukum Masyarakat dalam Jual Beli Tanah dengan Akta PPAT di Kecamatan Tinanggea Kabupaten Konawe Selatan Sulawesi Tenggara. Jurnal Akta. Vol. 4 No. 3 September 2017.

Rizki Nurmayanti. Akhmad Khisni. Peran Dan Tanggung Jawab Notaris Dalam Pelaksanaan Pembuatan Akta. Jurnal Akta. Vol. 4 No. 4 December 2017.

Sri Utami. Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Notaris Dalam Proses Peradilan Pidana Menurut Undang-undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2014. tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2004 tentang Jabatan Notaris. Jurnal Repertorium. ISSN:2355-2646. Edistion January 2015.

Books:

Abdul Ghofur Anshori. (2009). Lembaga Kenotariatan Indonesia. Perspektif Hukum dan Etika. Yogyakarta: UII Press.

Agus Rusianto. (2016). Tindak Pidana dan Pertanggungjawaban Pidana (Tinjauan Kritis Melalui Konsistensi antara Asas. Teori dan Penerapannya). Jakarta: Prenamedia Group.

Fahmi Tanjung. (2019). Konstruksi Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Paguyuban (Analisis Melalui Pendekatan Teori-teori Korporasi). Surabaya: Media Sahabat Cendikia.

H.Dwidja Priyanto. (2017). Sistem Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi Dalam Kebijakan Legalitas. Depok: Kencana.

Habib Adjie. (2013). Kebatalan dan Pembatalan Akta Notaris. Bandung: Refika Aditama.

Ismu Gunadi dan Jonaedi Efendi. (2015). Cepat dan Mudah Memahami Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: Kencana Prenadamedia Group.

Shidarta. (2006). Hukum Perlindungan Konsumen Edisi Revisi. Jakarta: Gramedia Widiasarana Indonesia.

Sudikno Mertokusumo. (1984). Bunga Rampai Ilmu Hukum. Yogyakarta: Liberty.

Regulation:

The 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia

Code of Civil law

Criminal Code

Act No. 11 of 2020 concerning Job Creation.

Act No. 2 of 2014 concerning Amendments to the Law concerning the Position of Notary.

Act No. 5 of 1960 concerning Basic Agrarian Regulations

Government Regulation Number 24 of 1997 concerning Land Registration.

Downloads

Published

2023-08-16

Issue

Vol. 1 No. 2 (2023): June 2023

Section

Articles

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. The journal holds the copyright for each article published with work licensed simultaneously under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the authorship and early publication of the work in this journal.
  2. Authors must agree to the copyright transfer agreement by checking the Copyright Notice column at the initial stage when submitting the article.