Execution of Debt Guarantee in Subsidized Housing Credit Agreements Not Based on Deed of Grant of Mortgage Rights (APHT)

Shaiful Kostiawan, Achmad Arifulloh

Abstract


Abstract. This study aims to analyze: 1) The legal position of debt collateral in subsidized housing credit agreements that are not based on the Deed of Granting Mortgage Rights (APHT). 2) The procedure for executing debt collateral in subsidized housing credit agreements without APHT according to applicable laws and regulations. This type of research is included in the scope of normative legal research. The approach method in this study is the statute approach. The type of data in this study is secondary data, consisting of primary, secondary and tertiary legal materials. The data collection method was obtained through literature study. The analysis in this study is prescriptive. The results of the study concluded: 1) The legal position of debt collateral in subsidized Home Ownership Credit (KPR) agreements that are not based on the Deed of Granting Mortgage Rights (APHT) is very weak in terms of juridical. Although the Regulation of the Minister of ATR/BPN Number 22 of 2017 provides leniency by allowing the use of a Power of Attorney to Charge Mortgage Rights (SKMHT) until the end of the credit agreement period, this does not change the fact that mortgage rights can only be legally recognized if they are made through an APHT and registered at the Land Office in accordance with the provisions of Law Number 4 of 1996 concerning Mortgage Rights. Without an APHT, the collateral provided by the debtor does not have legal execution power and does not provide perfect property rights for the creditor. 2) The procedure for executing debt collateral in a subsidized mortgage agreement that is not based on a Deed of Granting Mortgage Rights (APHT) cannot be carried out through a direct parate execution mechanism, as regulated in Law Number 4 of 1996 concerning Mortgage Rights. Without an APHT and registration of mortgage rights, the collateral does not have legal standing, so that the creditor does not have preferential rights or execution power over the collateral object. In this condition, the only legal route available to creditors is to seek settlement through a civil lawsuit on the basis of default, which tends to be longer, more complex and riskier.

Keywords: Debt Guarantee Execution; Subsidized Housing Credit; KPR.

 


Full Text:

PDF

References


Journals:

Agustina, 2023, Perlindungan Konsumen Kpr Bank Syariah Atas Rumah Yang Tidak Sesuai Spesifikasi Dan Gagal Bangun, Proceeding International Seminar on Islamic Studies Medan, Volume 4 Nomor 1.

Andi Tenriawaru, 2020, Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Kreditur dalam Perjanjian Kredit dengan Jaminan SKMHT, Jurnal Hukum Ekonomi, Vol. 5 No. 2.

Dessy Andiyaningsih, Umar Ma’ruf, Pengalihan Hak Tanggungan Pada Perbankan di Kabupaten Banjarnegara, Jurnal Akta, Vol 5 No 1 Maret 2018.

Devi Setiawan, 2021, Analisa Hukum Perjanjian Kredit Pemilikan Rumah (Bersubsidi Di PT. Bank Tabungan Negara (Persero), TBK.,Notary Law Research, Volume 03 Nomor 01.

Lathifah Hanim, MS.Noorman, 2016, Penyelesaian Perjanjian Kredit Bank Sebagai Akibatforce Majeure Karena Gempa di Yogyakarta, Jurnal Pembaharuan Hukum, Faculty of Law, Unissula,Volume III Nomor 2.

Rifki Yusuf dan Maryanto, 2018, Peran Notaris Dalam Penggunaan Akta SKMHT Yang Tidak Diikuti APHT Terhadap Debitor Wanprestasi, Jurnal Akta, Volume 5 Nomor 1.

Books:

Kasmir, 2010, Manajemen Perbankan, RajaGrafindo Persada, Jakarta.

Maria SW Sumardjono, 2021, Kebijakan Pertanahan: Antara Regulasi dan Implementasi, Kompas.

Mariam Darus Badrulzaman, 1998, Kerangka Hukum Jaminan Indonesia Dalam Hukum Jaminan Indonesia Seri Dasar Hukum Ekonomi , Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung.

Munir Fuady, 2002, Hukum Perkreditan Kontemporer, Bandung, Citra Aditya Bakti.

Munir Fuady, 2003, Hukum Jaminan Utang, Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung.

Purwadi Patrik dan Kashadi, 2001, Hukum Jaminan, Fakultas Hukum Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang.

Rachmadi Usman, 2009, Hukum Jaminan Kebendaan, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta.

Ridwan Khairandy, 2022, Hukum Jaminan dan Eksekusi dalam Perbankan Indonesia, Rajawali Pers.

Salim HS, 2016, Perkembangan Hukum Jaminan di Indonesia, Rajawali Pers, Jakarta.

Sudikno Mertokusumo, 2019, Hukum Acara Perdata Indonesia, Kencana, Jakarta.

Sutan Remy Sjahdeini, 2012, Hak Tanggungan, Asas-Asas, Ketentuan-ketentuan Pokok dan MAsalah-Masalah yang dihadapi Oleh Perbandingan, Airlangga University Press.

Sutarno, 2005, Aspek-aspek Hukum Perkreditan Pada Bank, Alfabetal, Jakarta.

Regulation:

The 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia

Civil Code

Law Number 5 of 1960 concerning Basic Agrarian Principles.

Law No. 4 of 1996 concerning Mortgage Rights on Land and Objects Related to Land.

Law Number 10 of 1998 concerning Banking

Law Number 6 of 2023 concerning the Stipulation of Government Regulation in Lieu of Law Number 2 of 2022 concerning Job Creation into Law.

Law Number 1 of 2011 concerning Housing and Residential Areas

Law Number 2 of 2014 concerning Amendments to Law Number 30 of 2004 concerning the Position of Notary.

Presidential Regulation Number 10 of 2006 concerning the National Land Agency.

Regulation of the Minister of Agrarian Affairs and Spatial Planning/Head of the National Land Agency of the Republic of Indonesia Number 22 of 2017 concerning the Determination of the Time Limit for the Use of a Power of Attorney to Encumber Mortgage Rights to Guarantee the Repayment of Certain Credits

Regulation of the Minister of Public Works and Public Housing Number 35 of 2021 concerning Ease and Assistance in Housing Financing for Low-Income Communities.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Editorial Office: TABELLIUS: Journal of Law Room 2nd Floor Imam As Syafei Building Faculty of Law Universitas Islam Sultan Agung. Jln. Kaligawe KM. 4, Semarang City, Central Java, Indonesia. Phone +62 24 6583584 Fax +62 24 6582455

Phone: 024-6583584 (574)
Email : tabelius@unissula.ac.id