Legal Effects of a Notary Deed Read by Notary Staff without Attendance by Notary and Witnesses

Actika Actika, Sri Endah Wahyuningsih

Abstract


Abstract. Notaries have an important role in Indonesia, especially in the making of Authentic Deeds, in making Authentic deeds are required to be in accordance with the procedures as regulated in the Notary Law. In the Notary Law, the making of Authentic deeds must be attended or read directly by the Notary concerned and attended by witnesses, but in practice in Indonesia, especially in Batam City, deviations often occur, where in the making of Authentic deeds, for example, in the making of Credit Agreement Deeds at Banks, the reading of credit agreements in the case of credit agreement deeds is only carried out by Notary staff without being attended by Notaries and witnesses. The approach used in this research is a sociological juridical approach. The analysis in this study is prescriptive in nature. The research results concluded: 1) The validity of an Authentic Deed read by a notary staff can be considered legally flawed, and may even not have the power of an Authentic Deed as explained in Article 1869 of the Civil Code and this is also a violation of the law, as a result the deed can be considered formally invalid. 2)The instrumental witness who is not present to witness the process of reading the Authentic deed, in accordance with Article 41 of the UUJN, results in the Authentic deed only having evidentiary power as a private deed, meaning it does not meet the requirements of an Authentic deed. As explained in Article 1868 of the Civil Code, if the formal requirements such as reading in front of witnesses and signing by witnesses are not met, the deed loses its evidentiary power as an authentic deed and the deed only has evidentiary power as a private deed, the value of which is much weaker in legal proceedings and in court.3)Notaries who request to be represented by staff in the reading of authentic deeds may receive administrative sanctions in the form of reprimands, warnings, schorsing (temporary dismissal) from association members, Onzetting (dismissal) from association members, dishonorable dismissal from association membership.

Keywords: Instrumental Witness; Notarial Deed; Validity.



Full Text:

PDF

References


Journals:

Abdul Jalal, Suwitno, & Sri Endah Wahyuningsih, (2018), “Keterlibatan Pejabat Notaris Tehadap Perbuatan Melawan Hukum dan Turut Serta Melakukan Tindak Kejahatan Dalam Pemalsuan Dokumen”, Sultan Agung Notary Law Review (SANLaR), Vol. 5 No. 1, https://jurnal.unissula.ac.id/index.php/akta/article/view/2551/1912 .

Abdul Jalal, Suwitno, & Sri Endah Wahyuningsih, (2018), Keterlibatan Pejabat Notaris Tehadap Perbuatan Melawan Hukum dan Turut Serta Melakukan Tindak Kejahatan Dalam Pemalsuan Dokumen”, Sultan Agung Notary Law Review (SANLaR), Vol. 5 No. 1, https://jurnal.unissula.ac.id/index.php/akta/article/view/2551/1912, accessed on august 1, 2025 at 15.34 WIB

Felisa Haryati, (2018), Pelanggaran Kode Etik Notaris terkait Persaingan tidak sehat Sesama Rekan Notaris Ditinjau dari Peraturan Kode Etik Ikatan Notaris Indonesia (I.N.I), Jurnal Hukum Volkgeist, Volume 3 Nomor 1, Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Airlangga

Mardiyah, I Ketut Rai Setiabudhi, & Gede Made Swardhana, (2017), Sanksi Hukum Terhadap Notaris yang Melanggar Kewajiban dan Larangan Undang-undang Jabatan Notaris, Acta Comitas : Jurnal Ilmiah Prodi Kenotariatan, Volume 1 Nomor 2, Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Udayana

Merlyani, D., Yahanan, A., & Trisaka, A. (2020). Kewajiban Pembacaan Akta Otentik Oleh Notaris Di Hadapan Penghadap Dengan Konsep Nanda, Liza Dwi, 2016, Perliundungan Hukum Terhadap Saksi Instrumenter Dalam Akta notariil yang Aktanya Menjadi Objek Perkara Pidana di Pengadilan, Premise Law Journal. doi : http//dx.doi.org/10.28946/rpt.v9i1.358.

Nawaaf Abdullah, (2017), kedudukan dan Kewenangan Notaris dalam membuat Akta Otentik. Jurnal Akta 4 No. 4 : 655664.

Nur Cahyanti, Budi Raharjo, & Sri Endah Wahyuningsih, (2018), “Sanksi Terhadap Notaris yang Melakukan Tindak Pidana Menurut Peraturan Perundang-Undangan di Indonesia”. Sultan Agung Notary Law Review (SANLaR), Vol. 5 No. 1, https://jurnal.unissula.ac.id/index.php/akta/article/view/2617/1969.

Oktavianti, P. C. (2021). Kedudukan Saksi Instrumenter Dalam Merahasiakan Akta Otentik Dan Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Saksi Instrumenter. Syntax Literate; Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia, 6(5), 2408–2417. https://doi.org/10.36418/syntax-literate.v6i5.2720.

Sufi, Fayakundia Putra, & Rusdianto Sesung, (2017), Pemisahan Jabatan Pejabat Umum di Indonesia. Perspekti 22 No. 3 : 202212.

Yogi Hanapiah, Sigit Prihanto, & Sri Endah Wahyuningsih, (2018), “P-P yang perlu diperhatikan Oleh Notaris Dalam Membuat Akta Perjanjian Notariil” Sultan Agung Notary Law Review (SANLaR), Vol. 5 No. 1, https://jurnal.unissula.ac.id/index.php/akta/article/view/2538/1899 , accessed August 1, 2025 at 16.00 WIB.

Books:

Mukti Fajar & Yulianto Achmad, (2015), Dualisme Penelitian Hukum Normatif dan Empiris, Cetakan ke3, Yogyakarta : Pustaka Pelajar

Rosa Agustina, (2003), Perbuatan Melawan Hukum, Penerbit Pasca Sarjana, Depok : FH Universitas Indonesia

Sudikno Mertokusumo, (2006), Penemuan Hukum Sebuah Pengantar, Yogyakarta : Liberty

Tan Thong Kie, (2000), Studi Notariat & Serba-Serbi Praktek Notaris, Jakarta : Ichtiar Baru Van Hoeve.

Tan Thong Kie, (2013), Studi Notariat dan Serba-Serbi Praktek Notaris, Cetakan ke-III, Jakarta : Ichtiar Baru Van Hoeve

Regulation:

Civil Code

Law Number 2 of 2014 concerning Amendments to Law Number 30 of 2004 concerning the Position of Notary


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Editorial Office: TABELLIUS: Journal of Law Room 2nd Floor Imam As Syafei Building Faculty of Law Universitas Islam Sultan Agung. Jln. Kaligawe KM. 4, Semarang City, Central Java, Indonesia. Phone +62 24 6583584 Fax +62 24 6582455

Phone: 024-6583584 (574)
Email : tabelius@unissula.ac.id