Notary's Responsibility for Land Sale and Purchase Agreement Deeds (PPJB) that Result in Default

Irawan Satmoko Anggoro, Denny Suwondo

Abstract


This study aims to analyze: 1) The Notary's responsibility for the deed of the Land Sale and Purchase Agreement (PPJB) which resulted in default. 2) Legal protection for parties who are harmed due to default in the implementation of the land PPJB made before a notary. This type of research is analytical descriptive research. The approach method in this research is sociological juridical. The type of data in this research is secondary data. The data collection method uses library techniques (document study). The analysis in this research is prescriptive. The results of the research concluded: 1) The Notary's responsibility for the deed of the Land Sale and Purchase Agreement (PPJB) which resulted in default, namely showing that the notary has legal, administrative, and moral responsibility for the legal consequences of the deed he made. Based on the decision, the notary was deemed negligent because he did not carry out his official obligations to act honestly, carefully, and impartially as regulated in Article 16 paragraph (1) letter a of the Notary Law. Therefore, the notary's responsibility in this case includes a legal obligation to restore the rights of the injured party, administrative responsibility for failing to maintain legal certainty, and moral responsibility for failing to be neutral in protecting parties acting in good faith.
2) Legal protection for parties who are harmed due to default in the implementation of the PPJB for land made before a notary is an effort by the state to guarantee certainty and justice for parties with good intentions. In the Decision of the Boyolali District Court Number 7/Pdt.G/2024/PN Byl, legal protection is provided to sellers who are harmed due to the buyer's default and the negligence of Notary/PPAT Sunarto, SH who continues to withhold the certificate even though the agreement has been null and void. Based on Philipus M. Hadjon's theory, legal protection in this case includes two forms, namely preventive and repressive. Preventive protection should be carried out by notaries through caution and clear legal explanations, while repressive protection is realized through court decisions that restore the rights of sellers. This case emphasizes the responsibility of public officials in maintaining legal certainty and substantive justice for parties with good intentions.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Journals:

Daniar Ramadhan dan Ngadino, 2019, “Kewenangan Notaris Dalam Pembuatan Akta yang Berhubungan dengan Pertanahan”, Jurnal Notarius, Volume 12 Nomor 2.

Dewi Ajeng Wulansari dan Anis Mashdurohatun, 2022, “Peran Notaris Dalam Pembuatan Akta Badan Hukum Perkumpulan Nelayan”, Prosiding Konstelasi Ilmiah Mahasiswa Unissula (KIMU) 7, Universitas Islam Sultan Agung Semarang.

Dewi Kurnia Putri dan Amin Purnawan, 2017, “Perbedaan Perjanjian Pengikatan Jual Beli Lunas dengan Perjanjian Pengikatan Jual Beli Tidak Lunas”, Jurnal Akta, Vol. 4 Nomor 4.

Dewi Rachmayani dan Agus, 2017, “Covernote Notaris Dalam Perjanjian Kredit Dalam Perspektif Hukum Jaminan”, Acta Diurnal: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kenotariatan Fakultas Hukum Unpad, Volume 1 Nomor 1.

Kunni Afifah, 2017, “Tanggung Jawab dan Perlindungan Hukum bagi Notaris secara Perdata Terhadap Akta yang Dibuatnya”, Jurnal Lex Renaissance, Nomor 1 Volume 2.

Kurnia Martini, 2016, “Status Hukum Peralihan Hak Atas Tanah yang Diperoleh dari Lelang Berdasarkan Hak Mendahulu Negara”, Fiat Justisia Journal of Law, Volume 10 Issue 3.

Kusmaryanto dan Gunarto, 2017, “Pendaftaran Akta Jual Beli yang Melebihi Jangka Waktu Pendaftaran Tanah di Kantor Agraria dan Tata Ruang/Badan Pertanahan Nasional Kota Semarang”, Jurnal Akta, Vol. 4 No. 3.

Mochamad Elmo Sidiq, Asep Sunarsa, dan Amin Purnawan, 2018, “Peran Notaris Dalam Transaksi Pengadaan Tanah Untuk Lokasi Pembangunan Komplek Perkantoran Pemerintah Kabupaten Sekadau”, Jurnal Akta, Vol. 5 No. 1.

