Legal Implications of Notarial Deed Signing Reading Not Carried Out Simultaneously by the Parties Before a Notary Public PPAT

Erico Setyawan Kusuma Putra, Shallman Shallman

Abstract


Abstract. The form and procedures stipulated by Law No. 2 of 2014 concerning the Position of Notary and Regulation Order 24 of 2016 concerning the Land Deed Making Official are clear, however, there is a Reading and Signing of Notarial Deeds that are not carried out simultaneously by the Parties in the presence of the Notary and the Land Deed Making Official, so the author would like to describe the Legal Implications in the Reading and Signing of Notarial Deeds that are not carried out simultaneously by the Parties in the presence of the Notary and the Land Deed Making Official and their Responsibilities. The writing method uses a normative legal approach in order to obtain the conclusion that the Notary Position Law, Government Regulation concerning the Land Deed Making Official and other regulations have regulated it well, both implicitly and explicitly. Thus, the results of the discussion obtained are as follows: (1) Authentic Deeds are closely related to the obligations and sanctions given to Notaries. Notaries are authorized to make authentic deeds as regulated in Article 15 of Law No. 2 of 2014 concerning the Position of Notaries. Notaries in carrying out their authority have obligations that must be carried out as regulated in Article 16 paragraph (1) letter I and paragraph (8). Where if it is not fulfilled, its authenticity will be lost unless there is an obstacle in accordance with Article 44 paragraph (1) while in the Regulation of Order 24 of 2016 concerning Land Deed Making Officials, the authority is contained in Article 2 which has obligations that must be carried out in accordance with Article 22. The legal implication is that it can be canceled or null and void by law because it does not meet the subjective requirements in the form of an agreement between the parties and the objective requirements in the form of a lawful cause. In addition, the making of a deed which contains a procedure that is not in accordance with the making of the deed results in the deed being formally defective (2)if provencan be dismissed dishonorably for not carrying out his duties and position properly.and civil and criminal sanctions may be imposed depending on how much the negligence causes losses to the parties.

Keywords: Land Titles Registrar; Notary Public; Reading and Signing.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Journals:

Boedi Harsono, “Tugas Dan Kedudukan Pejabat Pembuat Akta Tanah,” Jurnal Hukum Dan Pembangunan 25, no. 6 (1995).

H S Salim, “Teknik Pembuatan Akta Pejabat Pembuat AKta Tanah (PPAT)/Salim HS,” 2016. Tercantum dalam Pasal 19 angka 1 Undang-Undang Jabatan Notaris

Kerina Maulidya Putri, Ichsan Anwary, and Diana Haiti. “Kewajiban Notaris Melakukan Pembacaan Dan Penandatanganan Akta Di Depan Semua Pihak Secara Bersama-Sama.” Notary Law Journal 1, no. 2 (2022): 157–75.

Krisdianto R Maradesa, “Kewenangan Serta Tanggung Jawab Hukum Atas Pembuatan Akta Otentik Oleh Notaris Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Tentang Jabatan Notaris,” Lex Privatum 2, no. 3 (2014).

Mia Elvina, “Implikasi Hukum Terhadap Akta Yang Dibuat Oleh Notaris Yang Tidak Dibacakan Dan Ditandatangani Secara Bersama-Sama,” Lex Renaissance 5, no. 2 (2020): 438–57.

Philippe Nonet, Philip Selznick, and Robert A Kagan, Law and Society in Transition: Toward Responsive Law (Routledge, 2017).

Putra, Haldin Perdana, Dyah Ochtorina Susanti, and Rahmadi Indra Tektona. “Keabsahan Akta Hibah Yang Dibuat Oleh Ppat Bagi Anak Angkat Tanpa Persetujuan Salah Satu Ahli Waris.” Jurnal Rechtens 11, no. 1 (2022): 35–52.

S H Moeljatno, KUHP (Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana) (Bumi Aksara, 2021).

Septianingsih, Komang Ayuk., et al. “Kekuatan Alat Bukti Akta Otentik Dalam Pembuktian Perkara Perdata.” Jurnal Analogi Hukum 2, no. 3 (2020): 336–40.

Siti Muflichah, Trusto Subekti, and Haedah Faradz. “EKSEPSI PLURIUM LITIS CONSORTIUM (Studi Terhadap Putusan Pengadilan Tinggi Semarang No. 401/Pdt/2002/PT. Smg Jo. Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Purwokerto No. 41/Pdt. G/2000/PN. Pwt).” Jurnal Dinamika Hukum 8, no. 2 (2008): 121–30.

William J Chambliss, Crime and Criminal Behavior, vol. 1 (Sage, 2011).

Books:

Andi Hamzah, KUHP Dan KUHAP (Jakarta: Rhineka Cipta, 2007).

Fuady Munir, “Perbuatan Melawan Hukum,” Jakarta: Citra Aditya Bakti, 2002.

Kelsen, “Teori Umum Hukum Dan Negara.”

Moeljatno, KUHP (Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana).

Umbara, “Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2014 Tentang Jabatan Notaris.”


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Editorial Office: TABELLIUS: Journal of Law Room 2nd Floor Imam As Syafei Building Faculty of Law Universitas Islam Sultan Agung. Jln. Kaligawe KM. 4, Semarang City, Central Java, Indonesia. Phone +62 24 6583584 Fax +62 24 6582455

Phone: 024-6583584 (574)
Email : tabelius@unissula.ac.id