Actio Pauliana in Bankruptcy Cases Related to The Provision of Credit Facilities with Fiduciary Guarantees (Case Study of Decision Number 17/Pdt.Sus-Actio Pauliana/2023/PN. Niaga.Smg. Jo. No.20/Pdt.Sus.Pailit/2022/PN Niaga Smg.)

Bagus Ariyanto Santa, Nanang Sri Darmadi

Abstract


Abstract. Actio pauliana is a right granted by law to submit a request to the court to cancel all legal actions that are not required to be carried out by the debtor against his assets which the debtor knows that the legal action is detrimental to the creditor, but of course the holder of the liquidus guarantee also has the right to be prioritized when the debtor is declared bankrupt. The type of research in this study is a normative juridical approach method with research data sources using secondary data. The approach method in this study is a statute approach. Data collection techniques use literature studies in journals, books and digital documents. Data analysis techniques used in this study use prescriptive methods. Problems are analyzed using legal protection theory and legal certainty theory. The results of this study indicate that legal protection for fiduciary guarantee holders when a debtor is declared bankrupt is that the guarantee holders of objects have the right to sell the collateral themselves. They seem not to interfere in bankruptcy matters. Take what is their right from the sales income as payment of their receivables, and if there is still a remainder, this remainder is handed over to the inheritance hall. And the judge's consideration in handing down the decision Number 17 / Pdt.Sus-Actio Pauliana / 2023 / PN. Niaga. Smg. Jo. No. 20 / Pdt.Sus.Pailit / 2022 / PN Niaga Smg. which stated that it rejected the Plaintiffs' lawsuit in its entirety because the actions of Defendant I were an exercise of his right to close/pay off his receivables received from the debtor PT Mitra Bersama Realty incasu Abdul Haris (as director), therefore the actions of the debtor PT Mitra Bersama Realty incasu Abdul Haris (as director) and Defendant I were in order to fulfill their respective obligations arising from the agreement, therefore they did not meet the requirements for an actio pauliana lawsuit. Keywords: Actio Pauliana; Bankruptcy; Fiduciary Guarantee. 

Full Text:

PDF

References


Journals:

Heru Sugiyono & Rosalia Dika Agustanti, “Legal Certainty In Arbitration Awaards That Are Final And Binding”, Jurnal Indonesia Law Review, Vol.10 No.3 Article 6, (2020)

Heru Sugiyono, “Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Pihak Ketiga Sebagai Pemilik Jaminan Ketika Tidak Dilaksanakannya Prinsip Kehati-Hatian Oleh Bank Dalam Perjanjian Kredit Dengan Memakai Jaminan”, Jurnal Yuridis Vol. 4 No. 1, (2017)

Books:

Abdul R. Saliman, (2012), Hukum Bisnis Untuk Perusahaan Teori dan Contoh Kasus, Jakarta : Kencana

Andika Wijaya & Wida Peace Ananta, (2018), Hukum Acara Pengadilan Niaga, Jakarta : Sinar Grafika

Andreas Albertus Andi Prajitno, (2010), Hukum Fidusia, Malang : Selaras Malang

H Tan Kamello, (2014), Hukum Jaminan Fidusia Suatu Kebutuhan Yang Didambakan, Bandung : Alumni

Hajar M, (2015), Model-Model Pendekatan Dalam Penelitian Hukum dan Fiqh, Pekanbaru : UIN Suska Riau

Ivida Dewi Amrih & Herowati Poesoko, (2011), Hak Kreditor Separatis dalam Mengeksekusi Benda Jaminan Debitor Pailit, Yogyakarta : LaksBang PRESSindo

John Salindeho, (1994), Sistem Jaminan Kredit Dalam Era Pembangunan Hukum, Jakarta : Sinar Grafika

Kartini Muljadi dan Gunawan Widjaja, (2003), “Perikatan Pada Umumnya”, Jakarta : PT. Raja Grafindo Persada

Munir Fuady, (2005), Pengantar Hukum Bisnis Menata Bisnis Modern Era Global, Bandung : Citra Aditya Bakti

Oey Hoey Tiong, (1984), Fiducia sebagai Jaminan Unsur-Unsur Perikatan, Jakarta Timur : Ghalia Indonesia

Subekti, (2002). Pokok-Pokok Hukum Perdata, Jakarta

Yan Apul, Permasalahan Terhadap Kendala Efektivitas Undang-undang Kepailitan dan Solusinya dari Sudut Pandang Kurator, Disajikan dalam Seminar Nasional hukum Kepailitan Indonesia, Jakarta, 29 October 2008

Zainal Asikin, (2003), “Hukum Kepailitan dan Penundaan Pembayaran di Indonesia”, Jakarta : PT. Raja Grafindo

Internet:

Hukumonline, “Perbedaan Actio Pauliana di Pengadilan Niaga dengan di Pengadilan Negeri”. (online), https://www.hukumonline.com/klinik/a/perbedaan-iactio-pauliana-i-di-pengadilan-niaga-dengan-di-pengadilan-negeri-lt4fb481b5dff91.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Editorial Office: TABELLIUS: Journal of Law Room 2nd Floor Imam As Syafei Building Faculty of Law Universitas Islam Sultan Agung. Jln. Kaligawe KM. 4, Semarang City, Central Java, Indonesia. Phone +62 24 6583584 Fax +62 24 6582455

Phone: 024-6583584 (574)
Email : tabelius@unissula.ac.id