Putri Lilasari, 2022, “Tanggung Jawab Hukum Atas Kerugian Akibat Wanprestasi Dalam Perjanjian Jual Beli Tanah”, Indonesia Journal of Law and Social-Political Governance, Volume 2 Nomor 2.

Rengganis, 2023, “Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Pembeli Dalam PPJB (Perjanjian Pengikatan Jual Beli) yang Obyeknya Dijaminkan oleh Penjual”, Jurnal Akta Notaris, Vol. 2 No. 1.

Rizki Nurmayanti dan Akhmad Khisni, 2017, “Peran dan Tanggung Jawab Notaris Dalam Pelaksanaan Pembuatan Akta”, Jurnal Akta, Vol. 4 No. 4.

Syarifah Liadan Lathifah Hanim, 2017, “Kepastian Hukum Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Timbulnya Tumpang Tindih Sertifikat Hak Milik (SHM) atas Tanah (Studi Kasus di Kantor Pertanahan Kota Pontianak)”, Jurnal Akta, Volume 4 Nomor 1.

Books:

Abdul Ghofur Anshori, 2009, Lembaga Kenotariatan Indonesia: Perspektif Hukum dan Etika, UII Press, Yogyakarta.

Ahmadi Miru, 2007, Hukum Kontrak dan Perancangan Kontrak, Rajawali Pers, Jakarta.

Andi Hartanto, 2015, Panduan Lengkap Hukum Praktis Kepemilikan Tanah, Laksbang Justitia, Surabaya.

Boedi Harsono, 2008, Hukum Agraria Indonesia: Sejarah Pembentukan Undang-Undang Pokok Agraria, Isi dan Pelaksanaannya, Djambatan, Jakarta.

Effendi Parangin, 1991, Hukum Agraria di Indonesia: Suatu Telaah dari Sudut Pandang Praktisi Hukum, Rajawali Press, Jakarta.

Hans Kelsen, 1945, General Theory of Law and State, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.

Irawan Soerodjo, 2002, Kepastian Hukum Pendaftaran Hak Atas Tanah di Indonesia, Arloka, Surabaya.

Irawan Soerodjo, 2002, Kepastian Hukum Hak Atas Tanah di Indonesia, Arkola, Surabaya.

Maria S.W. Sumardjono, 2001, Kebijakan Pertanahan: Antara Regulasi dan Implementasi, Kompas, Jakarta.

Salim HS, 2008, Pengantar Hukum Perdata Tertulis (BW), Sinar Grafika, Jakarta.

Soedharyo Soimin, 2008, Status Hak dan Pembebasan Tanah, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta.

Subekti, 1998, Hukum Perjanjian, Intermasa, Jakarta.

Tan Thong Kie, 2001, Serba Serbi Praktek Notaris, Ichtiar Baru, Jakarta.

Yahya Harahap, 1986, Segi-Segi Hukum Perjanjian, Alumni, Jakarta.

Regulation:

The 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia.

Civil Code

Law Number 5 of 1960 concerning Basic Agrarian Regulations

Law (UU) Number 2 of 2014 concerning Amendments to Law Number 30 of 2004 concerning the Position of Notary.

Government Regulation Number 24 of 1997 concerning Land Registration.

Regulation of the Head of the National Land Agency of the Republic of Indonesia Number 3 of 2011 concerning Management of Land Case Studies and Handling.

Presidential Regulation of the Republic of Indonesia Number 20 of 2015 concerning the National Land Agency

Government Regulation Number 24 of 2016. Amendment to Government Regulation Number 37 of 1998 concerning the Regulations on the Position of Land Deed Making Officials.

Supreme Court Regulation Number 6 of 2018 concerning Guidelines for Settlement of Governmental Administrative Disputes.

Government Regulation of the Republic of Indonesia Number 18 of 2021 concerning Management Rights, Land Rights, Apartment Units, and Land Registration.

Regulation of the Minister of Agrarian Affairs and Spatial Planning/Head of the National Land Agency (BPN) Number 1 of 2021 concerning Electronic Certificates.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Editorial Office: TABELLIUS: Journal of Law Room 2nd Floor Imam As Syafei Building Faculty of Law Universitas Islam Sultan Agung. Jln. Kaligawe KM. 4, Semarang City, Central Java, Indonesia. Phone +62 24 6583584 Fax +62 24 6582455

Phone: 024-6583584 (574)
Email : tabelius@unissula.ac.id